Mapping a country's competitive position: a real exchange rate approach

Emerald - Tập 28 Số 3 - Trang 233-244 - 2011
J.Zambujal‐Oliveira1, MiguelFaria e Castro2
1Department of Engineering and Management (DEG), Centre for Management Studies (CEG‐IST), Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Technical University of Lisbon (UTL), Lisbon, Portugal
2Faculty of Economics, New University of Lisbon (UNL), Lisbon, Portugal

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe observed real exchange rate, measured as an effective index of real labour costs, may serve as a base for the evaluation of the Portuguese economy's competitiveness. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the positioning of the real exchange rate, throughout time, against a benchmark that guarantees external macroeconomic equilibrium (balanced fundamental account).Design/methodology/approachThis paper uses the effective real exchange rate as an indicator of Portugal's competitive position in relation to its major trading partners (fundamental equilibrium exchange rate approach using the unit labour costs).FindingsThe authors found evidence that the real exchange rate has been persistently overvalued since the early 1990s. The evolution of this situation, which is harmful for the national economy, does not evidence the return to a path that may ensure external equilibrium for Portugal. The results show evidence of significant overvaluation of the Portuguese real exchange rate when compared to its estimated equilibrium level. In order to achieve a balanced fundamental account and considering a margin of error of 5 per cent, the real exchange rate needs to depreciate between 27.69 and 30.61 per cent.Originality/valueThe relevance of the real effective exchange rate as a macroeconomic indicator arises from its role as a measure of national competitiveness. Computed as a measure of the difference of international prices, adjusted to the same unit of measurement, it represents the relative price of goods between countries, determining where this same price may be higher or lower. According to Krugman and Obstfeld, the manipulation of the real effective exchange rate allows one country to adjust its level of competitiveness against its trading partners.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

BdP (1999), Boletim Estatístico, Banco de Portugal, Lisbon.

Burda, M. and Wyplosz, C. (2001), Macroeconomics: A European Text, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Costa, S. (1998), “Determinação da Taxa de Câmbio Real de Equilíbrio para a Economia Portuguesa com base na FEER”, Boletim Económico, Banco de Portugal, Lisbon.

Costa, S. (2005), “Um Resumo da Literatura de Determinação da Taxa de Câmbio Real de Equilíbrio: Aplicações ao caso da Taxa de Câmbio do Euro”, Boletim Económico, Banco de Portugal, Lisbon, Winter.

Dolado, J. and Viñals, J. (1991), “Macroeconomic policy, external targets and constraints: the case of Spain”, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 505, January.

Elliot, G., Rothenberg, T. and Stock, J. (1996), “Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root”, Econometrica, Vol. 64 No. 4, pp. 813‐36.

Enders, W. (2003), Applied Econometric Time Series, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, New York, NY.

Freitas, M. (1992), “Sobre a Futura Paridade do Escudo: Há lugar para uma apreciação real”, Working Paper No. 183, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, April.

Jarque, C. and Bera, A. (1980), “Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of the regression residuals”, Economic Letters, Vol. 6 No. 3.

Joseph, J. (2004), “Non‐stationary effects in causal sales forecasting models”, working paper, SSRN, July.

Krugman, P. and Obstfeld, M. (2009), International Economics: Theory and Policy, Person Education, Boston, MA.

Macedo, J. (1990), “External liberalization with ambiguous public response: the experience of Portugal”, in Bliss, C. and Macedo, J. (Eds), Unity with Diversity in the European Economy: The Community's Southern Countries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Manteu, C. and Mello, A. (1992), “Taxa de Câmbio de equilíbrio fundamental”, Boletim Trimestral, Bank of Portugal, Lisbon, December.

Sachs, J. and Larrain, F. (1993), Macroeconomics in the Global Economy, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Savin, N. and White, K. (1977), “The Durbin‐Watson test for serial correlation with extreme sample sizes or many regressors”, Econometrica, Vol. 45 No. 8, pp. 1989‐96.

Wald, A. (1943), “Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large”, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 54, pp. 426‐82.

White, H. (1980), “A heteroskedasticity‐consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity”, Econometrica, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 817‐38.

Williamson, J. (1983), The Exchange Rate System, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.

Williamson, J. (2009), “2009 estimates of fundamental equilibrium exchange rates”, Policy Brief, No. PB09‐10, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.

Catão, L. (2007), “Why real exchange rates?”, IMF Finance & Development, IMF article series, September.

Williamson, J. (1994), Estimating Equilibrium Exchange Rates, Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.