Comparison of Two Automated Multi‐Channel Blood Cell Counting Systems for Analysis of Blood of Common Domestic Animals

An automated, multi‐channel blood cell counting system (S‐Plus) was compared to a reference counting system using blood samples from 187 animals of four species. The standard red cell bath aperture current of 150 volts (V) was used during analysis of 75% of the samples. At this setting, all samples with a Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) greater than 50 fl had accurate erythrocyte counts. As the MCV decreased below 50 fl, the severity of false low erythrocyte counts and false high MCV values increased. The remaining 25% of samples were analyzed with the red cell bath aperture current increased to 200 V. At this setting, only 5% or less of erythrocytes from animals with normal MCV values (>36 fl) were below the erythrocyte threshold. The red cell distribution width values provided by the S‐Plus indicated that equine and bovine erythrocytes have greater anisocytosis than canine and feline erythrocytes. Leukocyte counts were significantly lower on the S‐Plus (p < 0.01). Canine and equine samples most frequently had platelet size distribution within the S‐Plus platelet counting threshold window. Electronic whole blood platelet counting appeared unsatisfactory in cats due to large platelet size and erythrocyte‐platelet size overlap. Small platelet size in cattle indicated that further modifications of the red cell bath aperture current would be required to count and size platelets in this species. Following electronic modifications, this state‐of‐the‐art system appears adaptable to hematologic profiling in most species.