Economic sustainability modeling provides decision support for assessing hybrid poplar-based biofuel development in California

AspenTech. 2011. Aspen Plus user guide (v7.3). Burlington, MA.

Berguson B, Eaton J, Stanton B. 2010. Development of hybrid poplar for commercial production in the United States: The Pacific Northwest and Minnesota experience. In: Braun R, Karlen D, Johnson D (eds.). Sustainable Alternative Fuel Feedstock Opportunities, Challenges and Roadmaps for Six U.S. Regions. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society. p 282-99.

Baum, 2009, Landbauforsch vTI Ag, 3, 183

Crawford JT. 2013. Techno-economic analysis of hydrocarbon biofuels from poplar biomass. Master's thesis, University of Washington. https://digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/handle/1773/25142 (accessed March 16, 2014).

Fairley, 2011, Nature, 474, S2, 10.1038/474S02a

Garten, 2002, Biomass Bioenerg, 23, 93, 10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00033-8

Jenkins, 2009, Calif Agr, 63, 168, 10.3733/ca.v063n04p168

Jenner M, Kaffka S. 2012. California Energy Commission Draft Report: Energy Crop Assessement in California Using Optimization Modeling. http://energy.ucdavis. edu/files/05-13-2013-3-2-1-1-energy-crops-and-residue-assessment.pdf (accessed April 22, 2014). 34 p.

Johnson, 2010, Photogramm Eng Rem S, 76, 1201

Landsberg, 1997, Forest Ecol Manag, 95, 209, 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00026-1

Leduc, 2010, Energy, 35, 2709, 10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.018

Morrison G, Eggert A, Yeh S, et al. 2014. Summary of California Climate Policy Modeling Forum. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2401929 (accessed September 19, 2014).

Netzer M, Goslee K, Pearson TRH, Brown S. 2010. Opportunity Assessment for Establishing Hybrid Poplars in California, Oregon and Washington. California Energy Commission, PIER program. 500-2014-044. http://uc-ciee.org/downloads/30_Poplars%20CA_OR_WA.pdf (accessed July 12, 2015). 58 p.

Parker, 2010, Biomass Bioenerg, 34, 1597, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.06.007

Pearson, 2010, Ind Crop Prod, 31, 492, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.01.011

PRé Consultants. 2012. SimaPro 7 (v.7.3.3). Amersfoort, Netherlands.

Prilepova, 2014, ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf, 3, 929, 10.3390/ijgi3030929

Shock, 2002, West J Appl For, 17, 46, 10.1093/wjaf/17.1.46

Schnepf R. 2014. Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP): Status and Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/crs/R41296.pdf (accessed June 10, 2014). 20 p.

Ugarte DG, Walsh ME, Shapouri H, Slinsky P. 2003. The economic impacts of bioenergy crop production in US agriculture. USDA Agricultural Economic Report No. 816. Washington, DC: USDA. 49 p.

[USDA] US Department of Agriculture. 2010. Quick Stats, U.S. & All States County Data-Crops. Washington, DC: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. http://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ (accessed April 1, 2014).

US Energy Information Administration. 2015. Annual crude oil and jet fuel prices. California kerosene-type jet fuel retail sales by refiners (dollars per gallon). www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=EMA_EPJK_PTG_SCA_DPG&f=M (accessed August 9, 2015).

Verser D, Eggeman TJ. 2011. Process for producing ethanol. US Patent 7,964,379 B2, filed Jan 26, 2010. ZeaChem, Inc. www.google.com/patents/US7964379.

Wang, 2013, Ecol App, 23, 944, 10.1890/12-0854.1

Werner, 2012, GCB Bioenerg, 4, 642, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01180.x

Xue, 2014, Int J Agric Biol Eng, 7, 10

Yemshanov, 2008, Biomass Bioenerg, 32, 185, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.09.010

Youngs H, Somerville CR. 2013. California's Energy Future - The Potential for Biofuels. California Council on Science and Technology report. http://www.ccst.us/news/2013/0531cef.php (accessed April 3, 2014).