Comparison of theoretical formulae and bootstrap method for statistical error estimation of Feynman-α method

Annals of Nuclear Energy - Tập 124 - Trang 606-615 - 2019
Tomohiro Endo1, Akio Yamamoto1
1Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bard, 1974

Chadwick, 2011, ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data, Nucl. Data Sheets, 112, 2887, 10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002

Dodge, 1999, The complications of the fourth central moment, Am. Stat., 53, 267

Dubi, 2016, Analytic derivation of the statistical error in the Feynman-α method, Ann. Nucl. Energy., 88, 186, 10.1016/j.anucene.2015.11.003

Dubi, 2017, Experimental validation of analytic formulas for the statistical uncertainty in the Feynman-α method, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 106, 84, 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.031

Efron, 1979, Bootstrap methods: another look at the Jackknife, Ann. Stat., 7, 1, 10.1214/aos/1176344552

Endo, 2006, Derivation of theoretical formula for the third order neutron correlation technique by using importance function, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 33, 857, 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.05.005

Endo, 2006, Space and energy dependent theoretical formula for the third order neutron correlation technique, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 33, 521, 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.002

Endo, 2008, Development of deterministic code based on the discrete ordinates method for the third-order neutron correlation technique, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 35, 927, 10.1016/j.anucene.2007.09.014

Endo, 2016, Statistical error estimation of the Feynman-α method using the bootstrap method, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol., 53, 1447, 10.1080/00223131.2015.1113898

Feynman, 1956, Dispersion of the neutron emission in U-235 Fission, J. Nucl. Energy., 3, 64

Gwin, 1984, Measurements of the energy dependence of prompt neutron emission from 233U, 235U, 239Pu, and 241Pu for En = 0.005 to 10 eV relative to emission from spontaneous fission of 252Cf, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 87, 381, 10.13182/NSE84-A18506

Hashimoto, 1996, Experimental investigations of dead-time effect on Feynman-α method, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 23, 1099, 10.1016/0306-4549(95)00121-2

IRID Annual Research Report 2017, International Research Institute for Nuclear Decommissioning. pp. 26–27. Available from: http://irid.or.jp/_pdf/pamphleth29_eng.pdf#page=15; 2018.

Misawa, 1990, Measurement of prompt neutron decay constant and large subcriticality by the Feynman-α method, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 104, 53, 10.13182/NSE104-53

Pázsit, 2008

Pázsit, 2005, Calculation of the pulsed Feynman-alpha formulae and their experimental verification, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 32, 986, 10.1016/j.anucene.2004.12.007

Pázsit, 1998, The variance-to-mean ratio in subcritical systems driven by a spallation source, Ann. Nucl. Energy., 25, 667, 10.1016/S0306-4549(97)00117-5

Pyeon, 2017, Benchmarks of subcriticality in accelerator-driven system at Kyoto University Critical Assembly, Nucl. Eng. Technol., 49, 1234, 10.1016/j.net.2017.06.012

Pyeon, 2017, Experimental benchmarks on kinetic parameters in accelerator-driven system with 100 MeV protons at Kyoto University Critical Assembly, Ann. Nucl. Energy., 105, 346, 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.030

Rose, 2002, 253

2017. SciPy Reference Guide Release 1.0.0. 1031–1034. Available from: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy-1.0.0/scipy-ref-1.0.0.pdf#page=1035.

Shiozawa, 2015, Investigation on subcriticality measurement using inherent neutron source in nuclear fuel

Szeless, 1969, Reactor noise parameters by the maximum likelihood method, Trans. Am. Nucl. Soc., 12, 739

Szeless, 1971, The exact probability distribution of reactor neutron noise, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 45, 7, 10.13182/NSE71-A20340

2017

Williams, 1974

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Annals of Nuclear Energy

Tập 124

606-615

Thông tin tác giả