Indications for and benefits of lumbar facet joint block: analysis of 230 consecutive patients

Neurosurgical Focus - Tập 13 Số 2 - Trang 1-5 - 2002
Alan Bani1, Uwe Spetzger, Joachim M. Gilsbach
1Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Duisburg-Wedau, Duisburg, Germany. [email protected]

Tóm tắt

Object The authors evaluated the effectiveness of using a facet joint block with local anesthetic agents and or steroid medication for the treatment of low-back pain in a medium-sized series of patients. Methods Over a period of 4 years, the authors performed 715 facet joint injections in 230 patients with variable-length histories of low-back pain. The main parameter for the success or failure of this treatment was the relief of the pain. For the first injection—mainly a diagnostic procedure—the authors used a local anesthetic (1 ml bupivacaine 1%). In cases of good response, betamethasone was injected in a second session to achieve a longer-lasting effect. Long-lasting relief of the low-back pain and/or leg pain was reported by 43 patients (18.7%) during a mean follow-up period of 10 months. Thirty-five patients (15.2%) noticed a general improvement in their pain. Twenty-seven patients (11.7%) reported relief of low-back pain but not leg pain. Nine patients (3.9%) suffered no back pain but still leg pain. One hundred sixteen patients (50.4%), however, experienced no improvement of pain at all. In two cases the procedure had to be interrupted because of severe pain. There were no cases of infection or hematoma. Conclusions Lumbar facet joint block is a minimally invasive procedure to differentiate between facet joint pain and other causes of lower-back pain. The procedure seems to be useful for distinguishing between facet joint pain from postoperative pain due to inappropriate neural decompression after lumbar surgery. It can be also recommended as a possible midterm intervention for chronic low-back pain.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1097/00007632-198311000-00011

10.1016/0021-9290(96)00023-1

Cavanaugh JM, 1997, Clin Orthop, 335, 166, 10.1097/00003086-199702000-00016

10.1097/00007632-199503010-00016

10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80025-X

10.1093/rheumatology/35.12.1269

Eisenstein SM, 1987, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 69, 3, 10.1302/0301-620X.69B1.2950102

Khoury GY, 1991, AJR, 157, 685, 10.2214/ajr.157.4.1832511

Gangi A, 1998, Radiographics, 18, 621, 10.1148/radiographics.18.3.9599387

10.1097/00007632-199503150-00002

10.1097/00007632-198801000-00015

10.1097/00007632-198906000-00002

10.1097/00007632-199805150-00021

Jackson RP, 1992, Clin Orthop, 279, 110, 10.1097/00003086-199206000-00013

Jerosch J, 1996, Neurosurg Clin N Am, 7, 119, 10.1016/S1042-3680(18)30411-X

10.1097/00007632-199411001-00017

Lilius G, 1989, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 71, 681, 10.1302/0301-620X.71B4.2527856

10.1097/00007632-198410000-00016

10.1016/S0140-6736(76)90893-X

Lynch MC, 1986, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 68, 138, 10.1302/0301-620X.68B1.2934398

10.1097/00007632-198701000-00012

10.1016/0304-3959(92)90239-8

10.1097/00007632-199509150-00001

10.1097/00007632-199604010-00001

Mooney V, 1976, Clin Orthop, 115, 149

10.3109/17453676908989482

10.1016/0304-3959(95)00170-0

10.1007/BF01410967

10.1097/00007632-197903000-00009

10.1213/00000539-198901000-00008

10.1097/00007632-198712000-00012

10.1097/00007632-199809150-00011

Revel ME, 1992, Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73, 824

10.1016/S0304-3940(96)13282-1

10.1097/00007632-199703010-00003

Vallfors B, 1985, Scand J Rehabil Med, 11, 1

10.1097/00007632-199709150-00012