Mobility and Energy Impacts of Shared Automated Vehicles: a Review of Recent Literature

Broggi A, Bertozzi M, Fascioli A, Conte G. Automatic vehicle guidance: the experience of the ARGO autonomous vehicle. World Sci. 1999. Available at: http://millemiglia.ce.unipr.it/ARGO/flyer.pdf1999. Accessed 2019 Apr 9]. Dickmanns ED. Dynamic vision for perception and control of motion: Springer; 2007. Forrest A, Konca M. Autonomous cars and society. 2007. Available at: https://web.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-043007-205701/unrestricted/IQPOVP06B1.pdf2007. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. EUREKA. Programme for a european traffic system with highest efficiency and unprecedented safety | EUREKA. Available at: http://www.eurekanetwork.org/project/id/45. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision For Safety. 2017. Available at: https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/13069a-ads2.0_090617_v9a_tag.pdf2017. Accessed 2019 Apr 17. Greenblatt JB, Shaheen S. Automated vehicles, on-demand mobility, and environmental impacts. Curr Sustain Energy Reports. Springer International Publishing. 2015;2:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-015-0038-5. Business Insider. Companies making driverless cars by 2020. Available at: https://www.businessinsider.com/google-apple-tesla-race-to-develop-self-driving-cars-by-2020-2016-42016. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. Engadget. Waymo launches its first commercial self-driving car service. Available at: https://www.engadget.com/2018/12/05/waymo-one-launches/2018. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. Wired. Elon Musk promises a really truly self-driving Tesla in 2020 | WIRED. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-tesla-full-self-driving-2019-2020-promise/2019. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. Nordhoff S, van Arem B, Happee R. Conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless podlike vehicles. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2016;2602:60–7. https://doi.org/10.3141/2602-08. Kyriakidis M, Happee R, de Winter JCF. Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. Pergamon. 2015;32:127–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2015.04.014. Schoettle B, Sivak M. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute; 2014. Available at: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/1083842014. Accessed 2019 Mar 15. •• Krueger R, Rashidi TH, Rose JM. Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. Pergamon. 2016;69:343–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRC.2016.06.015This article provides important insight on service characteristics that could affect the acceptability of SAVs. Haboucha CJ, Ishaq R, Shiftan Y. User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. Pergamon. 2017;78:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRC.2017.01.010. Bansal P, Kockelman KM. Are we ready to embrace connected and self-driving vehicles? A case study of Texans. Transportation (Amst). Springer US. 2018;45:641–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9745-z. Bansal P, Kockelman KM, Singh A. Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. Elsevier Ltd. 2016;67:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019. Nazari F, Noruzoliaee M, Mohammadian A(K). Shared versus private mobility: Modeling public interest in autonomous vehicles accounting for latent attitudes. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2018;97:456–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.005. Lustgarten P, Le Vine S. Public priorities and consumer preferences for selected attributes of automated vehicles. J Mod Transp. Springer. Berlin Heidelberg. 2018;26:72–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-017-0147-5. Liu J, Kockelman KM, Boesch PM, Ciari F. Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation. Transportation (Amst). Springer US. 2017;44:1261–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9811-1. Gurumurthy KM, Kockelman KM. Analyzing the dynamic ride-sharing potential for shared autonomous vehicle fleets using cellphone data from Orlando. Florida. Comput Environ Urban Syst. Pergamon. 2018;71:177–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPENVURBSYS.2018.05.008. • Chen TD, Kockelman KM, Hanna JP. Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. Elsevier Ltd. 2016;94:243–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.020This article explores different operational scenarios and presents hurdles to effective SAEV operations. Bauer GS, Greenblatt JB, Gerke BF. Cost, energy, and environmental impact of automated electric taxi fleets in Manhattan. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:4920–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04732. Chen TD, Kockelman KM. Management of a shared autonomous electric vehicle fleet: implications of pricing schemes. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2016;2572:37–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/2572-05. Pakusch C, Stevens G, Bossauer P. Shared autonomous vehicles: potentials for a sustainable mobility and risks of unintended effects. ICT4S Epic Ser Comput. 2018:258–45. Shen Y, Zhang H, Zhao J. Integrating shared autonomous vehicle in public transportation system: A supply-side simulation of the first-mile service in Singapore. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. Pergamon. 2018;113:125–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRA.2018.04.004. Harper CD, Hendrickson CT, Mangones S, Samaras C. Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. Pergamon. 2016;72:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRC.2016.09.003. Harb M, Xiao Y, Circella G, Mokhtarian PL, Walker JL. Projecting travelers into a world of self-driving vehicles: estimating travel behavior implications via a naturalistic experiment. Transportation (Amst). Springer US. 2018;45:1671–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9937-9. Singleton PA. Discussing the “positive utilities” of autonomous vehicles: will travellers really use their time productively? Transp Rev. 2019;39:50–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1470584. Chase R. Shared Mobility Principles for Livable Cities. Available at: https://www.sharedmobilityprinciples.org/2017. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. Martin EW, Shaheen SA. Greenhouse gas emission impacts of carsharing in North America. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2011;12:1074–86. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2011.2158539. Menon N, Barbour N, Zhang Y, Pinjari AR, Mannering F. Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: An exploratory empirical assessment. Int J Sustain Transp. Taylor & Francis. 2018:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1443178. Stocker A, Shaheen S. Shared automated vehicles: Review of Business Models. 2017. Available at: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/shared-automated-vehicles-business-models.pdf2017. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. Stocker A, Shaheen S. Shared automated mobility: early exploration and potential impacts. In: Meyer G, Beiker S, editors. Road Veh Autom 4. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 125–39. Baum-Snow N. Did Highways Cause Suburbanization? Q J Econ. Narnia. 2007;122:775–805. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.2.775. Gelauff G, Ossokina I, Teulings C. Spatial and welfare effects of automated driving: Will cities grow, decline or both? Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2019;121:277–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.013. Ma Q, Kockelman K, Segal M. Making the most of curb spaces in a world of shared autonomous vehicles: a case study of Austin, Texas. Transp Res Board 97th Annu Meet. Available at: http://amonline.trb.org/2017trb-1.3983622/t027-1.3994219/709-1.3994795/18-01266-1.3994820/18-01266-1.3994821?qr=12018. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. Zhang W, Guhathakurta S, Fang J, Zhang G. Exploring the impact of shared autonomous vehicles on urban parking demand: An agent-based simulation approach. Sustain Cities Soc. Elsevier B.V. 2015;19:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2015.07.006. Stocker A, Shaheen S. Shared automated vehicle (SAV) pilots and automated vehicle policy in the U.S.: current and future developments. Cham: Springer. p. 131–47. Available at:. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94896-6_122019. Shaheen S. Shared mobility and automation: empirical evidence and policy implications. Available at: https://3rev.ucdavis.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Susan.Shaheen_3RPolicy-Conference_March2019.pdf2019. •• Shaheen S, Cohen A. Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transp Rev. Taylor & Francis. 2018:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728This article highlights the impacts and current understanding of shared-ride services and provides recommendations to governmental agencies for managing the future convergence of shared mobility services and automated vehicles. Shaheen S. Shared mobility: the potential of ridehailing and pooling. In: Sperling D, editor. Three Revolutions Steer Autom Shared, Electr Veh to a Better Futur. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics; 2018. p. 55–76. Forscher T, Bayen A, Shaheen S. Road usage charging (RUC). ITS Berkeley Policy Briefs. 2018. https://doi.org/10.7922/G2KD1W2R. Simoni MD, Kockelman KM, Gurumurthy KM, Bischoff J. Congestion pricing in a world of self-driving vehicles: An analysis of different strategies in alternative future scenarios. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. Elsevier. 2019;98:167–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.002. Roe M, Toochek C. Curbside management strategies for improving transit reliability crub appeal. 2017. Available at: https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/NACTO-Curb-Appeal-Curbside-Management.pdf2017. Accessed 2019 Apr 9. International Transportation Forum. The share-use city: managing the curb. 2018. Available at: https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/shared-use-city-managing-curb_3.pdf2018 Accessed 2019 Apr 9. National Academies of Sciences Medicine and Engineering. Socioeconomic impacts of automated and connected vehicles. Socioecon. Impacts Autom. Connect. Veh. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2019. p. 2019. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Monthly energy review–April 2019. 2019. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/mer.pdf2019. . U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2017. 1990. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/inventory-us-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-sinks1990. Accessed 2019 Apr 25. Fagnant DJ, Kockelman KM. The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. Elsevier Ltd. 2014;40:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001. Alonso-Mora J, Samaranayake S, Wallar A, Frazzoli E, Rus D. On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114:462–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611675114. Lokhandwala M, Cai H. Dynamic ride sharing using traditional taxis and shared autonomous taxis: A case study of NYC. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. Elsevier. 2018;97:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.007. Zhang W, Guhathakurta S, Fang J, Zhang G. The performance and benefits of a shared autonomous vehicles based 2 dynamic ridesharing system: an agent-based simulation approach. Transp Res Board. 2015;15. Martinez LM, Viegas JM. Assessing the impacts of deploying a shared self-driving urban mobility system: An agent-based model applied to the city of Lisbon. Portugal. Int J Transp Sci Technol. 2017;6:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.05.005. Greenblatt JB, Saxena S. Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nat Clim Chang. 2015;5:860–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2685. • Wadud Z. Help or hindrance? Travel and energy implications of highly automated vehicles. Transp Res Part A. 2016;86:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.12.001This article presents estimates of changes in energy consumption due to different mechanisms related to vehicle automation and provides estimates of changes in energy consumption under multiple aumation scenarios. Lu M, Taiebat M, Xu M, Hsu S-C. Multiagent spatial simulation of autonomous taxis for urban commute: travel economics and environmental impacts. J Urban Plan Dev. 2018;144:04018033. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000469.