Blended learning across universities in a South–North–South collaboration: a case study

Health Research Policy and Systems - Tập 14 - Trang 1-12 - 2016
Myroslava Protsiv1, Senia Rosales-Klintz1, Freddie Bwanga2, Merrick Zwarenstein3,4, Salla Atkins1
1Department of Public Health Sciences, Global Health (IHCAR), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
2College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
3Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
4Faculty of Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa

Tóm tắt

Increased health research capacity is needed in low- and middle-income countries to respond to local health challenges. Technology-aided teaching approaches, such as blended learning (BL), can stimulate international education collaborations and connect skilled scientists who can jointly contribute to the efforts to address local shortages of high-level research capacity. The African Regional Capacity Development for Health Systems and Services Research (ARCADE HSSR) was a European Union-funded project implemented from 2011 to 2015. The project consortium partners worked together to expand access to research training and to build the research capacity of post-graduate students. This paper presents a case study of the first course in the project, which focused on a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies and was delivered in 2013 through collaboration by universities in Uganda, Sweden and South Africa. We conducted a mixed-methods case study involving student course evaluations, participant observation, interviews with teaching faculty and student feedback collected through group discussion. Quantitative data were analysed using frequencies, and qualitative data using thematic analysis. A traditional face-to-face course was adapted for BL using a mixture of online resources and materials, synchronous online interaction between students and teachers across different countries complemented by face-to-face meetings, and in-class interaction between students and tutors. Synchronous online discussions led by Makerere University were the central learning technique in the course. The learners appreciated the BL design and reported that they were highly motivated and actively engaged throughout the course. The teams implementing the course were small, with individual faculty members and staff members carrying out many extra responsibilities; yet, some necessary competencies for course design were not available. BL is a feasible approach to simultaneously draw globally available skills into cross-national, high-level skills training in multiple countries. This method can overcome access barriers to research methods courses and can offer engaging formats and personalised learning experiences. BL enables teaching and learning from experts and peers across the globe with minimal disruption to students’ daily schedules. Transforming a face-to-face course into a blended course that fulfils its full potential requires concerted effort and dedicated technological and pedagogical support.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Kilama WL. The 10/90 gap in sub-Saharan Africa: resolving inequities in health research. Acta Trop. 2009;112 Suppl 1:S8–S15.

World Health Organization. World report on knowledge for better health. Strengthening health systems. Geneva: WHO; 2004. http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/en/world_report_on_knowledge_for_better_health2.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2015.

Mirzoev T, Le G, Green A, Orgill M, Komba A, Esena RK, et al. Assessment of capacity for health policy and systems research and analysis in seven African universities: results from the CHEPSAA project. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(7):831–41.

Nangami MN, Rugema L, Tebeje B, Mukose A. Institutional capacity for health systems research in East and Central Africa schools of public health: enhancing capacity to design and implement teaching programs. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:22.

Pariyo G, Serwadda D, Sewankambo NK, Groves S, Bollinger RC, Peters DH. A grander challenge: the case of how Makerere University College of Health Sciences (MakCHS) contributes to health outcomes in Africa. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011;11 Suppl 1:S2.

Guwatudde D, Bwanga F, Dudley L, Chola L, Leyna GH, Mmbaga EJ, et al. Training for health services and systems research in sub-Saharan Africa – a case study at four East and Southern African universities. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:68. doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-68.

Bhagavan MR. The SAREC model: Institutional cooperation and the strengthening of national research capacity in developing countries. Sweden: SAREC Report; 1992.

Sewankambo N, Tumwine J, Tomson G, Obua C, Bwanga F, Waiswa P, et al. Enabling dynamic partnerships through joint degrees between Low- and high-income countries for capacity development in global health research: experience from the Karolinska Institutet/Makerere University Partnership. PLoS Med. 2015;12(2):e1001784.

Minja H, Nsanzabana C, Maure C, Hoffmann A, Rumisha S, Ogundahunsi O, et al. Impact of health research capacity strengthening in low- and middle-income countries: the case of WHO/TDR programmes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5(10):e1351. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001351.

Bollinger RC, McKenzie-White J, Gupta A. Building a global health education network for clinical care and research. The benefits and challenges of distance learning tools. Lessons learned from the Hopkins Center for Clinical Global Health Education. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011;25(2):385–98.

Bocchi J, Eastman JK, Owens SC. Retaining the online learner: profile of students in an online MBA program and implications for teaching them. J Educ Business. 2004;79(4):245–53.

Ally M. Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In: Anderson T, editor. The theory and practice of online learning. 2nd ed. Edmonton: AU Press; 2008. p. 15–44.

Roy R, Potter S, Yarrow K. Designing low carbon higher education systems: environmental impacts of campus and distance learning systems. Int J Sustainability Higher Educ. 2008;9(2):116–30.

Song L, Singleton ES, Hill JR, Koh MH. Improving online learning: student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. Internet High Educ. 2004;7(1):59–70.

Hara N, Kling R. Student distress in web-based distance education. Educ Q. 2001;24(3):68–9.

Tyler-Smith K. Early attrition among first time eLearners: a review of factors that contribute to drop-out, withdrawal and non-completion rates of adult learners undertaking eLearning programmes. J Online Learning Teaching. 2006;2(2):73–85. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol2no2/tyler-smith.htm. Accessed 30 June 2016.

Bonk CJ, Graham CR. The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing; 2006.

Brigley S, Hosein I, Myemba I. Placing learning needs in context: distance learning for clinical officers in Tanzania. Med Teach. 2009;31(4):e169–76. doi:10.1080/01421590802590546.

Potter MA, Fertman CI, Eggleston MM, Holtzhauer F, Pearsol J. A public health training center experience: professional continuing education at schools of public health. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008;14(4):E10–6. doi:10.1097/01.PHH.0000324576.81942.b1.

Demers AL, Mamary E, Ebin VJ. Creating opportunities for training California’s public health workforce. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2011;31(1):64–9. doi:10.1002/chp.20102.

Salinas-Miranda AA, Nash MC, Salemi JL, Mbah AK, Salihu HM. Cutting-edge technology for public health workforce training in comparative effectiveness research. Health Informatics J. 2013;19(2):101–15. doi:10.1177/1460458212461366.

Tancred T, Schleiff M, Peters DH, Balabanova D. Global Mapping of Health Policy and Systems Research Training. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. 2015. http://healthsystemsglobal.org/upload/resource/Global_Mapping_of_Health_Policy_and_Systems_Research_Training.compressed.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2015.

Alammary A, Sheard J, Carbone A. Blended learning in higher education: three different design approaches. Australas J Educ Technol. 2014;30(4):440–54.

Liu Q, Peng W, Zhang F, Hu R, Li Y, Yan W. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(1):e2.

Sung Y, Kwon I, Rya E. Blended learning on medication administration for new nurses: integration of e-learning and face-to-face instruction in the classroom. Nurse Educ Today. 2008;28(8):943–52.

Milic NM, Trajkovic GZ, Bukumiric ZM, Cirkovic A, Nikolic IM, Milin JS, Milic NV, Savic MD, Corac AM, Marinkovic JM, Stanisavljevic DM. Improving education in medical statistics: implementing a blended learning model in the existing curriculum. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148882.

Kiviniemi MT. Effects of a blended learning approach on student outcomes in a graduate-level public health course. BMC Med Education. 2014;14:47.

Carbonaro M, King S, Taylor E, Satzinger F, Snart F, Drummond J. Integration of e-learning technologies in an interprofessional health science course. Med Teach. 2008;30(1):25–33.

So H-J. Is blended learning a viable option in public health education? A case study of student satisfaction with a blended graduate course. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009;15(1):59–66.

Smyth S, Houghton C, Cooney A, Casey D. Students’ experiences of blended learning across a range of postgraduate programmes. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(4):464–8.

Alonso F, López G, Manrique D, Viñes JM. An instructional model for web‐based e‐learning education with a blended learning process approach. Br J Educ Technol. 2005;36(2):217–35.

Lancaster JW, Wong A, Roberts SJ. ‘Tech’ versus ‘Talk’: a comparison study of two different lecture styles within a master of science nurse practitioner course. Nurse Educ Today. 2012;32(5):e14–8.

Moraros J, Islam A, Yu S, Banow R, Schindelka B. Flipping for success: evaluating the effectiveness of a novel teaching approach in a graduate level setting. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:27.

Effken JA. Doctoral education from a distance. Nurs Clin N Am. 2008;43(4):557–66.

Halter MJ, Kleiner C, Hess RF. The experience of nursing students in an online doctoral program in nursing: a phenomenological study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43:99–105.

Ivankova NV, Stick SL. Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: a mixed methods study. Res High Educ. 2006;48(1):93–135.

Leander K. Implementation of blended learning in a doctoral course in epidemiology. J Scholarship Teaching Learning Med Educ. 2010;1:55–65.

Savin Baden M, Wilkie K. Challenging research in problem-based learning. UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 2004.

Zvarova J, Svacina S, Dostalova T, Seydlova M, Zvara K. Multiple disciplines synergy tools for Ph.D. students of biomedical informatics at Charles University in Prague. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;180:1153–5.

Gilson L. Introduction to health policy and systems research. Health policy and systems research: a methodology reader. Geneva: Alliance for Health Policy and System Research, WHO; 2012.

MetaDisc® Meta-analysis of diagnostic and screening tests, version 1.4, Spain http://meta-disc.software.informer.com. Accessed 17 Nov 2015.

ARCADE Open Course Repository. http://courses.arcade-project.org. 2013. Accessed 14 Apr 2016.

Hastie M, Hung IC, Chen NS, Kinshuk. A blended synchronous learning model for educational international collaboration. Innov Educ Teaching Int. 2010;47(1):9–24.

Moodle: Modular Object-Oriented Dynamic Learning Environment, version 2.1. Moodle Pty Ltd., Australia. 2011. http://www.moodle.com. Accessed 17 Nov 2015.

Savery JR, Duffy TM. Problem based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educ Technol. 1995;35(5):31–8.

Kanuka H, Anderson T. Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy. 1999;2:1. http://www.radicalpedagogy.org/radicalpedagogy/Using_Constructivism_in_Technology-Mediated_Learning__Constructing_Order_out_of_the_Chaos_in_the_Literature.html.

Chickering AW, Gamson ZF. Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bull. 1987;3:7.

Bangert AW. The seven principles of effective teaching: a framework for designing, delivering, and evaluating an internet‐based assessment course for nurse educators. Nurse Educ. 2005;30(5):221–5.

Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–12. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.

Graham CR, Woodfield W, Harrison JB. A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2013;18:4–14.

Protsiv M, Atkins S. Lecturers’ experiences of preparing and delivering blended courses on African, Asian and European university campuses: A qualitative study. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:28149. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.28149.

Porter WW, Graham CR, Bodily RG, Sandberg DS. A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2016;28:17–27.

Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, Mikhail N, Ross H, Wohltjen H, Bedada S, Korhumel K, Koumare AK, Scott J. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low-and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:4.

Kistow B. Blended learning in higher education: a study of a graduate school of business, Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Teaching Scholar. 2011;1(2):115–28.

Osguthorpe RT, Graham CR. Blended learning environments: definitions and directions. Quarterly Rev Dist Educ. 2003;4(3):227–33.

Doherty I, Blake A. Personalised Learning: A Case Study in Teaching Clinical Educators Instructional Design Skills. In: O’Donoghue J, editor. Technology-Supported Environments for Personalized Learning: Methods and Case Studies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference; 2010. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-884-0.ch012.

Atkins S, Yan W, Meragia E, Mahomed H, Rosales-Klintz S, Skinner D, Zwarenstein M. Student experiences of participating in five collaborative blended learning courses in Africa and Asia: a survey. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:28145. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.28145.

Goldner BW, Bollinger RC. Global health education for medical students: new learning opportunities and strategies. Medical Teacher. 2012;34(1):e58–63. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.638008.

Morris SM, Stommel J. MOOCagogy: Assessment, networked learning and the meta-MOOC. In: Hybrid Pedagogy. 2013.http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/moocagogy-assessment-networked-learning-and-the-meta-mooc/. Accessed 4 Apr 2015.

Atkins S, Varshney D, Meragia E, Zwarenstein M, Diwan V. Research clinics’: online journal clubs between south and north for student mentoring. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:30434. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v9.30434.

Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, Carr PL, Ash AS, Szalacha L, Moskowitz MA. Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in US medical schools. Acad Med. 1998;73(3):318–23.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Health Research Policy and Systems

Tập 14

1-12

Thông tin tác giả