Can they go it alone? Addressing criticisms of coteaching

Cultural Studies of Science Education - Tập 4 - Trang 461-475 - 2008
Colette Murphy1, Karen Carlisle1, Jim Beggs2
1School of Education, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
2St Mary’s University College, Belfast, UK

Tóm tắt

This paper responds to Wassell and LaVan’s paper on the transition from a preservice coteaching experience to independent teaching as a beginning inservice teacher. Wassell and LaVan describe coteaching as an alternative to traditional teaching. In our response, we argue that coteaching can also be applied alongside independent teaching in preservice courses, as opposed to an alternative to independent teaching, which has been shown to alleviate some of the transition issues described by Wassell and LaVan. We then present a critical discussion of different models and vocabularies of coteaching which apply in different sociocultural settings to expand the concept of coteaching. We attempt to extend Wassell and LaVan’s use of Guba and Lincoln’s (Fourth generation evaluation, 1989) authenticity criteria from the research methodology towards considering the criteria also as a framework for coteaching as practice for preservice and cooperating teachers. Finally, we reflect on the role of critical ethnography in Wassell and LaVan’s study in terms of the researchers’ intervention and whether improvements in the transition can be effectively introduced which do not require such intervention. We conclude our discussion with some suggestions to take forward this important work.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Carlisle, K. (2008). An examination of coteaching within initial teacher education. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Queen’s University, Belfast.

Eick, C., & Ware, F. (2005). Coteaching in a science methods course: An apprenticeship model for early induction to the secondary classroom. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp. 187–206). New York: Peter Lang.

Eick, C., Ware, F., & Williams, P. (2003). Coteaching in a science methods course: A situated learning model of becoming a teacher. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(1), 74–85. doi:10.1177/0022487102238659.

General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland. (2007). Teaching: The reflective profession. Belfast: GTCNI. Retrieved May 30, 2008, from http://www.gtcni.org.uk/uploads/docs/GTCNI_Comp_Bmrk%20%20Aug%2007.pdf.

Hartford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.010

Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2005). Coteaching as an approach to enhance science learning and teaching in primary schools. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp. 207–231). New York: Peter Lang.

Murphy, C., & Carlisle, K. (2008). Situating relational ontology and transformative activist stance within the ‘everyday’ practice of coteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11422-008-9124-y.

Murphy, C., Beggs, J., Carlisle, K., & Greenwood, J. (2004). Students as ‘catalysts’ in the classroom: The impact of co-teaching between science student teachers and primary classroom teachers on children’s enjoyment and learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(8), 1023–1036. doi:10.1080/1468181032000158381.

Roth, W.-M. (1998). Science teaching as knowledgeability: A case study of knowing and learning during coteaching. Science Education, 82, 357–377. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199806)82:3<357::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-B.

Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2001). Learning to teach science as praxis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 741–762. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00027-0.

Roth, W.-M., Lawless, D., & Tobin, K. (2000). Time to teach: Towards a praxeology of teaching. Canadian Journal of Education, 25, 1–15. doi:10.2307/1585864.

Tobin, K. (2005). Using science education to expand the agency of urban youth. Online powerpoint presentation, available at: www.education.umd.edu/mimaue/Symposia/2005/Tobin.ppt. Accessed 30 May 2007.