Implications of the response‐shift bias for management

1.Sprangers, M. and Hoogstraten, J., “Pretesting effects in retrospective pre‐test‐post‐test designs”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74 No. 2, 1989, pp. 265‐72.

2.Howard, G.S., “Response‐shift bias: a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self‐reports”, Evaluation Review, Vol. 4 No. 1, 1980, pp. 93‐106.

3.Mezoff, B., “How to get accurate self‐reports of training outcomes”, Training and Development Journal, September 1981..

4.Hoogsraten, J., “The retrospective pretest in an educational training context”, Journal of Experimental Education, No. 50, 1982, pp. 200‐04.

5.Howard, G.S. and Dailey, P.R., “Response‐shift bias: a source of contamination of self‐report measures”, Journal of Applied Psychology, No. 64, 1979, pp. 144‐50.

6.Conner, D., Managing at the Speed of Change, Villard Books, New York, NY, 1994.

7.Rosrow, J.M. and Zager, R., Training ‐ the Competitive Edge, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1988.

8.Gordon, J., “Who is being trained to do what?”, Training, No. 25, 1988, pp. 51‐60.

9.Ostroff, C., “Training effectiveness and scoring schemes: a comparison”, Personnel Psychology, No. 44, 1991, pp. 353‐74.

10.Goldstein, I.L., Training in Organisations, Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 1994.

11.Mann, S. and Robertson, I.T., “What should training evaluations evaluate?” (in preparation).

12.Sadri, G. and Robertson, I.T., “Self‐efficacy and work‐related behaviour; a review and meta‐analysis”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 42 No. 2, 1993, pp. 139‐52.

13.Bandura, A., “Gauging the relationship between self‐efficacy judgement and action”, Cognitive Theory and Research, No. 4, 1980, pp. 39‐66.

14.Bandura, A. and Adams, N.E., “Analysis of self‐efficacy theory of behavioural change”, Cognitive Theory and Research, No. 1, 1977, pp. 278‐310.