Co-pyrolysis–catalytic steam reforming of cellulose/lignin with polyethylene/polystyrene for the production of hydrogen

Waste Disposal & Sustainable Energy - Tập 2 - Trang 177-191 - 2020
Kaltume Akubo1, Mohamad Anas Nahil1, Paul T. Williams1
1School of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Tóm tắt

Co-pyrolysis of biomass biopolymers (lignin and cellulose) with plastic wastes (polyethylene and polystyrene) coupled with downstream catalytic steam reforming of the pyrolysis gases for the production of a hydrogen-rich syngas is reported. The catalyst used was 10 wt.% nickel supported on MCM-41. The influence of the process parameters of temperature and the steam flow rate was examined to optimize hydrogen and syngas production. The cellulose/plastic mixtures produced higher hydrogen yields compared with the lignin/plastic mixtures. However, the impact of raising the catalytic steam reforming temperature from 750 to 850 °C was more marked for lignin addition. For example, the hydrogen yield for cellulose/polyethylene at a catalyst temperature of 750 °C was 50.3 mmol g−1 and increased to 60.0 mmol g−1 at a catalyst temperature of 850 °C. However, for the lignin/polyethylene mixture, the hydrogen yield increased from 25.0 to 50.0 mmol g−1 representing a twofold increase in hydrogen yield. The greater influence on hydrogen and yield for the lignin/plastic mixtures compared to the cellulose/plastic mixtures is suggested to be due to the overlapping thermal degradation profiles of lignin and the polyethylene and polystyrene. The input of steam to the catalyst reactor produced catalytic steam reforming conditions and a marked increase in hydrogen yield. The influence of increased steam input to the process was greater for the lignin/plastic mixtures compared to the cellulose/plastic mixtures, again linked to the overlapping thermal degradation profiles of the lignin and the plastics. A comparison of the Ni/MCM-41 catalyst with Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/Y-zeolite-supported catalysts showed that the Ni/Al2O3 catalyst gave higher yields of hydrogen and syngas.

Tài liệu tham khảo

IEA. The Future of hydrogen: seizing todays opportunities. In: Report prepared by the IEA for the G20, Japan. International Energy Agency, Paris, 2019. Dincer I, Acar C. Review and evaluation of hydrogen production methods for better sustainability. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2015;40:11094–111. Balat H, Kırtay E. Hydrogen from biomass–present scenario and future prospects. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35(14):7416–26. Kirkels AF, Verbong GP. Biomass gasification: Still promising? A 30-year global overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2011;15(1):471–81. Akubo K, Nahil MA, Williams PT. Pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of agricultural biomass wastes and biomass components for production of hydrogen/syngas. J Energy Inst. 2019;92(6):1987–96. Blanco PH, Wu C, Williams PT. Influence of Ni/SiO2 catalyst preparation methods on hydrogen production from the pyrolysis/reforming of refuse derived fuel. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39:5723–32. Lopez G, Artetxe M, Amutio M, et al. Recent advances in the gasification of waste plastics. A critical overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;82:576–96. Barbarias I, Lopez G, Alvarez J, et al. Valorisation of different waste plastics by pyrolysis and in-line catalytic steam reforming for hydrogen production. Energy Convers Manag. 2018;156:575–84. Williams PT. Hydrogen & carbon nanotubes from pyrolysis-catalysis of waste plastics: a review. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01054-w. Chai Y, Gao N, Wang M, et al. H2 production from co-pyrolysis/gasification of waste plastics and biomass under novel catalyst Ni-CaO-C. Chem Eng J. 2020;382:122947. Liu WW, Hu CW, Yang Y, et al. Study on the effect of metal types in (Me)-Al-MCM-41 on the mesoporous structure and catalytic behavior during the vapor-catalyzed co-pyrolysis of pubescens and LDPE. Appl Catal B. 2013;129:202–13. Alvarez J, Kumagai S, Wu C, et al. Hydrogen production from biomass and plastic mixtures by pyrolysis-gasification. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014;39(21):10883–91. Lopez G, Erkiaga A, Amutio M, et al. Effect of polyethylene co-feeding in the steam gasification of biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor. Fuel. 2015;153:393–401. Ahmed I, Nipattummakul N, Gupta A. Characteristics of syngas from co-gasification of polyethylene and woodchips. Appl Energy. 2011;88(1):165–74. Pinto F, Franco C, André R, et al. Co-gasification study of biomass mixed with plastic wastes. Fuel. 2002;81(3):291–7. Arregi A, Amutio M, Lopez G, et al. Hydrogen-rich gas production by continuous pyrolysis and in-line catalytic reforming of pine wood waste and HDPE mixtures. Energy Conserv Manag. 2017;136:192–201. Block C, Ephraim A, Weiss-Hortala E, et al. C0-pyrogasification of plastics and biomass. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2019;10(3):483–509. Dong L, Wu C, Ling H, et al. Promoting hydrogen production and minimizing catalyst deactivation from the pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming of biomass on nanosized NiZnAlOx catalysts. Fuel. 2017;188:610–20. Czernik S, French RJ. Production of hydrogen from plastics by pyrolysis and catalytic steam reform. Energy Fuels. 2006;20:754–8. Namioka T, Saito A, Inoue Y, et al. Hydrogen-rich gas production from waste plastics by pyrolysis and low-temperature steam reforming over a ruthenium catalyst. Appl Energy. 2011;88:2019–26. Yao D, Yang H, Chen H, et al. Investigation of nickel impregnated zeolite catalysts for hydrogen/syngas production from the catalytic reforming of waste polyethylene. Appl Catal B Environ. 2018;227:477–87. Wu C, Williams PT. Nickel-based catalysts for tar reduction in biomass gasification. Biofuels. 2011;2:451–64. Wu C, Williams PT. Investigation of Ni-Al, Ni-Mg-Al and Ni-Cu-Al catalysts for hydrogen production from pyrolysis-gasification of polypropylene. Appl Catal B. 2009;90:147–56. Ochoa A, Bilbao J, Gayubo AG, et al. Coke formation and deactivation during catalytic reforming of biomass and waste pyrolysis products; a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2020;119:109600. Wu C, Williams PT. Investigation of coke formation on Ni-Mg-Al catalyst for hydrogen production from the catalytic steam pyrolysis-gasification of polypropylene. Appl Catal B Environ. 2010;96:198–207. Claridge JB, York APE, Brungs AJ, et al. New catalysts for the conversion of methane to synthesis gas: molybdenum and tungsten carbide. J Catal. 1998;180:85–100. Ma Y, Guan G, Hao X, et al. Molybdenum carbide as alternative catalyst for hydrogen production—a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;75:1101–29. Liu S, Chen M, Chu L, et al. Catalytic steam reforming of bio-oil aqueous fraction for hydrogen production over Ni-Mo supported on modified sepiolite catalysts. Int J Energy Res. 2013;38:3948–55. Figen HE, Baykara SZ. Effect of ruthenium addition on molybdenum catalysts for syngas production via catalytic partial oxidation of methane in a monolithic reactor. Int J Energy Res. 2018;43:1129–38. Zhang Y, Huang J, Williams PT. Fe-Ni-MCM-41 catalysts for hydrogen-rich syngas production from waste plastics by pyrolysis-catalytic steam reforming. Energy Fuels. 2017;32(8):8497–504. Wu C, Wang LZ, Williams PT, et al. Hydrogen production from biomass gasification with Ni/MCM-41 catalysts: influence of Ni content. Appl Catal B. 2011;108:6–13. Zhang X, Lei H, Chen S, et al. Catalytic co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with polymers: a critical review. Green Chem. 2016;18(15):4145–69. Giudicianni P, Cardone G, Ragucci R. Cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin slow steam pyrolysis: thermal decomposition of biomass components mixtures. J Anal Appl Pyrol. 2013;100:213–22. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, et al. In-depth investigation of biomass pyrolysis based on three major components: hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin. Energy Fuels. 2006;20(1):388–93. Jin W, Shen D, Liu Q, et al. Evaluation of the co-pyrolysis of lignin with plastic polymers by TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS. Polym Degrad Stab. 2016;133:65–74. Oyedun AO, Gebreegzaibher T, Ng DKS, et al. Mixed waste pyrolysis of biomass and plastics waste—a modelling approach to reduce energy usage. Energy. 2014;75:127–35. Sharypov VI, Beregovtsova NG, Baryshnikov SV, et al. Co-pyrolysis of wood biomass and synthetic polymer mixtures. Part 1: Influence of experimental conditions on the evolution of solids, liquids and gases. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2002;64:15–28. Burra KG, Gupta AK. Synergistic effects in steam gasification of combined biomass and plastic waste mixtures. Appl Energy. 2018;211:230–6. Wu C, Dong L, Onwudili J, et al. Effect of Ni particle location within the mesoporous MCM-41 support for hydrogen production from the catalytic gasification of biomass. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2013;1:1083–91. Zhao M, Florin NH, Harris AT. The influence of supported Ni catalysts on the product gas distribution and H2 yield during cellulose pyrolysis. Appl Catal B-Environ. 2009;92(1–2):185–93. Lucredio AF, Assaf EM. Cobalt catalysts prepared from hydrotalcite precursors and tested in methane steam reforming. J Power Sour. 2006;159(1):667–72. Xu D, Xiong Y, Ye J, et al. Performances of syngas production and deposited coke regulation during co-gasification of biomass and plastic wastes over Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalyst: role of biomass to plastic ratio in feedstock. Chem Eng J. 2020;392:123728. Wu C, Williams PT. Hydrogen production from the pyrolysis-gasification of polypropylene: influence of steam flow rate, carrier gas flow rate and gasification temperature. Energy Fuels. 2009;23:5055–61. Ruoppolo G, Ammendola P, Chirone R, et al. H2-rich syngas production by fluidized bed gasification of biomass and plastic fuel. Waste Manag. 2012;32(4):724–32. Li J, Yin Y, Zhang X, et al. Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam gasification of palm oil wastes over supported tri-metallic catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34(22):9108–15. Wu C, Williams PT. Hydrogen production by steam gasification of polypropylene with various nickel catalysts. Appl Catal B. 2009;87:152–61. Yao W, Li J, Feng Y, Wang W, et al. Thermally stable phosphorus and nickel modified ZSM-5 zeolites for catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastics. RSC Adv. 2015;5(39):30485–94.