Knee donor-site morbidity after mosaicplasty – a systematic review

Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics - Tập 3 - Trang 1-17 - 2016
Renato Andrade1,2,3, Sebastiano Vasta4, Rogério Pereira1,2,3,5, Hélder Pereira6,7,8,9, Rocco Papalia4, Mustafa Karahan10, J. Miguel Oliveira2,7,11, Rui L. Reis7,11, João Espregueira-Mendes2,3,7,11,12
1Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
2Clínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Porto, Portugal
3Dom Henrique Research Centre, Porto, Portugal
4Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Campus Biomedico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal
6Orthopaedic Department, Centro Hospitalar Póvoa de Varzim, Vila do Conde, Portugal
73B’s Research Group–Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Guimarães, Portugal
8ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
9Ripoll y De Prado Sports Clinic FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Murcia-Madrid, Spain
10Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
11ICVS/3B’s – PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
12Orthopaedics Department of Minho University, Minho, Portugal

Tóm tắt

Mosaicplasty has been associated with good short- to long-term results. Nevertheless, the osteochondral harvesting is restricted to the donor-site area available and it may lead to significant donor-site morbidity. Provide an overview of donor-site morbidity associated with harvesting of osteochondral plugs from the knee joint in mosaicplasty procedure. Comprehensive search using Pubmed, Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and CINAHL databases was carried out through 10th October of 2016. As inclusion criteria, all English-language studies that assessed the knee donor-site morbidity after mosaicplasty were accepted. The outcomes were the description and rate of knee donor-site morbidity, sample’s and cartilage defect’s characterization and mosaicplasty-related features. Correlation between mosaicplasty features and rate of morbidity was performed. The methodological and reporting quality were assessed according to Coleman’s methodology score. Twenty-one studies were included, comprising a total of 1726 patients, with 1473 and 268 knee and ankle cartilage defects were included. The defect size ranged from 0.85 cm2 to 4.9 cm2 and most commonly 3 or less plugs (averaging 2.9 to 9.4 mm) were used. Donor-site for osteochondral harvesting included margins of the femoral trochlea (condyles), intercondylar notch, patellofemoral joint and upper tibio-fibular joint. Mean donor-site morbidity was 5.9 % and 19.6 % for knee and ankle mosaicplasty procedures, respectively. Concerning knee-to-knee mosaicplasty procedures, the most common donor-site morbidity complaints were patellofemoral disturbances (22 %) and crepitation (31 %), and in knee-to-ankle procedures there was a clear tendency for pain or instability during daily living or sports activities (44 %), followed by patellofemoral disturbances, knee stiffness and persistent pain (13 % each). There was no significant correlation between rate of donor-site morbidity and size of the defect, number and size of the plugs (p > 0.05). Osteochondral harvesting in mosaicplasty often results in considerable donor-site morbidity. The donor-site morbidity for knee-to-ankle (16.9 %) was greater than knee-to-knee (5.9 %) mosaicplasty procedures, without any significant correlation between rate of donor-site morbidity and size of the defect, number and size of the plugs. Lack or imcomplete of donor-site morbidity reporting within the mosaicplasty studies is a concern that should be addressed in future studies. Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Braun BJ, Brandenburg LO, Braun C (2012) Treatment of a partial avascular necrosis of a metacarpal head (Morbus Mauclaire Dieterich’s Disease) utilizing the ostechondral autograft transfer system (OATS) technique. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 44(1):35–39

Hangody L, Füles P (2003) Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of full-thickness defects of weight-bearing joints. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85(suppl 2):25–32

Hangody L, Dobos J, Balo E, Panics G, Hangody LR, Berkes I (2010) Clinical experiences with autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty in an athletic population: a 17-year prospective multicenter study. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1125–1133

Kock NB, van Tankeren E, Oyen WJ, Wymenga AB, van Susante JL (2010) Bone scintigraphy after osteochondral autograft transplantation in the knee: 13 patients followed for 4 years. Acta Orthop 81(2):206–210

Mundi R, Bedi A, Chow L, Crouch S, Simunovic N, Enselman ES, Ayeni OR (2015) Cartilage Restoration of the knee a systematic review and meta-analysis of level 1 studies. Am J Sports Med:0363546515589167