La santé périnatale en France métropolitaine de 1995 à 2003

Blondel, 1997, La situation périnatale en France. Évolution entre1981 et1995, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 26, 770

Blondel, 2001, Évolution des principaux indicateurs de santé périnatale en France métropolitaine entre1995 et1998, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 30, 552

Bréart, 1991, Mortalité et morbidité périnatales en France, p.175

Rumeau-Rouquette, 1984, Naître en France

Blondel B, Supernant K, Du Mazaubrun C, Bréart G. Enquête nationale périnatale 2003. Situation en 2003 et évolution depuis 1998. Paris, INSERM, 2005. http://www.sante.gouv.fr

Vilain, 2005

Theulière, 2004, Les étudiants dans l’ensemble du supérieur. Note d’information, Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, 28, 1

Mercier, 1999, Hausse de l’emploi sur dix mois. Enquête sur l’emploi de janvier1999, INSEE Première, 658, 1

Hill, 2005, Évolution de la consommation de cigarettes en France par sexe, 1900-2003, BEH, 21-22, 94

Bréart, 1997, Delayed childbearing, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 75, 71, 10.1016/S0301-2115(97)00190-5

Cazein, 2004, La notification obligatoire du VIH, une priorité de santé publique, un engagement de tous, BEH, 24

Le Chenadec J. Évolution des inclusions et des recrutements dans l’Enquête Périnatale française en 2003. In: http://u569.kb.inserm.fr/epfbiblio; 2005.

Khoshnood, 2004, Socioeconomic barriers to informed decisionmaking regarding maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: results of the French National Perinatal Survey of 1998, Am J Publ Health, 94, 484, 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.484

Khoshnood, 2003, Effects of maternal age and education on the pattern of prenatal testing: implications for the use of antenatal screening as a solution to the growing number of amniocenteses, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189, 1336, 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00643-4

Hannah, 2000, Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial, Lancet, 356, 1375, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3

Whyte, 2004, Outcomes of children at 2years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 191, 872, 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.056

Goffinet, 2006, Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, 1002, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.817

Saurel-Cubizolles, 1998, Emploi des femmes, conditions de travail et retard de croissance intra-utérin

Guendelman, 1999, Birth outcomes of immigrant women in the United States, France and Belgium, Matern Child Health, 3, 177, 10.1023/A:1022328020935

Foix-L’Hélias, 2000, Facteurs de risque de prématurité en France et comparaisons entre prématurité spontanée et prématurité induite. Résultats de l’enquête nationale périnatale 1995, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 29, 55

Foix-L’Hélias, 2000, Changes in risk factors of preterm delivery in France between 1981 and 1995, Paediatr Perinat Epidem, 14, 314, 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00300.x

Henriet, 2001, Impact of induced abortions on subsequent pregnancy outcome: the 1995 French national perinatal survey, Br J Obstet Gynecol, 108, 1036, 10.1016/S0306-5456(01)00243-1

Blondel, 2002, The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: an international study, Am J Public Health, 92, 1323, 10.2105/AJPH.92.8.1323

Blondel, 2002, L’augmentation des naissances multiples et ses conséquences en santé périnatale, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 31, 725

Zeitlin, 2002, Fetal sex and preterm birth: are males at greater risk?, Hum Reprod, 17, 2762, 10.1093/humrep/17.10.2762

Nabet, 2005, Smoking during pregnancy and preterm birth according to the obstetric history: the French National Perinatal Survey, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 19, 88, 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00639.x

Vayssière, 1999, Human immunodeficiency virus screening among pregnant women in France: results from the 1995 national perinatal survey, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 180, 564, 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70255-3

Khoshnood, 2003, Effects of maternal age and education on the pattern of prenatal testing: implications for the use of antenatal screening as a solution to the growing number of amniocenteses, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189, 1336, 10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00643-4

Khoshnood, 2004, Socio-economic barriers to making informed decisions about maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: results of the National Perinatal Survey of 1998 in France, Am J Public Health, 94, 484, 10.2105/AJPH.94.3.484

Khoshnood, 2005, Comparison of the use of amniocentesis in two countries with different policies for prenatal testing: the case of France and the United States, Prenat Diagn, 25, 14, 10.1002/pd.1075

Crost, 1998, L’allaitement maternel à la maternité en France en 1995. Enquête nationale périnatale, Arch Pediatr, 5, 1316, 10.1016/S0929-693X(99)80049-9

Delvaux, 1999, Disparity in prenatal care in Europe, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 83, 185, 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00237-1

Guihard, 2001, Trends in risk factors for caesarean sections in France between 1981 and 1995: lessons for reducing the rates in the future, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 108, 48, 10.1016/S0306-5456(00)00009-7

Guihard, 2001, Les facteurs associés à la pratique d’une césarienne en France. Résultats de l’Enquête Nationale Périnatale de 1995, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod, 30, 444

Wildman, 2003, European indicators of health care during pregnancy, delivery and the post-partum period, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 111, S53, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.006

Bréart, 2003, Characteristics of the childbearing population in Europe, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 111, S45, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.005

Buitendijk, 2003, Indicators of fetal and infant health outcomes in Europe, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 111, S66, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.007

Bouyer, 2004