Các khái niệm bị tranh cãi trong lịch sử: Một lịch sử khái niệm về lòng hảo tâm ở Pháp, 1712-1914

Adcock, R. (2005). What is a concept? Committee on Concepts and Methods, Working Paper no. 1, International Political Science Association. Aeschylus. (1983). In M. Griffith (Ed.), Prometheus Bound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archambault, E. (1997). France. In L. M. Salamon & H. K. Anheier (Eds.), Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis (pp. 103–127). Manchester: Manchester University Press. Archambault, E. (2001). Historical roots of the nonprofit sector in France. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 204–220. Ball, T. (1998). Conceptual history and the history of political thought. In I. Hampsher-Monk, K. Tilmans, & F. van Vree (Eds.), History of concepts: Comparative perspectives (pp. 74–86). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Ball, T. (2002). Confessions of a conceptual historian. Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory, 6(1), 11–31. Ball, T., Farr, J., & Hanson, R. L. (1989). Political innovation and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Balzac, H. de (1900). The Village Rector. (K. P. Wormeley, Trans.) (Vol. 32). Boston: Hardy, Pratt & Co. Bastiat, F. (1850). La Loi. Paris: Guillaumin et cie. Beaurepaire, P.-Y. (2008). De la charité à la philanthropie, de la bienfaisance à la lutte contre l’exclusion. Voyage au cœur du projet philosophique et de société de la franc-maçonnerie (XVIIIe-XXIe siècles). La Pensée et les Hommes, 51(66), 71–79. Bec, C. (Ed.). (1994). Philanthropies et politiques sociales en Europe: (XVIIIe-XXe siècles). Paris: Anthropos-Economica. Blais, M.-C. (2008). La solidarité. Le Télémaque, 1(33), 9–24. Bödeker, H. E. (1998). Concept, meaning, discourse: Begriffsgeschichte reconsidered. In I. Hampsher-Monk, K. Tilmans, & F. van Vree (Eds.), History of concepts: Comparative perspectives (pp. 51–64). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Bothello, J., & Djelic, M.-L. (2018). Evolving conceptualizations of organizational environmentalism: A path generation account. Organization Studies, 39(1), 93–119. Bourgeois, L. (1896). Solidarité. Paris: Armand Colin. Briscoe, F., & Safford, S. (2008). The Nixon-in-China effect: Activism, imitation, and the institutionalization of contentious practices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 460–491. Brown, F. (2006). Flaubert: A Life. London: Random House. Bucheli, M., & Wadhwani, R. D. (Eds.). (2014). Organizations in time: History, theory, methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Care, N. S. (1973). On fixing social concepts. Ethics, 84(1), 10–21. Castel, R. (1995). Les Métamorphoses de la question sociale: Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard. Chantin, J.-P. (2003). Les adeptes de la théophilanthropie. Rives méditerranéennes, 2(14), 63–73. Chateaubriand, F.-R. de (1902). The Memoirs of Francois René Vicomte de Chateaubriand, Sometime Ambassador to England. (A. Texeira de Mattos, Trans.) (Vols. 1–6, Vol. 6). London: Freemantle. Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(3), 363–376. Clarke, J. A. (1964). Turgot’s critique of perpetual endowments. French Historical Studies, 3(4), 495–506. Cohen, W. B. (2003). Epilogue: The European comparison. In L. J. Friedman & M. D. McGarvie (Eds.), Charity, philanthropy, and civility in American history (pp. 385–411). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Coing, H. (1981). Remarks on the history of foundations and their role in the promotion of learning. Minerva, 19(2), 271–281. Collier, D., Hidalgo, F. D., & Maciuceanu, A. O. (2006). Essentially contested concepts: Debates and applications. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(3), 211–246. Dachez, R. (2015). Histoire de la franc-maçonnerie française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Daly, S. (2011). Philanthropy as an essentially contested concept. Voluntas, 23(3), 535–557. Dean, M. (1992). A genealogy of the government of poverty. Economy and Society, 21(3), 215–251. Debiesse, F. (2007). Le mécénat. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Dedeyan, N. (1983). Histoire de la Société philanthropique de Paris: 1780–1980. Paris: Société philanthropique. Delalande, N. (2011). L’entrée en philanthropie des Rothschild : l’hôpital israélite de Paris (1852-1914). Archives juives, 44(1), 54–69. Djelic, M.-L. (1998). Exporting the American model: The post-war transformation of European business. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Djelic, M.-L., & Bothello, J. (2013). Limited liability and its moral hazard implications: The systemic inscription of instability in contemporary capitalism. Theory and Society, 42(6), 589–615. Draper, H. (1971). The principle of self-emancipation in Marx and Engels. Socialist Register, 8, 81–109. Duprat, C. (1993). Le temps des philanthropes: la philanthropie parisienne des Lumières à la monarchie de Juillet. Paris: Éd. du C.T.H.S. Duprat, C. (1996). Usage et pratiques de la philanthropie: Pauvreté, action sociale et lien social à Paris, au cours du premier XIXe siècle (Vol. 1-2). Paris: Comité d’histoire de la sécurité sociale. Earl, D. (2007). Concepts. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://www.iep.utm.edu/concepts/. Accessed 4 Nov 2018. Elwitt, S. (1986). The Third Republic defended: Bourgeois reform in France, 1880–1914. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press. Engels, F. (1845). Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse in England. Leipzig: Otto Wigand. Ewald, F. (1986). L’état providence. Paris: Grasset. Farr, J. (1982). Historical concepts in political science: The case of “revolution.”. American Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 688–708. Farr, J. (1989). Understanding conceptual change politically. In T. Ball, J. Farr, & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Political innovation and conceptual change (pp. 24–49). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Farr, J. (2004). Social capital: A conceptual history. Political Theory, 32(1), 6–33. Fénelon, F. de. (1830). Dialogues des morts. In Oeuvres Choisies (Vol. 2). Paris: Hachette. Fisher, D. (1983). The role of philanthropic foundations in the reproduction and production of hegemony: Rockefeller foundations and the social sciences. Sociology, 17(2), 206–233. Fiss, P. C., Kennedy, M. T., & Davis, G. F. (2012). How Golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science, 23(4), 1077–1099. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. Foucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76-100). New York: Pantheon Books. Fourier, C. (1847). De l’Anarchie industrielle et scientifique. Paris: Librairie phalanstérienne. Freeden, M. (1994). Political concepts and ideological morphology. Journal of Political Philosophy, 2(2), 140–164. Friedman, L. J., & McGarvie, M. D. (Eds.). (2003). Charity, philanthropy, and civility in American history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Frumkin, P. (2006). Strategic giving: The art and science of philanthropy. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press. Furet, F. (1981). Interpreting the French revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Furet, F. (1995). Revolutionary France: 1770–1880. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167–198. Gautier, A., Pache, A.-C., & Mossel, V. (2015). Giving in France: A philanthropic renewal after decades of distrust. In P. Wiepking & F. Handy (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy (pp. 137–154). London: Palgrave MacMillan. Gérando, J.-M. de (1821). Le visiteur du pauvre. Paris: Jules Renouard. Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for? American Political Science Review, 98(2), 341–354. Giddens, A. (1979). Agency, structure. In Central problems in social theory (pp. 49–95). London: Macmillan. Gill, M. J., Gill, D. J., & Roulet, T. J. (2018). Constructing trustworthy historical narratives: Criteria, principles and techniques: Trustworthy historical narratives. British Journal of Management, 29(1), 191–205. Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A User’s guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gothot-Mersch, C. (1997). Autour de la philanthropie. Réseaux de motifs obsessionnels chez Flaubert Bulletin de l’académie royale de langue et de littérature françaises de Belgique, (3–4), 397–410. Green, S. E., Li, Y., & Nohria, N. (2009). Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 11–36. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91. Hampsher-Monk, I., Tilmans, K., & van Vree, F. (Eds.). (1998). History of concepts: Comparative perspectives. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Harvey, C., Maclean, M., Gordon, J., & Shaw, E. (2011). Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. Business History, 53(3), 425–450. Hatzfeld, H. (1971). Du paupérisme à la sécurité sociale, 1850–1940. Nancy: Presses universitaires de Nancy. Hayward, J. E. S. (1959). Solidarity: The social history of an idea in nineteenth century France. International Review of Social History, 4(2), 261–284. Henderson, G. D. (1952). Chevalier Ramsay. London: Nelson. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., & Lander, M. W. (2009). Structure! Agency! (and other quarrels): A meta-analysis of institutional theories of organization. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 61–85. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1987). The age of empire, 1875–1914. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. Hogu, L. (1920). Le mythe de Fénelon. Revue d’histoire de l’Église de France, 6(30), 5–14. Ilchman, W. F., Katz, S. N., & Queen, E. L. (1998). Philanthropy in the World’s traditions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Jones, C. (1982). Charity and Bienfaisance: The treatment of the poor in the Montpellier region 1740–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jung, J., & Mun, E. (2017). Does diffusion make an institutionally contested practice legitimate? Shareholder responses to downsizing in Japan, 1973–2005. Organization Studies, 38(10), 1347–1372. Kettering, S. (1988). Gift-giving and patronage in early modern France. French History, 2(2), 131–151. Komatsu, L. K. (1992). Recent views on conceptual structure. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 500–526. Koselleck, R. (2002). The practice of conceptual history: Timing history, spacing concepts. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Lambelet, A. (2014). La philanthropie. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po. Laurent, É. (1890). Les habitués des prisons de Paris: étude d’anthropologie et de psychologie criminelles. Paris: G. Masson. Leglaive-Perani, C. (2011). De la charité à la philanthropie. Archives Juives, 44(1), 4–16. Leroux, P. (1840). De l’humanité, de son principe et de son avenir. Paris: Perrotin. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage. Lustick, I. S. (1996). History, historiography, and political science: Multiple historical records and the problem of selection bias. American Political Science Review, 90(03), 605–618. Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016). Conceptualizing historical organization studies. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 609–632. Malthus, T. R. (1798). An essay on the principle of population. London: J. Johnson. Marais, J.-L. (1999). Histoire du don en France de 1800 à 1939: dons et legs charitables, pieux et philanthropiques. Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes. Margolis, E., & Laurence, S. (Eds.). (1999). Concepts: Core readings. Cambridge: MIT Press. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1844). Die heilige Familie. Frankfurt: Lowenthal. Mathiez, A. (1903). La théophilanthropie et le culte décadaire, 1796–1801: essai sur l’histoire religieuse de la révolution. Paris: Félix Alcan. Mavidal, J., & Laurent, É. (Eds.). (1867). Séance du mardi 19 mars 1793. In Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860. Première série, 1787 à 1799. (Vol. 60, pp. 322–328). Paris: P. Dupont. Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2004). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Miles, S. (2012). Stakeholder: Essentially contested or just confused? Journal of Business Ethics, 108(3), 285–298. Mitchell, A. (1991). The divided path: The German influence on social reform in France after 1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Mitsushima, N. (2017). Aménager, subvertir et contester l’ordre électoral. Genèses, 109, 32–56. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453. Naville, F. M. L. (1836). De la charité légale. Paris: Dufart. Nord, P. (1994). The welfare state in France, 1870-1914. French Historical Studies, 18(3), 821–838. Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627. Palonen, K. (2002). The history of concepts as a style of political theorizing Quentin Skinner’s and Reinhart Koselleck’s subversion of normative political theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 1(1), 91–106. Payton, R. L. (1988). Philanthropy: Voluntary action for the public good. New York: Macmillan. Pinkney, D. H. (1972). The French revolution of 1830. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pinloche, A. (1889). La réforme de l’éducation en Allemagne au dix-huitième siècle: Basedow et le philanthropinisme. Paris: Armand Colin. Proudhon, P.-J. (1848). Solution du problème social. Paris: Pilhes. Proudhon, P.-J. (1863). Du principe fédératif et de la nécessité de reconstituer le parti de la révolution. Paris: E. Dentu. Reich, R. (2018). Just giving: Why philanthropy is failing democracy and how it can do better. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Reich, R., Cordelli, C., & Bernholz, L. (2016). Philanthropy in democratic societies: History, institutions, values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Richter, M. (1995). The history of political and social concepts: A critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rosanvallon, P. (1981). La crise de l’État-providence. Paris: Seuil. Rosanvallon, P. (1990). L’État en France: de 1789 à nos jours. Paris: Seuil. Rosch, E., & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.). (1978). Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1992). In search of the non-profit sector. I: The question of definitions. Voluntas, 3(2), 125–151. Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248. Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. (2007). The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 33–56. Sartori, G. (1984). Guidelines for concept analysis. In Social science concepts: A systematic analysis (pp. 15–85). Beverly Hills: Sage. Schneider, W. H. (1990). Quality and quantity: The quest for biological regeneration in twentieth-century France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Seo, M.-G., & Creed, W. E. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. Silver, H. (1994). Social exclusion and social solidarity: Three paradigms. International Labour Review, 133, 531–578. Skinner, Q. (1969). Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory, 8(1), 3–53. Skinner, Q. (2002). Visions of Politics: Regarding Method (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smith, T. B. (1997). The ideology of charity, the image of the English poor law, and debates over the right to assistance in France, 1830–1905. The Historical Journal, 40(4), 997–1032. Somers, M. R. (1995a). Narrating and naturalizing civil society and citizenship theory: The place of political culture and the public sphere. Sociological Theory, 13(3), 229–274. Somers, M. R. (1995b). What’s political or cultural about political culture and the public sphere? Toward an historical sociology of concept formation. Sociological Theory, 13(2), 113–144. Spencer, H. (1851). Social statics. London: John Chapman. Stjernø, S. (2009). Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sue, E. (1844). Les mystères de Paris. Paris: Librairie Charles Gosselin. Sulek, M. (2010a). On the modern meaning of philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(2), 193–212. Sulek, M. (2010b). On the classical meaning of Philanthrôpía. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 385–408. Taylor, J. R. (2003). Linguistic categorization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tocqueville, A. de. (1997). Memoir on Pauperism. (S. Drescher, Trans.). London: Civitas. Tombs, R. (1996). France 1814 - 1914. London: Taylor & Francis. Topalov, C. (1996). Langage de la réforme et déni du politique. Le débat entre assistance publique et bienfaisance privée, 1889-1903. Genèses, 23(1), 30–52. Topalov, C. (1999). Laboratoires du nouveau siècle: la nébuleuse réformatrice et ses réseaux en France, 1880–1914. Paris: EHESS. Toussaint, F.-V. (1748). Les Moeurs. Lausanne: Bousquet. Veyne, P. (1990). Bread and circuses: Historical sociology and political pluralism. London: Penguin. Villermé, L.-R. (1840). Tableau de l’état physique et moral des ouvriers employés dans les manufactures de coton, de laine et de soie. Paris: Jules Renouard. Voltaire. (1764). Dictionnaire philosophique portatif. Genève: Gabriel Grasset. Waldron, J. (2002). Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)? Law and Philosophy, 21(2), 137–164. Weiss, J. H. (1983). Origins of the French welfare state: Poor relief in the Third Republic, 1871-1914. French Historical Studies, 13(1), 47–78. Wiepking, P., & Handy, F. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave handbook of global philanthropy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Zunz, O. (2011). Philanthropy in America: A history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.