Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners

Scarfe, 2006, Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice, J Can Dent Assoc, 72, 75 Martin, 1999, Balancing patient dose and image quality, Appl Radiat Isot, 50, 1, 10.1016/S0969-8043(98)00021-9 Farman, 2005, ALARA still applies, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 100, 395, 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.05.055 International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann ICRP 37. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press, 2007. Martin, 2007, Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures?, Br J Radiol, 80, 639, 10.1259/bjr/25922439 Brenner, 2008, Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced, Br J Radiol, 81, 521, 10.1259/bjr/22942198 Thilander-Klang, 2010, Methods of determining the effective dose in dental radiology, Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 139, 306, 10.1093/rpd/ncq081 Huda, 1984, Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements, Health Phys, 47, 463 Loubele, 2009, Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications, Eur J Radiol, 71, 461, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.06.002 Okano, 2009, Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38, 79, 10.1259/dmfr/14769929 Suomalainen, 2009, Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38, 367, 10.1259/dmfr/15779208 Ludlow, 2008, Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106, 106, 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.018 Silva, 2008, Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 133, 640.e1-5, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.11.019 Ludlow, 2006, Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray NewTom 3G and i-CAT, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 35, 219, 10.1259/dmfr/14340323 Tsiklakis K, Donta C, Gavala S, Karayianni K, Kamenopoulou V, Hourdakis CJ. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT. Eur J Radiol 2005;56(3):413–7. Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009;82(973):35–40. Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MA. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37(5):268–73. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96(4):508–13. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, et al. Radiation dose vs. image quality for low-dose CT protocols of the head for maxillofacial surgery and oral implant planning. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2006;117(1–3):211–6. Ngan, 2003, Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs, Aust Orthod J, 19, 67 Ludlow, 2008, Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation, J Am Dent Assoc, 139, 1237, 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0339 Gijbels F, Jacobs R, Bogaerts R, Debaveye D, Verlinden S, Sanderink G. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging Part I: patient exposure. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34(3):145–9.