Exercise for Depression: Cochrane systematic reviews are rigorous, but how subjective are the assessment of bias and the practice implications?

Cooney, GM, Dwan K, Greig CA, Lawlor DA, Rimer J, Waugh FR, et al. Exercise for depression. (Published online: 12 September 2013) <http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD004366/DEPRESSN_exercise-for-depression#sthash.xRre9nZz.dpuf>. Hyman, 2006, Mental disorders, 605 Beyond Blue. Treatments – for-depression. Beyond Blue Web Site: <http://www.beyondblue.org.au/the-facts/depression/treatments-for-depression>. Astin, 1998, Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study, JAMA, 279, 1548, 10.1001/jama.279.19.1548 Bracken, 2012, Psychiatry beyond the current paradigm, Br J Psychiatry, 201, 430, 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.109447 Turner, 2008, Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy, N Engl J Med, 358, 252, 10.1056/NEJMsa065779 Davidson, 2010, Major depressive disorder treatment guidelines in America and Europe, J Clin Psychiatry, 71, e04 Tendal, 2009, Disagreements in meta-analyses using outcomes measured on continuous or rating scales: observer agreement study, BMJ, 339, b3128, 10.1136/bmj.b3128 Rada, 2013, Risk of bias assessment of studies included in multiple Cochrane reviews: agreement between different reviews. The Cochrane Collaboration, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 213 Krogh, 2011, The effect of exercise in clinical depressed adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, J Clin Psychiatry, 72, 529, 10.4088/JCP.08r04913blu Bridle, 2012, Effect of exercise on depression severity in older people: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, Br J Psychiatry, 201, 180, 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.095174 Hartling, 2009, Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study, BMJ, 339, 1017, 10.1136/bmj.b4012 Armijo-Olivo, 2012, Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research, J Eval Clin Pract, 18, 12, 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x Hartling, 2012, Testing the Risk of Bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs, J Clin Epidemiol, 66, 973, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.005 Armijo-Olivo, 2014, Poor Reliability between Cochrane reviewers and blinded external reviewers when applying the Cochrane risk of bias tool in physical therapy trials, PLOS ONE, 9, e96920, 10.1371/journal.pone.0096920 Greenberg, 1989, Examining antidepressant effectiveness: findings ambiguities and some vexing puzzles, 1 Spedding, 2014, Cochrane corner commentary: do funding sources create bias’ Cochrane, Adv Integr Med, 10.1016/j.aimed.2014.08.002