Connectomics and new approaches for analyzing human brain functional connectivity

Oxford University Press (OUP) - Tập 4 - Trang 1-12 - 2015
R Cameron Craddock1,2, Rosalia L Tungaraza1, Michael P Milham1,2
1Center for Biomedical Imaging and Neuromodulation, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, USA
2Center for the Developing Brain, Child Mind Institute, New York, USA

Tóm tắt

Estimating the functional interactions between brain regions and mapping those connections to corresponding inter-individual differences in cognitive, behavioral and psychiatric domains are central pursuits for understanding the human connectome. The number and complexity of functional interactions within the connectome and the large amounts of data required to study them position functional connectivity research as a “big data” problem. Maximizing the degree to which knowledge about human brain function can be extracted from the connectome will require developing a new generation of neuroimaging analysis algorithms and tools. This review describes several outstanding problems in brain functional connectomics with the goal of engaging researchers from a broad spectrum of data sciences to help solve these problems. Additionally it provides information about open science resources consisting of raw and preprocessed data to help interested researchers get started.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Biswal BB, Mennes M, Zuo X-N, Gohel S, Kelly C, Smith SM, et al. Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107(10):4734–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0911855107.

Mennes M, Biswal BB, Castellanos FX, Milham MP. Making data sharing work: the FCP/INDI experience. NeuroImage. 2013; 82:683–91. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.10.064.

Rosen B, Wedeen VJ, Horn JDV, Fischl B, Buckner RL, Wald L, et al. The Human Connectome Project. In: Proceedings Organization for Human Brain Mapping 16th Annual Meeting. Barcelona: 2010.

Van Essen DC, Ugurbil K. The future of the human connectome. NeuroImage. 2012; 62(2):1299–310. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.032.

Jiang T. Brainnetome: a new -ome to understand the brain and its disorders. NeuroImage. 2013; 80:263–72. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.002.

Assaf Y, Alexander DC, Jones DK, Bizzi A, Behrens TEJ, Clark Ca, et al. The CONNECT project: Combining macro- and micro-structure. NeuroImage. 2013; 80:273–82. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.055.

Jernigan TL, McCabe C, Chang L, Akshoomoff N, Newman E, Dale AM, et al, Pediatric Imaging Neurocognition and Genetics (PING) Study. Accessed 12 13 2014. http://pingstudy.ucsd.edu.

Satterthwaite TD, Elliott MA, Ruparel K, Loughead J, Prabhakaran K, Calkins ME, et al. Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia neurodevelopmental cohort. Neuroimage. 2014; 86:544–53. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3947233PMC3947233] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.064] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2392110123921101].

Buckner RL, Roffman JL, Smoller JW. Brain Genomics Superstruct Project (GSP). doi:10.7910/DVN/25833.

NIMH. National Database for Autism Research (NDAR). Accessed 12 13 2014. http://ndar.nih.gov.

Nooner KB, Colcombe SJ, Tobe RH, Mennes M, Benedict MM, Moreno AL, et al. The nki-rockland sample: A model for accelerating the pace of discovery science in psychiatry. Front Neurosc. 2012; 6:152. doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00152.

Craddock RC, Jbabdi S, Yan C-G, Vogelstein JT, Castellanos FX, Di Martino A, et al. Imaging human connectomes at the macroscale. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(6):524–39. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2482.

Varela F, Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J. The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(4):229–39. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/3506755010.1038/35067550] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1128374611283746].

Aguirre G. Number of neurons in a voxel. Accessed 12 13 2014. 2014. https://cfn.upenn.edu/aguirre/wiki/public:neurons_in_a_voxel.

Behrens TE, Sporns O. Human connectomics. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012; 22(1):144–53. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3294015PMC3294015] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2011.08.00510.1016/j.conb.2011.08.005] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2190818321908183].

Biswal B, Yetkin FZ, Haughton VM, Hyde JS. Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1995; 34(4):537–41. [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/85240218524021].

Varoquaux G, Craddock RC. Learning and comparing functional connectomes across subjects. NeuroImage. 2013; 80:405–15. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.007.

Kapur S, Phillips AG, Insel TR. Why has it taken so long for biological psychiatry to develop clinical tests and what to do about it?Mol Psychiat. 2012; 17(12):1174–9. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2012.10510.1038/mp.2012.105] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2286903322869033].

Sporns O, Tononi G, Kötter R. The human connectome: A structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol. 2005; 1(4):42. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042.

Hagmann P. From diffusion MRI to brain connectomics. PhD thesis. Lausanne: STI; 2005. doi:10.5075/epfl-thesis-3230. http://vpaa.epfl.ch/page14976.html.

Kelly C, Biswal BB, Craddock RC, Castellanos FX, Milham MP. Characterizing variation in the functional connectome: promise and pitfalls. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul Ed). 2012; 16(3):181–8. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3882689PMC3882689] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.00110.1016/j.tics.2012.02.001] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2234121122341211].

Thirion B, Varoquaux G, Dohmatob E, Poline JB. Which fMRI clustering gives good brain parcellations?Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:167. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4076743PMC4076743] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.0016710.3389/fnins.2014.00167] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2507142525071425].

Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn BT, Dickerson BC, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on {MRI} scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage. 2006; 31(3):968–80. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021.

Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, et al. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage. 2002; 15(1):273–89.

Eickhoff SB, Rottschy C, Kujovic M, Palomero-Gallagher N, Zilles K. Organizational principles of human visual cortex revealed by receptor mapping. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18(11):2637–45. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn024. http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/18/11/2637.full.pdf+html.

Bellec P, Perlbarg V, Jbabdi S, Pelegrini-Issac M, Anton JL, Doyon J, et al. Identification of large-scale networks in the brain using fMRI. Neuroimage. 2006; 29(4):1231–43. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.044] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16246590].

Craddock RC, James GA, Iii PEH, Hu XP, Mayberg HS. A whole brain fMRI atlas generated via spatially constrained spectral clustering. Hum Brain Mapp.2012;33(8). doi:10.1002/hbm.21333.A.

Blumensath T, Jbabdi S, Glasser MF, Van Essen DC, Ugurbil K, Behrens TE, et al. Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2013; 76:313–24. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3758955] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.024] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23523803].

Thirion B, Flandin G, Pinel P, Roche A, Ciuciu P, Poline JB. Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: multi-subject parcellation of fMRI datasets. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006; 27(8):678–93. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20210] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16281292].

Zalesky A, Fornito A, Harding IH, Cocchi L, Yucel M, Pantelis C, et al. Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter?Neuroimage. 2010; 50(3):970–83. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.027] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20035887].

Flandin G, Kherif F, Pennec X, Riviere D, Ayache N, Poline J-B. Parcellation of brain images with anatomical and functional constraints for fmri data analysis. In: Biomedical Imaging, 2002. Proceedings. 2002 IEEE International Symposium On: 2002. p. 907–910. doi:10.1109/ISBI.2002.1029408.

Smith SM, Miller KL, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann CF, Nichols TE, et al. Network modelling methods for FMRI. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(2):875–91. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20817103].

Ryali S, Chen T, Supekar K, Menon V. Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty. Neuroimage. 2012; 59(4):3852–61. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3288428] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.054] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22155039].

Friston KJ. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994; 2(1-2):56–78. doi:10.1002/hbm.460020107.

Buchel C, Friston KJ. Modulation of connectivity in visual pathways by attention: cortical interactions evaluated with structural equation modelling and fMRI. Cereb Cortex. 1997; 7(8):768–78. [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9408041].

Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W. Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage. 2003; 19(4):1273–302. [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12948688].

Zhuang J, LaConte S, Peltier S, Zhang K, Hu X. Connectivity exploration with structural equation modeling: an fMRI study of bimanual motor coordination. Neuroimage. 2005; 25(2):462–70. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.11.007] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15784425].

Penny WD, Stephan KE, Daunizeau J, Rosa MJ, Friston KJ, Schofield TM, et al. Comparing families of dynamic causal models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(3):1000709. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2837394] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000709] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20300649].

James GA, Kelley ME, Craddock RC, Holtzheimer PE, Dunlop BW, Nemeroff CB, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling of resting-state fMRI: applicability of group models to individual subjects. Neuroimage. 2009; 45(3):778–87. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2653594] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.049] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19162206].

Lohmann G, Erfurth K, Müller K, Turner R. Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling. NeuroImage. 2012; 59(3):2322–9. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.025.

Deshpande G, Santhanam P, Hu X. Instantaneous and causal connectivity in resting state brain networks derived from functional MRI data. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(2):1043–52. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997120] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.024] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20850549].

Lv Y, Margulies DS, Cameron Craddock R, Long X, Winter B, Gierhake D, et al. Identifying the perfusion deficit in acute stroke with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol. 2013; 73(1):136–40. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.23763] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378326.].

Craddock RC, Milham MP, LaConte SM. Predicting intrinsic brain activity. Neuroimage. 2013; 82:127–36. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.072] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23707580].

James GA, Lu ZL, VanMeter JW, Sathian K, Hu XP, Butler AJ. Changes in resting state effective connectivity in the motor network following rehabilitation of upper extremity poststroke paresis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009; 16(4):270–81. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595191] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/tsr1604-270] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19740732].

Brodersen KH, Schofield TM, Leff AP, Ong CS, Lomakina EI, Buhmann JM, et al. Generative embedding for model-based classification of fMRI data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011; 7(6):1002079. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3121683] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002079] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21731479].

Hutchison RM, Womelsdorf T, Allen EA, Bandettini PA, Calhoun VD, Corbetta M, et al. Dynamic functional connectivity: promise, issues, and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2013; 80:360–78.

Keilholz SD, Magnuson ME, Pan WJ, Willis M, Thompson GJ. Dynamic properties of functional connectivity in the rodent. Brain Connect. 2013; 3(1):31–40. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621313] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0115] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23106103].

Chang C, Glover GH. Time-frequency dynamics of resting-state brain connectivity measured with fMRI. 2010; 50(1):81–98. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2827259] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.011] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20006716].

Yang Z, Craddock RC, Margulies DS, Yan CG, Milham MP. Common intrinsic connectivity states among posteromedial cortex subdivisions: Insights from analysis of temporal dynamics. Neuroimage. 2014; 93 Pt 1:124–137. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4010223] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.014] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24560717].

Allen EA, Damaraju E, Plis SM, Erhardt EB, Eichele T, Calhoun VD. Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. 2014; 24(3):663–76. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs352. http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/3/663.full.pdf+html.

Majeed W, Magnuson M, Hasenkamp W, Schwarb H, Schumacher EH, Barsalou L, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of low frequency BOLD fluctuations in rats and humans. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(2):1140–50. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2997178] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.030] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20728554].

Smith SM, Miller KL, Moeller S, Xu J, Auerbach EJ, Woolrich MW, et al. Temporally-independent functional modes of spontaneous brain activity. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2012; 109(8):3131–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1121329109. http://www.pnas.org/content/109/8/3131.full.pdf+html.

Handwerker DA, Roopchansingh V, Gonzalez-Castillo J, Bandettini PA. Periodic changes in fMRI connectivity. Neuroimage. 2012; 63(3):1712–9. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4180175] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.078] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22796990].

Castellanos FX, Di Martino A, Craddock RC, Mehta AD, Milham MP. Clinical applications of the functional connectome. Neuroimage. 2013; 80:527–40. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3809093] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.083] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23631991].

Shirer WR, Ryali S, Rykhlevskaia E, Menon V, Greicius MD. Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 22(1):158–65. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3236795] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr099] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21616982].

Krienen FM, Yeo BT, Buckner RL. Reconfigurable task-dependent functional coupling modes cluster around a core functional architecture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1653). [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150301] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0526] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25180304].

Cole MW, Bassett DS, Power JD, Braver TS, Petersen SE. Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the human brain. Neuron. 2014; 83(1):238–51. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4082806] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.014] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24991964].

Zalesky A, Cocchi L, Fornito A, Murray MM, Bullmore E. Connectivity differences in brain networks. NeuroImage. 2012; 60(2):1055–62. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.068.

Ginestet CE, Simmons A. Statistical parametric network analysis of functional connectivity dynamics during a working memory task. Neuroimage. 2011; 55(2):688–704. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.030] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21095229].

Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat. 2001; 29(4):1165–88. doi:10.1214/aos/1013699998.

Shehzad Z, Kelly C, Reiss PT, Cameron Craddock R, Emerson JW, McMahon K, et al. A multivariate distance-based analytic framework for connectome-wide association studies. Neuroimage. 2014; 93 Pt 1:74–94. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4138049] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.024] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24583255].

Craddock RC, Holtzheimer PE, Hu XP, Mayberg HS. Disease state prediction from resting state functional connectivity. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 62(6):1619–28. doi:10.1002/mrm.22159.

Dosenbach NUF, Nardos B, Cohen AL, Fair DA, Power JD, Church JA, et al. Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Sci (New York, N.Y.) 2010; 329(5997):1358–61. doi:10.1126/science.1194144.

Richiardi J, Eryilmaz H, Schwartz S, Vuilleumier P, Van De Ville D. Decoding brain states from fMRI connectivity graphs. NeuroImage. 2011; 56(2):616–26. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.081.

Thoma M, Cheng H, Gretton A, Han J, Kriegel H-P, Smola A, et al. Discriminative frequent subgraph mining with optimality guarantees. Stat Anal Data Min. 2010; 3(5):302–18. doi:10.1002/sam.v3:5.

Bogdanov P, Dereli N, Bassett D. Learning about Learning: Human Brain Sub-Network Biomarkers in fMRI Data. arXiv preprint arXiv: …. 2014. arXiv:1407.5590v1.

Richiardi J, Achard S, Bunke H, Van De Ville D. Machine learning with brain graphs: Predictive modeling approaches for functional imaging in systems neuroscience. Signal Process Mag IEEE. 2013; 30(3):58–70. doi:10.1109/MSP.2012.2233865.

Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage. 2010; 52(3):1059–69. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003.

Bullmore ET, Bassett DS. Brain graphs: graphical models of the human brain connectome. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2011; 7:113–40. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143934.

Vogelstein JT, Roncal WG, Vogelstein RJ, Priebe CE. Graph classification using signal-subgraphs: Applications in statistical connectomics. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2013; 35(7):1539–51. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2012.235.

James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning: with Applications in R. Springer Texts in Statistics: Springer; 2014. http://books.google.com/books?id=at1bmAEACAAJ.

Vapnik VN, Vapnik V. Statistical Learning Theory vol. 2. New York: Wiley; 1998.

Ryali S, Supekar K, Abrams DA, Menon V. Sparse logistic regression for whole-brain classification of fMRI data. Neuroimage. 2010; 51(2):752–64. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2856747] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.040] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20188193].

Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Uses and abuses of screening tests. Lancet. 2002; 359(9309):881–4. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07948-5] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11897304].

Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. BMJ. 1994; 309(6947):102. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2540558] [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8038641PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8038641].

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). Accessed 12 13 2014. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/.

Lugosi G. Learning with an unreliable teacher. Pattern Recognit. 1992; 25(1):79–87. doi:10.1016/0031-3203(92)90008-7.

Scott C, Blanchard G, Handy G, Pozzi S, Flaska M. ArXiv e-prints. 2013. 1303.1208.

Insel T, Cuthbert B, Garvey M, Heinssen R, Pine DS, Quinn K, et al. Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. Am J Psychiat. 2010; 167(7):748–51. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20595427].

Gates KM, Molenaar PC, Iyer SP, Nigg JT, Fair DA. Organizing heterogeneous samples using community detection of GIMME-derived resting state functional networks. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9(3):91322. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958357] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091322] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24642753].

Mørup M. Applications of tensor (multiway array) factorizations and decompositions in data mining. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Data Min Knowl Discov. 2011; 1(1):24–40. doi:10.1002/widm.1.

Franco AR, Ling J, Caprihan A, Calhoun VD, Jung RE, Heileman GL, et al. Multimodal and multi-tissue measures of connectivity revealed by joint independent component analysis. Selected Topics Signal Process IEEE J. 2008; 2(6):986–97.

Groves AR, Beckmann CF, Smith SM, Woolrich MW. Linked independent component analysis for multimodal data fusion. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(3):2198–217. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.073] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20932919].

Calhoun VD, Liu J, Adalı T. A review of group ica for fmri data and ica for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and erp data. Neuroimage. 2009; 45(1):163–72.

Bottger J, Schurade R, Jakobsen E, Schaefer A, Margulies DS. Connexel visualization: a software implementation of glyphs and edge-bundling for dense connectivity data using brainGL. Front Neurosci. 2014; 8:15. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3941704] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00015] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624052].

Birn RM. The role of physiological noise in resting-state functional connectivity. NeuroImage. 2012; 62(2):864–70. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.016.

Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity {MRI} networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage. 2012; 59(3):2142–54. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018.

Dijk KRAV, Sabuncu MR, Buckner RL. The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity {MRI}. NeuroImage. 2012; 59(1):431–8. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044. Neuroergonomics: The human brain in action and at work.

Yan C-G, Cheung B, Kelly C, Colcombe S, Craddock RC, Di Martino A, et al. A comprehensive assessment of regional variation in the impact of head micromovements on functional connectomics. Neuroimage. 2013; 76:183–201.

Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Loughead J, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Hakonarson H. Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: Relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. NeuroImage. 2012; 60(1):623–632. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.063.

Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, Jones TB, Bandettini PA. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: Are anti-correlated networks introduced?NeuroImage. 2009; 44(3):893–905. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036.

Saad ZS, Gotts SJ, Murphy K, Chen G, Jo HJ, Martin A, et al. Trouble at rest: how correlation patterns and group differences become distorted after global signal regression. Brain Connect. 2012; 2(1):25–32. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484684] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0080] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22432927].

Strother SC. Evaluating fmri preprocessing pipelines. Eng Med Biol Mag IEEE. 2006; 25(2):27–41.

Satterthwaite TD, Elliott MA, Gerraty RT, Ruparel K, Loughead J, Calkins ME, Eickhoff SB, Hakonarson H, Gur RC, Gur RE, Wolf DH. An improved framework for confound regression and filtering for control of motion artifact in the preprocessing of resting-state functional connectivity data. NeuroImage. 2013; 64(0):240–256. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.052.

LaConte S, Anderson J, Muley S, Ashe J, Frutiger S, Rehm K, et al. The evaluation of preprocessing choices in single-subject bold fmri using npairs performance metrics. NeuroImage. 2003; 18(1):10–27.

Strother SC, Anderson J, Hansen LK, Kjems U, Kustra R, Sidtis J, et al. The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the npairs data analysis framework. NeuroImage. 2002; 15(4):747–71.

Dinov I, Lozev K, Petrosyan P, Liu Z, Eggert P, Pierce J. Neuroimaging study designs, computational analyses and data provenance using the loni pipeline. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5(9):13070. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0013070.

Yan C-G, Zang Y-F. DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for "Pipeline" Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010; 4:13.

Bellec P, Lavoie-Courchesne S, Dickinson P, Lerch JP, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC. The pipeline system for Octave and Matlab (PSOM): a lightweight scripting framework and execution engine for scientific workflows. Front Neuroinform. 2012; 6:7.

Lavoie-Courchesne S, Rioux P, Chouinard-Decorte F, Sherif T, Rousseau M-E, Das S, et al.Integration of a neuroimaging processing pipeline into a pan-canadian computing grid. J Phys Conf Ser.2012;341(1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/341/1/012032.

Gorgolewski K, Burns CD, Madison C, Clark D, Halchenko YO, Waskom ML, et al. Nipype: a flexible, lightweight and extensible neuroimaging data processing framework in python. Front Neuroinform. 2011; 5:13.

Craddock C, Sikka S, Cheung B, Khanuja R, Ghosh SS, Yan C, et al. Towards automated analysis of connectomes: The configurable pipeline for the analysis of connectomes (c-pac). Front Neuroinform.2013;(42). doi:10.3389/conf.fninf.2013.09.00042.

Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res Int J. 1996; 29(3):162–73.

Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal. 2008; 12(1):26–41.

Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage. 2004; 23 Suppl 1:208–19. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051.

Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline J-P, Frith CD, Frackowiak RSJ. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994; 2(4):189–210. doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402.

Cox RW, Ashburner J, Breman H, Fissell K, Haselgrove C, Holmes CJ, et al. A (sort of) new image data format standard: NifTI-1. In: Proceedings Organization of Human Brain Mapping 10th Annual Meeting, Budapest, Hungary. Budapest, Hungary: 2004.

Amdahl GM. Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities. In: Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, Spring Joint Computer Conference. AFIPS ’67 (Spring). New York, NY, USA: ACM: 1967. p. 483–485. doi:10.1145/1465482.1465560. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1465482.1465560.

O’Driscoll A, Daugelaite J, Sleator RD. ‘big data’, hadoop and cloud computing in genomics. J Biomed Inform. 2013; 46(5):774–81. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2013.07.001.

CPAC. Configurable Pipeline for the Analysis of Connectomes Amazon Machine Instance. Accessed 12 13 2014. 2014. https://github.com/FCP-INDI/ndar-dev/blob/master/aws_walkthrough.md.

NITRC. NITRC Computational Environment. Accessed 01 14 2015. 2014. https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/B00AW0MBLO/ref=mkt_ste_l2_hls_f1?nc2=h_l3_hl.

Eklund A, Andersson M, Knutsson H. fMRI analysis on the GPU-possibilities and challenges. Comput Methods Prog Biomed. 2012; 105(2):145–61. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.07.007.

Hernandez D. Now You Can Build Google’s $1M Artificial Brain on the Cheap. Wired. 2013; 6(3):413–421.

Eklund A, Dufort P, Villani M, LaConte S. Broccoli: Software for fast fmri analysis on many-core cpus and gpus. Front Neuroinform. 2014; 8:24.

Delgado J, Moure JC, Vives-Gilabert Y, Delfino M, Espinosa A, Gomez-Anson B. Improving the execution performance of FreeSurfer : a new scheduled pipeline scheme for optimizing the use of CPU and GPU resources. Neuroinformatics. 2014; 12(3):413–21.

Hernandez M, Guerrero GD, Cecilia JM, Garcia JM, Inuggi A, Jbabdi S, et al. Accelerating fibre orientation estimation from diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging using GPUs. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(4):61892.

Eklund A, Dufort P, Forsberg D, Laconte SM. Medical image processing on the GPU - Past, present and future. Med Image Anal. 2013; 17(8):1073–94. doi:10.1016/j.media.2013.05.008.

Eklund A, Friman O, Andersson M, Knutsson H. A gpu accelerated interactive interface for exploratory functional connectivity analysis of fmri data. In: Image Processing (ICIP), 2011 18th IEEE International Conference On: 2011. p. 1589–1592. doi:10.1109/ICIP.2011.6115753.

Eklund A, Andersson M, Knutsson H. Fast random permutation tests enable objective evaluation of methods for single-subject FMRI analysis. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2011; 2011:627947. doi:10.1155/2011/627947.

Eklund A, Andersson M, Josephson C, Johannesson M, Knutsson H. Does parametric fMRI analysis with SPM yield valid results? An empirical study of 1484 rest datasets. NeuroImage. 2012; 61(3):565–78. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.093.

Munshi A, Gaster B, Mattson TG, Fung J, Ginsburg D. OpenCL Programming Guide, 1st edn. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Professional; 2011.

Craddock RC, Bellec P. Preprocessed Connectomes Project (PCP). Accessed 12 13 2014. 2014. http://preprocessed-connectomes-project.github.io.

Glasser MF, Sotiropoulos SN, Wilson JA, Coalson TS, Fischl B, Andersson JL, et al. The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project. Neuroimage. 2013; 80:105–24. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3720813] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.127] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23668970].

Fox PT, Lancaster JL. Opinion: Mapping context and content: the BrainMap model. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(4):319–21. [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn789] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11967563].

Yarkoni T, Poldrack RA, Nichols TE, Van Essen DC, Wager TD. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat Methods. 2011; 8(8):665–70. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3146590] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1635] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21706013].

Gorgolewski C, Yarkoni T, Schwarz Y, Maumet C, Margulies D. Neurovault. Accessed 12 13 2014. 2014. http://www.neurovault.org.

Toro R. Brainspell. Accessed 12 13 2014. 2014. http://brainspell.org.

of Health Blueprint for Neuroscience Research, N.I. Neuroimaging Informatics Tools and Resources Clearinghouse (NITRC). Accessed 12 13 2014. 2006. http://www.nitrc.org.

Milham MP, Fair D, Mennes M, Mostofsky SH. The adhd-200 consortium: a model to advance the translational potential of neuroimaging in clinical neuroscience. Front Syst Neurosci.2012;6(62). doi:10.3389/fnsys.2012.00062.

Di Martino A, Yan CG, Li Q, Denio E, Castellanos FX, Alaerts K, et al. The autism brain imaging data exchange: towards a large-scale evaluation of the intrinsic brain architecture in autism. Mol Psychiat. 2014; 19(6):659–67. [PubMed Central:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4162310] [DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.78] [PubMed:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23774715].

Zuo X-N, Anderson JS, Bellec P, Birn RM, Biswal BB, Blautzik J, et al. An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics. Sci Data.2014;1.

Poldrack R. OpenfMRI. Accessed 12 13 2014. 2014. https://openfmri.org/.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Tập 4

1-12

Thông tin tác giả