A qualitative analysis of institutional drivers and barriers to blended learning adoption in higher education

Internet and Higher Education - Tập 28 - Trang 17-27 - 2016
Wendy W. Porter1, Charles R. Graham2, Robert G. Bodily1, Daniel S. Sandberg1
1Brigham Young University, USA
2Brigham Young University USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen, 2007, Online nation: Five years of growth in online learning Allen, 2007, Blending in: The extent and promise of blended education in the United States Beggs, 2000, Influences and barriers to the adoption of instructional technology Christo-Baker, 2004, Distance education leadership in higher education institutions: Explored within theoretical frameworks of organizational change and diffusion of innovations theory, 251 Findik, 2013, A model for instructors' adoption of learning management systems: Empirical validation in higher education context, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 13 Garrison, 2007 Geoghegan, 1994, Whatever happened to instructional technology? Graham, 2013, Emerging practice and research in blended learning, 333 Graham, 2007, Realizing the transformational potential of blended learning: Comparing cases of transforming blends and enhancing blends in higher education, 83 Graham, 2013, A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4, 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003 Humbert, 2007, Adoption of blended learning by faculty: An exploratory analysis, 423 Kaleta, 2007, Discovering, designing, and delivering hybrid courses, 111 Lin, 2014, Barriers to the adoption of ICT in teaching Chinese as a foreign language in US universities, ReCALL, 26, 100, 10.1017/S0958344013000268 Lincoln, 1985 McCann, 2010, Factors affecting the adoption of an e-assessment system, Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 799, 10.1080/02602930902981139 Merriam, 1998 Moore, 2002 Mtebe, 2014, Challenges and instructors' intention to adopt and use open educational resources in higher education in Tanzania, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15, 249, 10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1687 Ngimwa, 2012, An empirical investigation of the emergent issues around OER adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa, Learning, Media and Technology, 37, 398, 10.1080/17439884.2012.685076 Norberg, 2011, A time-based blended learning model, On the Horizon, 19, 207, 10.1108/10748121111163913 Oh, 2009, How are universities involved in blended instruction?, Educational Technology & Society, 12, 327 Picciano, 2009, Blending with purpose: The multimodal model, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13, 7 Porter, 2015, Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education, British Journal of Educational Technology Porter, 2014, Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation, Computers & Education, 75, 185, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011 Rogers, 2003 Ross, 2006, Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT and our customers in higher education, 155 Surry, 2000, Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology, Innovations in Education & Training International, 37, 145, 10.1080/13558000050034501 Swan, 2009, Examining barriers in faculty adoption of an e-portfolio system, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 627, 10.14742/ajet.1112 Thackray, 2010, Learning and teaching in virtual worlds: Boundaries, challenges and opportunities, 139 The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2010 Zhou, 2007, Adoption of educational technology: How does gender matter?, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19, 140