Management of patients with T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study on patient management and risk of metastatic disease

Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques - Tập 30 - Trang 4102-4113 - 2016
Dirk Schölvinck1,2, Hannah Künzli1,2, Sybren Meijer3, Kees Seldenrijk4, Mark van Berge Henegouwen5, Jacques Bergman2, Bas Weusten1,2
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
3Department of Pathology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
4Department of Pathology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
5Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Esophagectomy for submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is performed in order to optimize patient outcomes given the risk of concurrent lymph node metastases (LNM). However, not seldom, comorbidity precludes these patients from surgery. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the course of follow-up after treatment in submucosal EAC patients undergoing surgery versus conservative therapy and to evaluate the incidence of metastatic disease. Between 2001 and 2012, all patients undergoing diagnostic endoscopic resection for EAC in two centers were reviewed. Only patients with histopathologically proven submucosal tumor invasion were included. Submucosal EACs were divided into tumors that were removed radically (R0) and irradically (R1). Subsequently, in the R0 group, EACs were classified as either low risk (LR; submucosal invasion <500 nm, G1–G2, no LVI) or high risk (HR; deep submucosal invasion >500 nm, G3–G4 and/or LVI). Metastatic disease was defined as LNM in surgical resection specimen and/or evidence of malignant disease during follow-up (FU). Sixty-nine patients with a submucosal EAC were included [23 R1-resections and 46 R0-resection (14 R0-LR and 32 R0-HR)]. Twenty-six patients underwent surgical treatment (1 R0-LR, 12 R0-HR and 13 R1). None of the 14 R0-LR patients developed metastatic disease after a median FU of 60 months. In the R0-HR group and R1 group, metastatic disease was diagnosed in 16 and 30 % of patients, respectively. Surgical patients tended to have a better overall survival than non-surgical patients (p = 0.09). Tumor-related deaths, however, were 12 % in both groups. In LR submucosal EAC, the risk of metastatic disease appears to be very low. In deep submucosal EAC (either R0- or R1-resection), the rate of metastatic disease is lower than reported in earlier surgical series. Given the reasonable disease-free survival and high background mortality, conservative management of these patients seems to be a valid alternative for surgery in selected cases.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Hur C, Miller M, Kong CY, Dowling EC, Nattinger KJ, Dunn M et al (2013) Trends in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality. Cancer 119:1149–1158

Leers JM, DeMeester SR, Oezcelik A, Klipfel N, Ayazi S, Abate E et al (2011) The prevalence of lymph node metastases in patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma a retrospective review of esophagectomy specimens. Ann Surg 253:271–278

Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C et al (2011) Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg 11:2

van Sandick JW, van Lanschot JJ, ten Kate FJ, Offerhaus GJ, Fockens P, Tytgat GN et al (2000) Pathology of early invasive adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction: implications for therapeutic decision making. Cancer 88:2429–2437