More Evidence on the Use of Constructed-Response Questions in Principles of Economics Classes
Tài liệu tham khảo
Becker, 1999, The Relationship between Multiple Choice and Essay Response Questions in Assessing Economics Understanding, Economic Record, 75, 348, 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1999.tb02571.x
Bennett, 1991, Equivalence of Free-Response and Multiple-Choice Items, Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 77, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00345.x
Bloom, 1956
Buckles, 2006, Using Multiple-Choice Questions to Evaluate In-Depth Learning of Economics, Journal of Economic Education, 37, 48, 10.3200/JECE.37.1.48-57
Iz, 2007, Use of Bloom′s Taxonomic Complexity in Online Multiple Choice Tests in Geomatics Education, Survey Review, 39, 226, 10.1179/003962607X165195
Johnston, 1997
Kennedy, 1997, Combining Multiple-Choice and Constructed Response Test Scores: An Economists View, Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 359, 10.1207/s15324818ame1004_4
Krieg, 2001, Student Performance in Business and Economic Statistics: Does Exam Structure Matter?, Journal of Economics and Finance, 25, 229, 10.1007/BF02744525
Lumsden, 1987, The Economics Student Reexamined: Male–female Differences in Comprehension, Journal of Economic Education, 18, 365, 10.1080/00220485.1987.10845228
Nunnally, 1978
Thissen, 1994, Are Tests Comprising Both Multiple-Choice and Free-Response Items Necessarily Less Unidimensional Than Multiple-Choice Tests? An Analysis of Two Tests, Journal of Educational Measurement, 31, 113, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1994.tb00437.x
Wainer, 1993, Combining multiple-choice and constructed response test scores: Towards a Marxist theory of test construction, Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 103, 10.1207/s15324818ame0602_1
Walstad, 2006, Testing for Depth of Understanding in Economics Using Essay Questions, Journal of Economic Education, 37, 38, 10.3200/JECE.37.1.38-47
Walstad, 1994, Achievement Differences on Multiple-Choice and Essay Tests in Economics, American Economic Review, 84, 193
Zheng, 2008, Application of Bloom′s Taxonomy Debunks the “MCAT Myth”, Science, 319, 414, 10.1126/science.1147852
