COVID-19 và Thái độ của Người Mỹ đối với Các Tranh chấp giữa Mỹ và Trung Quốc

Journal of Chinese Political Science - Tập 26 - Trang 139-168 - 2021
Hsuan-Yu Lin1
1Department of Politics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA

Tóm tắt

Sự bùng phát của COVID-19 đã làm gia tăng căng thẳng giữa Mỹ và Trung Quốc. Tài liệu hiện có trong lĩnh vực quan hệ quốc tế hiếm khi tập trung vào các sự kiện bùng phát virus như những yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến quan hệ quốc tế giữa các cường quốc, và cũng không có nghiên cứu nào xem xét ảnh hưởng tiềm năng của một sự bùng phát đến quan điểm của công chúng về chính sách đối ngoại của quốc gia họ. Để lấp đầy khoảng trống nghiên cứu này, nghiên cứu này khám phá mức độ mà công chúng Mỹ có thể thiên về các chính sách

Từ khóa

#COVID-19 #Mỹ #Trung Quốc #chính sách đối ngoại #tranh chấp quốc tế #khảo sát trực tuyến

Tài liệu tham khảo

Almond, G.A. 1950. The American people and foreign policy. Harcourt, Brace.

Althaus, S.L. 2003. When news norms collide, follow the lead: New evidence for press independence. Political Communication 20 (4): 381–414.

Baum, M.A., and P.B. Potter. 2015. War and democratic constraint: How the public influences foreign policy. Princeton University Press.

Baum, M.A., and P.B. Potter. 2019. Media, public opinion, and foreign policy in the age of social media. The Journal of Politics 81 (2): 747–756.

Berinsky, A.J. 2007. Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. The Journal of Politics 69 (4): 975–997.

Berinsky, A.J. 2009. In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq. University of Chicago Press.

Berinsky, A.J., G.A. Huber, and G.S. Lenz. 2012. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–368.

Brody, R. 1991. Assessing the president: The media, elite opinion, and public support. Stanford University Press.

Clunan, A., P.R. Lavoy, and S.B. Martin. 2008. Terrorism, war, or disease?: Unraveling the use of biological weapons. Stanford University Press.

De Mesquita, B.B., and D. Lalman. 1990. Domestic opposition and foreign war. American Political Science Review 84 (3): 747–765.

Doyle, M.W. 1986. Liberalism and world politics. The American Political Science Review 80: 1151–1169.

Fearon, J.D. 1994. Domestic political audiences and the escalation of international disputes. American Political Science Review 88 (3): 577–592.

Fearon, J.D. 1995. Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization 49 (3): 379–414.

Gartner, S.S. 2008. The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: An experimental approach. The American Political Science Review 102 (1): 95–106.

Ghobarah, H.A., P. Huth, and B. Russett. 2004. The post-war public health effects of civil conflict. Social Science & Medicine 59 (4): 869–884.

Grossman, D. 2020. Military Build-Up in the South China Sea. In The South China Sea: From a Regional Maritime Dispute to Geo-Strategic Competition, ed. L. Buszynski and D.T. Hai. NY: Routledge.

Holsti, O.R. 2004. Public opinion and American foreign policy. University of Michigan Press.

Horowitz, M.C., and M.S. Levendusky. 2011. Drafting support for war: Conscription and mass support for warfare. The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 524–534.

Jentleson, B.W. 1992. The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 49–74.

Jentleson, B.W., and R.L. Britton. 1998. Still pretty prudent: Post-cold war American public opinion on the use of military force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (4): 395–417.

Letendre, K., C.L. Fincher, and R. Thornhill. 2010. Does infectious disease cause global variation in the frequency of intrastate armed conflict and civil war? Biological Reviews 85 (3): 669–683.

Liberman, P. 2006. An eye for an eye: Public support for war against evildoers. International Organization 60 (3): 687–722.

Lippmann, W. 1946. Public opinion. Vol. 1. Transaction Publishers.

Maoz, I., and C. McCauley. 2008. Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 52 (1): 93–116.

Mattes, M., and J.L.P. Weeks. 2019. Hawks, doves, and peace: An experimental approach. American Journal of Political Science 63 (1): 53–66.

Mueller, J.E. 1973. War, presidents, and public opinion. New York: Wiley.

Mummolo, J., and E. Peterson. 2019. Demand effects in survey experiments: An empirical assessment. American Political Science Review 113 (2): 517–529.

Mylonas, H., and K. Kuo. 2017. Nationalism and Foreign Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.452.

Owen, J.M. 1994. How liberalism produces democratic peace. International Security 19 (2): 87–125.

Page, B.I., and R.Y. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Pang, Q., and N. Thomas. 2017. Chinese nationalism and trust in East Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47 (5): 815–838.

Schultz, K.A. 1998. Domestic opposition and signaling in international crises. American Political Science Review 92 (4): 829–844.

Schultz, K.A. 2001. Democracy and coercive diplomacy. Vol. 76. Cambridge University Press.

Smith, J. 2014. The Spanish-American War 1895–1902: Conflict in the Caribbean and the Pacific. Routledge.

Snyder, J.L. 2000. From voting to violence: Democratization and nationalist conflict. New York: Norton.

Tomz, M., J.L. Weeks, and K. Yarhi-Milo. 2020. Public opinion and decisions about military force in democracies. International Organization 74 (1): 119–143.

Van Evera, S. 1994. Hypotheses on nationalism and war. International Security 18 (4): 5–39.

Zaller, J.R. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Chinese Political Science

Tập 26

139-168

Thông tin tác giả