Evolution of adult numeracy from quantitative literacy to numeracy: Lessons learned from international assessments

International Review of Education - Tập 66 - Trang 183-209 - 2020
Dave Tout1
1Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia

Tóm tắt

Historically, numeracy has tended to be forgotten and overlooked in adult education, especially compared to literacy. Yet evidence exists to show that numeracy should be made a priority, and that building the foundational numeracy skills of young people and adults is vital for their well-being in work and life in the 21st century. In the past three decades, there has been an increasing awareness of the role and importance of mathematics and numeracy skills in adult life. This concerns every adult as an individual, as a member of society and as a worker, and how proficiency in these areas is critical in underpinning the skills necessary to negotiate the challenges of 21st-century life. This article describes how this growing understanding and awareness of numeracy has been enhanced through the evolution of the assessment of numeracy in international adult skills surveys. It began with the International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS) in the 1990s, continued with the Adult Literacy and Lifeskills (ALL) survey in the mid-2000s, and in 2011 finally led to the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). The latter’s second cycle is due to start collecting data in 2021–2022 and the results are due to be published in 2023. The development and ongoing refinement of the theoretical frameworks and constructs that underpin these programmes and the assessments themselves, alongside the research based on the rich data of empirical and background information emerging from these surveys, have contributed significantly to our knowledge and understanding of numeracy in people’s lives.

Tài liệu tham khảo

AAMT & AiGroup (Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers and Australian Industry Group). (2014). Tackling the school–industry mathematics divide. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

Addey, C., & Sellar. S. E. (2019). Is it worth it? Rationales for (non)participation in international large-scale learning assessments. Education Research and Foresight Working Papers Series, No. 24. ED-2019/WP/2. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 2 March 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368421/PDF/368421eng.pdf.multi.

Baker, D., & Street, B. (1994). Literacy and numeracy: Concepts and definitions. In T. Husen & E. A. Postlethwaite (Eds.), Encyclopedia of education (Vol. 6, pp. 3453–3459). NY: Pergamon Press.

Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2003 [2000]). Literacy practices. In David Barton (Ed.), Situated literacies. Reading and writing in context (pp. 1–6). London: Routledge.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., et al. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17–66). New York: Springer.

Condelli, L., Safford-Ramus, K., Sherman, R., Coben, D., Gal. I., & Hector-Mason, A. (2006). A review of the literature in adult numeracy: Research and conceptual issues. Washington DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved 2 March 2020 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495456.pdf.

FYA (Foundation for Young Australians) (2017). The New Basics: Big data reveals the skills young people need for the New Work Order. Melbourne VIC: Foundation for Young Australians. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://www.fya.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/The-New-Basics_Update_Web.pdf.

Evans, J., Yasukawa, K., Mallows, D., & Creese, B. (2017). Numerical skills and the numerate environment: Affordances and demands. Adults Learning Mathematics, 12(1), 17–26.

Gal, I. (2016). Assessment of adult numeracy skills. Background paper commissioned for the UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report 2016. Report number: ED/GEMR/MRT/2016/P1/8 REV, Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245573.

Gal, I., van Groenestijn, M., Manly, M., Schmitt, M.J., & Tout, D. (2005). Adult numeracy and its assessment in the ALL survey: A conceptual framework and pilot results. In Murray, S. T., Clermont, Y., & Binkley, M. (Eds), Measuring adult literacy and life skills: New frameworks for assessment (pp. 137–191). Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/89-552-m/89-552-m2005013-eng.pdf?st=JBzir8Ag.

Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531–548.

Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. New York: Springer.

Grotlüschen, A., Mallows, D., Reder, S., & Sabatini, J. (2016). Adults with low proficiency in literacy or numeracy. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 131, EDU/WKP(2016)5. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/5jm0v44bnmnx-en.

Grotlüschen, A., Nienkemper, B., & Duncker-Euringer, C. (2020). International assessment of low reading proficiency in the adult population: A question of components or lower rungs? International Review of Education, online first. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09829-y.

Hamilton, M., Maddox, B., & Addey, C. (Eds.). (2015). Literacy as numbers: Researching the politics and practices of international literary assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hoogland, K., de Koning, J., Bakker, A., Pepin, B. E. U., & Gravemeijer, K. (2018). Changing representation in contextual mathematical problems from descriptive to depictive: The effect on students’ performance. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 122–131.

Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., & Bakker, A. (2010). Improving mathematics at work: The need for techno-mathematical literacies. London and New York: Routledge.

Hoyles, C., Wolf, A., Molyneux-Hodson, S., & Kent, P. (2002). Mathematical skills in the workplace. Final report to the Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. London: Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1515581/1/Hoyles2002MathematicalSkills.pdf.

Jonas, N. (2018). Numeracy practices and numeracy skills among adults. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 177. EDU/WKP(2018)13. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/8f19fc9f-en.

Jorgensen, R. (2011). Young workers and their dispositions towards mathematics: Tensions of a mathematical habitus in the retail industry. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 87–100.

Kent, P., Bakker, A., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2011). Measurement in the workplace: The case of process improvement in manufacturing industry. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(5), 747–758.

Kirsch, I. S., Jungeblut, A., Jenkins, L., & Kolstad, A. (Eds.). (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.

Maddox, B. (Ed.). (2018). International large-scale assessments in education: Insider research perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.

Madison, B., & Steen, L. A. (Eds.). (2003). Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. Princeton, NJ: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines.

Murray, S., Clermont, Y., & Binkley, M. (Eds) (2005). Measuring adult literacy and life skills: New frameworks for Assessment. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/89-552-m/89-552-m2005013-eng.pdf?st=JBzir8Ag.

NCES (National Centre for Educational Statistics) (n.d.). International Adult Literacy Survey (IALS) [dedicated webpage]. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences (IES)/National Center for Education Statistics (NCER). Retrieved 9 March 2020 from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ials/.

NCES. (1997). The International Adult Literacy Survey: A technical report. Washington, DC: National Centre for Educational Statistics.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2013). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en.

OECD (2016a). Skills matter: Further results from the Survey of Adult Skills, Paris: OECD Skills Studies series, OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264258051-en.

OECD (2016b). Technical report of the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) (2nd edn), Paris: OECD Skills Studies series, OECD Publishing. Retrieved 8 April 2020 from http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/PIAAC_Technical_Report_2nd_Edition_Full_Report.pdf .

OECD (2019). Skills matter: Additional results from the Survey of Adult Skills, Paris: OECD Skills Studies series. OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/1f029d8f-en.

OECD & HRDC (Human Resources Development Canada) (1997). Literacy skills for the knowledge society: Further results from the International Adult Literacy Survey, Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://vital.voced.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/ngv:32828/SOURCE2?view=true

OECD &Statistics Canada (1995). Literacy, economy and society: Results of the first International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris/Ottawa, ON: OECD Publishing/Statistics Canada. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/41529765.pdf.

OECD & Statistics Canada (2005). Learning a living: First results of the Adult Literacy and Life Skills Survey. Paris/Ottawa, ON: OECD Publishing/Statistics Canada. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://www.oecd.org/education/innovation-education/34867438.pdf.

OUP (Oxford University Press). (n.d.). Gig economy. In Lexico.com [online dictionary]. Detroit, MI: Lexico.com. Retrieved 16 March 2020 from https://www.lexico.com/definition/gig_economy.

P21 (Partnership for 21st Century Skills) (2016). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved 3 Marc 2020 from http://static.battelleforkids.org/documents/p21/P21_Framework_Brief.pdf.

Palm, T. (2006). Word problems as simulations of real-world situations: a proposed framework. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 42–47.

Palm, T. (2008a). Impact of authenticity on sense making in word problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 37–58.

Palm, T. (2008b). Performance assessment and authentic assessment: a conceptual analysis of the literature. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 13, Art. 4.

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

PIAAC NEG (Programme in Assessment of Adult Competencies Numeracy Expert Group) (2009). PIAAC numeracy: A conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 35. EDU/WKP(2009)14. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/220337421165.

Reder, S. (2009). Scaling up and moving in: Connecting social practices views to policies and programs in adult education. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 16(2)/17(1), 35–50.

Ryan, J. (1990). International Literacy Year, 1990: From rhetoric to reality. UNESCO Courier, XLII(7), 10–12. Retrieved 10 March 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000086187?posInSet=1&queryId=36a2e882-01c4-4cb3-9fd9-d926065868a1.

Sabatini, J. P., & Bruce, K. M. (2009). PIAAC reading component: A conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 33. EDU/WKP(2009)12. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/220367414132.

Stacey, K. (2015). The real world and the mathematical world. In K. Stacey & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience (pp. 57–84). New York: Springer.

Straesser, R. (2015). “Numeracy at work”: A discussion of terms and results from empirical studies. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 665–674.

Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: what are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1–24.

Tout, D. (2014). Buried or not? What’s happened to numeracy? Research Developments [blogpost 29 July]. Melbourne: ACER. Retrieved 29 November 2019 from http://rd.acer.edu.au/article/buried-or-not-whats-happened-to-numeracy.

Tout, D., & Schmitt, M. J. (2002). The inclusion of numeracy in adult basic education. In J. Comings, B. Garner, & C. Smith (Eds.), Annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 3, pp. 152–202). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Tout, D., Coben, D., Geiger, V., Ginsburg, L., Hoogland, K., Maguire, T., Thomson, S., & Turner, R. (2017). Review of the PIAAC numeracy assessment framework: Final report. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved 29 November 2019 from https://research.acer.edu.au/transitions_misc/29.

Tout, D., Demonty, I., Díez-Palomar, J., Geiger, V., Hoogland, K., & Maguire, T. (forthcoming). PIAAC numeracy: An assessment framework for the second cycle of the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

UN (United Nations) (1987). International literacy year. Resolution A/RES/42/104. New York: United Nations General Assembly. Retrieved 9 March 2020 from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/152995?ln=en.

UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2016a). Incheon declaration and Framework for action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning opportunities for all. Education 2030. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 26 April 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245656.

UNESCO (2016b). Target 4.6: Literacy and numeracy. In UNESCO, Global Education Monitoring Report 2016. Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all (chapter 15; pp. 274–285). Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 29 November 2019 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002457/245752e.pdf.

Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & Van Dooren, W. (Eds.). (2009). Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Wake, G. (2015). Preparing for workplace numeracy: a modelling perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(4), 675–689.

Weeks, K. W., Higginson, R., Clochesy, J. M., & Coben, D. (2013). Safety in numbers 7. Veni, vidi, duci: A grounded theory evaluation of nursing students’ medication dosage calculation problem-solving schemata construction. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(2), e78–e87.

Wickert, R. & Kevin, M. (1995). No single measure: The final report. Canberra, ACT: Department of Employment, Education and Training.

Windisch, H. C. (2015), Adults with low literacy and numeracy skills: A literature review on policy intervention. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 123. EDU/WKP(2015)12. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved 3 March 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrxnjdd3r5k-en.

Yasukawa, K., Rogers, A., Jackson, K., & Street, B. (Eds.). (2018). Numeracy as social practice: Global and local perspectives. New York and London: Routledge.

Zevenbergen, R. (2004). Technologizing numeracy: Intergenerational differences in working mathematically in new times. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 97–117.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Review of Education

Tập 66

183-209

Thông tin tác giả