Increasing the capacity of an isolated merge by metering its on-ramp

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological - Tập 39 Số 10 - Trang 896-913 - 2005
Michael J. Cassidy1, Jittichai Rudjanakanoknad2
1University of California, Berkeley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, 416C McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
2University of California, Berkeley Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, 416F McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Cassidy, M.J., 2003. Freeway on-ramp metering, delay savings, and diverge Bottleneck, In: Transportation Research Record 1856, TRB, Washington, DC, pp. 1–5.

Cassidy, 1999, Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks, Transportation Research Part B, 33, 25, 10.1016/S0191-2615(98)00023-X

Cassidy, M.J., Windover, J.R., 1995. Methodology for assessing dynamics of freeway traffic flow. In: Transportation Research Record 1484, TRB, Washington, DC, pp. 73–79.

Cassidy, 2002, Study of freeway traffic near an off-ramp, Transportation Research Part B, 36, 563

Daganzo, 1995, The cell transmission model, Part II: network traffic, Transportation Research Part B, 29, 79, 10.1016/0191-2615(94)00022-R

Daganzo, C.F., 1996. The nature of freeway gridlock and how to prevent it. In: Lesort J.B., editor. Transportation and Traffic Theory, Proceedings of 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory.

Daganzo, 1997

Daganzo, 2002, A behavior theory of multi-lane traffic flow; I: long homogenous freeway sections; II: merges and the onset of congestion, Transportation Research Part B, 36, 131, 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00042-4

Daganzo, C.F., Laval, J., Muñoz, J.C., 2002. Ten strategies for freeway congestion mitigation with advanced technologies. California PATH Research Report, UCB-ITS-PRR-2002-3.

Diakaki, C., Papageorgiou, M., McLean, T., 2000. Integrated traffic-responsive urban corridor control strategy in Glasgow, Scotland–application and evaluation. In: Transportation Research Record 1856, TRB, Washington, DC, pp. 101–111.

Haj-Salem, 1995, Ramp metering impact on urban corridor traffic: field results, Transportation Research Part A, 29, 303

Haj-Salem, H., Poirier, P., Heylliard, J., Peynaud, J., 2001. ALINEA: a local traffic responsive strategy for ramp metering: field results on A6 Motorway in Paris, IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference Proceedings–Oakland (CA).

Minnesota Department of Transportation, 2001. Twin cities Ramp Evaluation, Executive Summary, Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Cambridge, Mass., 2001. <http://www.dot.state.mn.us/rampmeterstudy>.

Muñoz, 2002, Fingerprinting traffic from static freeway sensors, Cooperative Transportation Dynamics, 1, 1

Muñoz, 2002, The bottleneck mechanism of a freeway diverge, Transportation Research Part A, 36, 483

Newman, L., Dunnett, A., Meis, G., 1969. Freeway ramp control: what it can and cannot do, Los Angeles: California Division of Highways, District 7.

Papageorgiou, 2002, Freeway ramp metering: an overview, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 3, 10.1109/TITS.2002.806803

Papageorgiou, M., Hadj-Salem, H., Middelham, F., 1998. ALINEA local ramp metering-summary of field results. In: Transportation Research Record 1603, TRB, Washington, DC, pp. 90–98.

Smaragdis, 2003, A flow-maximizing adaptive local ramp metering strategy, Transportation Research Part B, 38, 251, 10.1016/S0191-2615(03)00012-2

Wattleworth, J.A., 1964. System demand-capacity analysis on the inbound Gulf Freeway. Texas Transportation Institute Research Report 24-8.