Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners

Ruben Pauwels1, Jilke Beinsberger1, Harry Stamatakis2, Kostas Tsiklakis2, Adrian Walker3, Hilde Bosmans4, Ria Bogaerts5, Reinhilde Jacobs1, Keith Horner6
1Oral Imaging Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2Department of Oral Diagnosis and Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
3Leeds Test Objects, Boroughbridge, United Kingdom
4Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
5Department of Experimental Radiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
6School of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alqerban, 2011, Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption, Eur J Orthod, 33, 93, 10.1093/ejo/cjq034

Hashimoto, 2007, Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 36, 465, 10.1259/dmfr/22818643

Liang, 2010, A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT) part I, Eur J Radiol, 75, 265, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.042

Suomalainen, 2009, Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38, 367, 10.1259/dmfr/15779208

Loubele, 2008, Image quality vs. radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 37, 309, 10.1259/dmfr/16770531

Loubele, 2008, Comparative study of image quality for MSCT and CBCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial radiology applications, Radiat Protect Dosim, 129, 222, 10.1093/rpd/ncn154

Soğur, 2007, Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography, Int Endod J, 40, 179, 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01204.x

Hashimoto, 2003, A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 95, 371, 10.1067/moe.2003.120

Mischkowski, 2008, Diagnostic quality of multiplanar reformations obtained with a newly developed cone beam device for maxillofacial imaging, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 37, 1, 10.1259/dmfr/25381129

Ritter, 2009, The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 108, e108, 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.011

Pauwels, 2011, development and applicability of a quality control phantom for dental cone-beam CT, J Appl Clin Med Phys, 12, 245, 10.1120/jacmp.v12i4.3478

Landis, 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics, 33, 159, 10.2307/2529310

Horner, 2009, Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38, 187, 10.1259/dmfr/74941012