Montesquieu for the twenty‐first century: factoring civil society and business into global governance

AtleMidttun1
1Professor based at the Norwegian School of Management, Oslo, Norway

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper sets out to argue for rethinking governance through the prism of Montesquieu's model of checks and balances within state powers. It aims to explore the parallel between the eighteenth century concept of division of power and the current need to engage and balance the powers of the state, industry/markets and civil society in governance for global sustainability. It also takes Montesquieu's doctrine of balance of powers beyond static checks and balances into more dynamic innovation.Design/methodology/approachThis is a conceptual paper that translates seventeenth and eighteenth century state theory into twenty‐first century governance. It also explores how models from innovation may be applied to discuss dynamic aspects of governance.FindingsDrawing on the product‐cycle model, the paper shows how governance entrepreneurship may be explored and understood in innovation terms. The paper explores extractive industries' transparency initiative (EITI) as an illustration of governance innovation to address a gross governance and market failure in the extractive industries – the “resource curse”, particularly in developing countries. It shows how much of EITI's remarkable success in building institutional support is due to actors expanding from their traditional domains into new complementary roles. Each of the three powers – civil society, business, and politics – has exploited their comparative advantages in bringing the governance project forward.Originality/valueGiven the limitation of conventional governance models, the originality/value of the paper lie in its launch of new supplementary governance approaches and their application to the EITI case.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bauchowitz, S. (2009), Measuring EITI's Success, available at: www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/3088 (accessed September 2009).

Brown Weiss, E. (1999), “The emerging structure of international environmental law”, in Vig, N. and Axelrod, R. (Eds), The Global Environment, CQ Press, Washington, DC.

Commission on Global Governance (1995), Our Global Neighbourhood, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

EITI (2006), Report of the International Advisory Group, available at: http://eiti.org/files/document/eiti_iag_report_english.pdf (accessed 1 September 2009).

Elkington, J. (2001), The Chrysalis Economy: How Citizen CEOs and Corporations Can Fuse Values and Value Creation, Capstone, Oxford.

Global Witness (1999), A Crude Awakening, available at: www.globalwitness.org/media_library_detail.php/93/en/a_crude_awakening (accessed 16 June 2009).

Global Witness (2003), Interview with Global Witness, Joe Schumacher, available at: www.monitor.upeace.org/archive.cfm?id_paper=58 (accessed 28 July 2003).

Held, D. (2002), “Law of estates, law of peoples. Three models of sovereignty”, Legal Theory, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1‐44.

Henderson, B. (1984), “The application and misapplication of the experience curve”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 3‐7.

Ikenberry, G.J. (2001), After Victory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Kotler, P. (1991a), “Marketing management”, in Kotler, P. (Ed.), Managing Products Through Their Product Life Cycle, Chapter 13, pp. 347‐72.

Kotler, P. (1991b), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 7th ed., Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Locke, J. (2004), Chapter XII; The Legislative, Executive and Federative Power of the Commonwealth; Second Treatise of Government, Barnes and Noble Books, Totowa, NJ, p. 86 (originally published in 1690).

Midttun, A. (2008), “Partnered governance: aligning corporate responsibility and public policy in the global economy”, Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 406‐18.

Midttun, A. and Ørjasæter, N.O. (2009), “The firm as a Nexus of product cycles: organising intrapreneurship in the innovative firm”, in Arentsen, M. and van Rossum, W. (Eds), Governance of Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (also previously published in Norwegian: Selskapet som et knippe produktsykluser: organisering av intraprenørskap i det innovative foretak; I Tor Hernes og Anne Louise Koefoed (red): Innovasjoners odyssé: Innovasjonsledelse fra idé til marked. Fagbokforlaget 2007).

Montesquieu, C.L. de Secondat, baron de (1989), The Spirit of the Laws, in Cohler, A.M., Miller, B.C. and Stone, H.S. (Eds), Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (French: L'esprit des lois) (first published anonymously by Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu in 1748 with the help of Claudine Guérin de Tencin).

Ölcer, D. (2009), “Extracting the maximum from EITI”, Working Paper No. 276, OECD Development Centre, Paris, February.

Publishwhatyoupay (2009), Publishwhatyoupay, available at: www.publishwhatyoupay.org/en/resources/energy‐security‐through‐transparency‐act‐2009 (accessed September 2009).

Rosenau, J. (1997), Along the Domestic‐Foreign Frontier, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Spindler, G. (2000), “Separation of powers: doctrine and practice”, paper, suitable for Year 11‐12 Legal Studies, originally appeared in Legal Date, March 2000) available at: www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/publications.nsf/0/E88B2C638DC23E51CA256EDE00795896 (accessed 10 October 2009).

Stratfor Global Intelligence (2004), Human Rights: A New Lever for Angolan Oil Transparency?, available at: www.stratfor.com/memberships/84157/human_rights_new_lever_angolan_oil_transparency (accessed 15 september 2009).

Utterback, J.M. and Abernathy, W.J. (1975/2000), A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation; The Political Economy of Science, Technology and Innovation, 2000, Vol. 116, International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, Cheltenham, and Northampton, MA, pp. 386‐403 (Elgar Reference Collection).

Vernon, R. (1966), “International investment and international trade in the product cycle”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 80 No. 2.

Zadek, S. (2004), “The path to corporate responsibility”, Harvard Business Review, December, Vol. 82 No. 12, pp. 125‐32.

MacAlister, T. (2002), The Guardian, 27 February.