Costs and benefits of forest conservation: regional and local comparisons in Eastern Finland

Journal of Forest Economics - Tập 8 - Trang 131-150 - 2002
Matleena Kniivilä1, Ville Ovaskainen2, Olli Saastamoinen1
1University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry, Joensuu, Finland
2Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alward, 1992, Regional economic impact analysis for Alaskan wildlife resources, 61 Arrow, 1993, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Federal Register, 58, 4601 Ayer, 1955, An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 641, 10.1214/aoms/1177728423 Barrick, 1990, Magnitude and distribution of option value for the Washakie Wilderness, Northern Wyoming, USA, Environmental Management, 14, 367, 10.1007/BF02394205 Bergstrom, 1982, When is a man's life worth more than his human capital Berrens, 1999, Incorporating distributional considerations in the safe minimum standard approach: endangered species and local impacts, Ecological Economics, 30, 461, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00034-8 Blamey, 1996, Citizens, consumers and contingent valuation: Clarification and the expression of citizen values and issue-opinions, 103 Blamey, 1995, Respondents to contingent valuation surveys: consumers or citizens?, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol., 39, 263, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1995.tb00554.x Bowker, 1988, Use of dichotomous choice non-market methods to value the whooping crane resource, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70, 372, 10.2307/1242078 Boyle, 1988, Validation of empirical measures of welfare change: Comment, Land Economics, 64, 94, 10.2307/3146613 Dasgupta, 1978 Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, 1998 Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, 1999 Finnish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry, 2000 Global Biodiversity Strategy, 1992, Guidelines for Action to Save, Study and Use Earth's Biotic Wealth Sustainably and Equitably, World Resources Institute (WRI), The World Conservation Union (IUCN) and United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Hagen, 1992, Benefits of preserving old-growth forests and the spotted owl, Contemporary Policy Issues, Vol X, 13, 10.1111/j.1465-7287.1992.tb00221.x Hamilton, 1991, Economic impacts, value added, and benefits in regional project analysis, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 334, 10.2307/1242718 Hanemann, 1989, Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: reply, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 1057, 10.2307/1242685 Hanemann, 1998, The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data, 110 Hildén, 1998, Natura 2000 – verkoston vaikutusten arviointi, Suomen ympäristö 201. Suomen ympäristökeskus, 201, 90 Hildén, 1999, Kansallisen metsäohjelman ympäristövaikutusten arviointi, Loppuraportti, 17 Hoen, 1993, Multiple use forestry and preservation of coniferous forests in Norway, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 266, 10.1080/02827589309382776 Huhtala, 2001, Kansallispuistojen arvo vai virkistyspalveluiden hinta – miten mitata rahassa valtion tuottamia markkinattomia hyötyjä, 802, 77 Jaakko Pöyry Consulting Oy (1996)Pohjois-Suomen ja Pohjois-Karjalan vanhojen metsien suojelun kustannukset. Helsinki. Johansson, 1984, Disequilibrium cutting rules, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 14, 321, 10.1139/x84-059 Johansson, 1993 Johansson, 1989, A note on welfare evaluations with discrete response data, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 1054, 10.2307/1242684 Johansson, 1985 Kasanen, 1989, Ympäristöhyötyjen arvottaminen ja mittaaminen – valikoiva kirjallisuuskatsaus, Terra, 101, 224 Kriström, 1990, Valuing environmental benefits using the contingent valuation method, 219 Kriström, 1997, Spike Models in Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1013, 10.2307/1244440 Leppänen, 2000, Metsien suojelun taloudelliset ja sosiaaliset vaikutukset, Metsäntutkimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 775 Lockwood, 1993, A contingent valuation survey and benefit-cost analysis of forest preservation in East Gippsland, Australia, Journal of Environmental Management, 38, 233, 10.1006/jema.1993.1042 Loomis, 1993, Some empirical evidence on embedding effects in contingent valuation of forest protection, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25, 45, 10.1006/jeem.1993.1025 Mattsson, 1993, The non-timber value of northern Swedish forests, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 426, 10.1080/02827589309382789 McCollum, 1992, Measuring net economic value and regional economic impact, 135 Milgrom, 1993, Is sympathy an economic value? Philosophy, economics, and the contingent valuation method, 417 Mitchell, 1989, Using surveys to value public goods Nas, 1996, Cost-benefit analysis Niskanen, 1996, Pohjois-Suomen ja Pohjois-Karjalan vanhojen metsien suojelun kustannukset Ovaskainen, 2001, Retkeilyalueiden ja kansallispuistojen virkistyskäytön arvo, 800, 215 Ovaskainen V, and Kniivilä M (2002) Consumer preferences vs. citizen values in Contingent Valuation: The role of question framing and format. Unpublished manuscript Pope, 1990, Value of wilderness designation in Utah, Journal of Environmental Management, 30, 157, 10.1016/0301-4797(90)90013-M Pouta, 2000, Contingent valuation of the Natura 2000 nature conservation programme in Finland, Forestry, Vol., 73, 119, 10.1093/forestry/73.2.119 Rekola, 2000, Incommensurable preferences in contingent valuation: the case of Natura 2000 Network in Finland, Environmental Conservation, 27, 260, 10.1017/S0376892900000291 Rogers, 1994, Safe Minimum Standard for environmental choices: old-growth forest in New South Wales, Journal of Environmental Management, 41, 89, 10.1006/jema.1994.1036 Rubin, 1991, A benefit-cost analysis of the northern spotted owl, Results from a contingent valuation survey. Journal of Forestry, 89, 25 Schofield, 1987 Siitonen M, Härkönen K, Hirvelä H, Jämsä J, Kilpeläinen H, Salminen O, and Teuri M (1996) Mela Handbook. 1996 Edition. Finnish Forest Research Institute, Research Papers 622 Swanson CS, and Loomis JB (1996) Role of non-market economic values in benefit-cost analysis of public forest management. USDA Forest Service, Pasific Northwest Research Station, General Technical Report 361 Van Kooten, 1995, Economics of protecting wilderness areas and old-growth timber in British Columbia, The Forestry Chronicle, 71, 52, 10.5558/tfc71052-1 Van Kooten, 1999, How much primary coastal temperate rain forest should society retain? Carbon uptake, recreation, and other values, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 1879, 10.1139/x99-173 Veisten, 1993