Science, Research, Knowledge and Capacity Building
Tóm tắt
A small part of the scientific community is seeking hard to enhance the contribution of science, knowledge and capacity building to environmentally sustainable and socially fair human development around the world. Many researchers over the globe share the same commitment – anchored in concerns for the human condition. They believe that science and research can and have influenced sustainability. Therefore their main goals are to seek and build up knowledge, know-how and capacity that might help to feed, nurture, house, educate and employ the world's growing human population while conserving its basic life support systems and biodiversity. They undertake projects, that are essentially integrative, and they try to connect the natural, social and engineering sciences, environment and development of communities, multiple stakeholders, geographic and temporal scales. More generally, scientists engaged in sustainable development are bridging the worlds of knowledge and action. This pro-active, heavily ethics- and wisdom-based "science for sustainability" can be seen as the conclusion of all dialogues and discussions amongst scientists at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) 2002 in Johannesburg. The "Plan of Implementation" after WSSD will be based on political will, practical steps and partnerships with time-bound actions. Several "means of implementation" are going to be proofed and initiated: finance, trade, transfer of environmentally sound technology, and, last but not least, science and capacity building. Some characteristics of working scientific sustainability initiatives are that they are regional, place-based and solution-oriented. They are focusing at intermediate scales where multiple stresses intersect, where complexity is manageable, where integration is possible, where innovation happens, and where significant transitions toward sustainability can start bottom-up. And they have a fundamental character, addressing the unity of the nature – society system, asking how that interactive system is evolving and how it can be consciously, if imperfectly, steered through the reflective mobilization and application of appropriate knowledge and know-how. The aims of such sustainability-building initiatives conducted by researchers are: first to make significant progress toward expanding and deepening the research agenda of science and knowledge-building for sustainability; secondly to strengthen the infrastructure and capacity for conducting and applying science, research and technology for sustainability – everywhere in the world where it is needed; and thirdly, to connect science, policy and decision-making more effectively in pursuit of a faster transition towards real sustainable development. The overall characteristic is, that sustainability initiatives are mainly open-ended networks and dialogues for the better future. A world society that tries to turn towards sustainable development has to work hard to refine their clumsy technologies, in "earthing" their responsibility to all creatures and resources, in establishing democratic systems in peace and by heeding human rights, in building up global solidarity through all mankind and in commit themselves to a better life for the next generations.
Tài liệu tham khảo
African Academy of Sciences: 1999, Tunis Declaration: Millennial Perspective on Science, Technology and Development in Africa and its Possible Directions for the Twenty-first Century, Fifth General Conference of the African Academy of Sciences, Hammamet, Tunisia, 23-27 April 1999.
Annan, K.: 2000, We, the Peoples: The Role of the United Nations in the 21st Century, New York, United Nations (http://www.un.org/millennium/sg/report/full.htm.).
Binder, C.: 2002, ‘Research in partnership with developing countries: application of the method of material flux analysis in Tunja/Colombia’, in F. Moavenzadeh, K. Hanaki and P. Baccini (eds.), Future Cities: Dynamics and Sustainability, Dordrecht, Kluwer Publishers.
Bronscomb, L., Holton, G. and Sonnert, G.: 2001, Science for Society: Cutting-edge Basic Re-search in the Service of Public Objectives (http://www.cspo.org/products/reports/scienceforsociety.pdf).
Clark, W.C.: 1986, ‘Sustainable Development of the Biosphere: Themes for a Research Program’, in W.C. Clark and R.E. Munn (eds.), Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 5–48.
European Commission: 1998, ‘Fifth framework programme: putting research at the service of the citizen’, in S. Funtowicz, and M. O'Connor, (eds.), 1999, Science for Sustainable Development, Special Issue of Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2(3) (http://www.cordis.lu/fp5/src/over.htm).
Funtowicz, S., O'Connor, M., Ravetz, J.: 1999, ‘Scientific Communication, International Cooperation and Capacity building for Sustainable Development’, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2(3), 363–367.
WGBU-German Advisory Council on Global Change: 1997, World in Transition: The Research Challenge, Annual Report 1996, Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
Gupta, A.: 1999, ‘Science, sustainability and social purpose: barriers to effective articulation, dialogue and utilization of formal and informal science in public policy’, Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2(3), 368–371.
International Council of Science (ICSU): 2001, Global Change and the Earth system: A Planet Under Pressure, Paris, IGBP Science Series No. 4.
IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 2001, Special Report on Climate Change and Sustainable Development, Plenary Seventeenth Session, Nairobi, April 2001. (http://www.ipcc.ch/meet/p17.pdf).
Kates, R., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Gruebleer, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, H.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, III B., O'Riordan, T. and Svedin U.: 2000, Sustainability Science. Research and Assessment Systems for Sustainability, Program Discussion Paper 2000-33, Cambridge, MA: Environment and Natural Resources Program, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. (also published in Science, 292, 641-642 (http://sustainabilityscience.org).
Lubchenco, J.: 1998, ‘Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science’, Science 279, 491–497.
National Research Council, Committee on Global Change: 2002, The Science of Regional and Global change: Putting Knowledge to Work, Washington, National Academy Press.
Rocha-Miranda, C.E. (ed.): 2000, Transition to Global Sustainability: The Contributions of Brazilian Science, Rio de Janeiro, Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias.
Sachs, J.D.: 2000, ‘A new map of the world’, The Economist 355, 81–83.
Schellnhuber, H.J. and Wenzel, V. (eds.): 1998, Earth System Analysis: Integrating Science for Sustainability, Berlin, Springer Verlag.
Scholz, R.W. and Tietje, O.: 2001, Embedded Case Study Methods, Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge, Thousand Oaks, Sage.
SCRES-The Standing Committee for Responsibility and Ethics in Science: 2002, Standards for Ethics and Responsibility in Science-an Empirical Study (http://www.icsu.org/Library/Reviews/SCRES/SCRESStandards% 20report.pdf).
Strigl, A.W.: 2001, ‘Limits and options for sustaining technological development through systems renewal’, In Proceedings of the Environment Informatics Conference 2001: Sustainability in the Information Society, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries: 2001, Enhancing Research Capacity in Developing and Transition Countries, Experiences, Discussions, Strategies and Tools for Building Research Capacity and Strengthening Institutions in View of Promoting Research for Sustainable Development, Bern.
United Nations: 1992, Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Final Text of Agreements negotiated by Governments at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), 3-14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
UNDP-United Nations Development Program: 2001, Making New Technologies Work for Human Development: The Human Development Report 2001, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
UNEP-United Nations Environmental Program: 2002, GEO: Global Environment Outlook, London, Earthscan Publisher.
UN-FPA-United Nations Populations Fund: 2001, The State of World Population 2001: Footprints and Milestones: Population and Environmental Change, Denmark, Phoenix-Trykkeriet AS.
United States National Research Council: 1999, Our Common Journey: A Transition Toward Sustainability, Washington, DC, Board on Sustainable Development, National Academy Press.
Watson, R., Dixon, J.A., Hamburg, S.P., Janetos, A.C. and Moss, R.H.: 1998, Protecting Our Planet, Securing Our Future, UN Environment Programme, Nairobi (http://www-esd.worldbank.org/planet).
WB-World Bank (1998) Knowledge for development: The World Development Report for 1998/9, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
WCED-World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
World's Scientific Academies: 2000, Transition to Sustainability in the 21st Century, Tokyo Summit, May 2000 (http://interacademies.net/intracad/tokyo2000.nsf).