Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It

Allport G. W., 1936, Psychological Monographs, 47, 1, 10.1037/h0093360

Andreski, S. (1972). Social sciences as sorcery. London: Deutsch.

Aronson E., 1966, Psychonomic Science, 4, 227, 10.3758/BF03342263

Bakan D., 1966, Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423, 10.1037/h0020412

Barber B., 1961, Science, 134, 596, 10.1126/science.134.3479.596

Betz, N. E. (Ed.). (1986). The g factor in employment [Special issue]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 29(3).

Brink C., 1987, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, 38, 533, 10.1093/bjps/38.4.533

10.1086/286432

Carnap R., 1945, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 513, 10.2307/2102817

Carnap, R. (1966). Philosophical foundations of physics. New York: Bas~c.

Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. New York: Oxford University Press.

Carver R. P., 1978, Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378, 10.17763/haer.48.3.t490261645281841

Chow S. L., 1987, Journal of Psychology, 121, 259, 10.1080/00223980.1987.9712666

10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.105

Cronbach L. J., 1955, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281, 10.1037/h0040957

10.1037/0003-066X.42.2.145

Dawes, R. M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. Chicago: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Dawes R. M., 1989, Science, 243, 1668, 10.1126/science.2648573

Draper, N. & Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.

Dworkin R. M., 1967, Universtty of Chicago Law Review, 35, 14, 10.2307/1598947

Eisberg, R. M. (1961). Fundamentals of modern physics. New York: W~ley.

Evans C., 1941, Journal of Psychology, 12, 1

Faust, D. (1984). The limits of scientific reasoning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Feyerabend, P. (1970). Against method. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Minnesota studies in thephilosophy of science: Vol. IV. Analyses of theories and methods of physics andpsychology (pp. 17-130). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. London: Oliver & Boyd.

Fisher, R. A. (1937). The design of experiments (2nd ed.). London: Oliver & Boyd.

Fiske, D. W. & Shweder, R. A. (1986). Metatheory in social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Freud, S. (1957). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement. In J. Strachey (Ed. &Trans.), The standard edition of the completepsychological works of SigmundFreud (Vol. 14, pp. 7-66). London: Hogarth. (Original work published 1914)

Geller S. A., 1983, Autopsy. Scientific American, 248, 124, 10.1038/scientificamerican0383-124

Giere, R. N. (1984). Understanding scientific reasoning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Glass, G. V., Cahen, L. S., Smith, M. L. & Filby, N. K. (1982). School class size: Research andpolicy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. &Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Glymour, C. (1980). Theory and evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Golden R., 1978, Annals of Human Genetzcs London, 41, 507, 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1978.tb00924.x

10.1086/289462

Gough, H. G. (1987). CPI, Administrator's guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Hacking I., 1988, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, 277, 10.1093/bjps/39.3.277

Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

10.1037//0003-066X.42.5.443

Hodgman, C. D. (Compiler). (1941). Mathematical tables from handbook of chemistry and physics (7th ed.). Cleveland, OH: Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.

Hogarth, R. M. (1987). Judgment andchoice: Thepsychology ofdecision. New York: Wiley.

Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L. & Jackson, G. B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating researchfindings across studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P. & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Kern L. H., 1983, Social Studies of Science, 13, 1, 10.1177/030631283013001003

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.; Vol. 2, No. 2 of International Encyclopedia of Unzjied Science). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakatos, 1968, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 69, 149, 10.1093/aristotelian/69.1.149

Lakatos, I. (1 970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-195). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted in J. Worrall & G. Currie [Eds.], Imre Lakatos: Philosophical papers. Vol. I: The methodology of scientific research programmes [pp. 8- 1011. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978)

Lakatos, I. (1971). History of science and its rational reconstructions. In R. C. Buck & R. S. Cohen (Eds.), P. S. A. (1970 Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, pp. 91-135). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel. (Reprinted in J. Worrall & G. Currie [Eds.], Imre Lakatos: Philosophical papers. Vol. I: The methodology of scientific research programmes [pp. 102-1381. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978)

Landefeld C. S., 1983, New England Journal of Medicine, 318, 1249, 10.1056/NEJM198805123181906

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lewis D., 1970, Journal of Philosophy, 67, 427, 10.2307/2023861

10.1037//0022-3514.37.6.833

Lykken D. T., 1968, Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151, 10.1037/h0026141

MacCorquodale, K. & Meehl, P. E. (1954). E. C. Tolman. In W. K. Estes, S. Koch, K. MacCorquodale, P. E. Meehl, C. G. Mueller, W. N. Schoenfeld, & W. S. Verplanck, Modern learning theory (pp. 177-266). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Mahoney, M. J. (1976). Scientist a s subject: The psychological imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

Maxwell, G. (1962). The ontological status of theoretical entities. In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 3. Scientific explanations, space, and time (pp. 3-27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Maxwell, G. (1970). Structural realism and the meaning of theoretical terms. In M. Radner & S. Winokur (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 4. Analyses of theories and methods of physics and psychology (pp. 18 1- 192). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl P. E., 1962, American Psychologist, 17, 827, 10.1037/h0041029

Meehl, P. E. (1964). Minnesota-FordProjectgenotypicpersonality items [IBM and compatibles machine-readable data file]. (Available, with the Minnesota-Ford pool of phenotypic personality items, from P. E. Meehl, Department of Psychology, N218 Elliott Hall, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, MimeapoIis, MN 55455)

10.1086/288135

Meehl P. E., 1971, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 143, 10.1037/h0030750

Meehl P. E., 1972, International Journal of Mental Health, 1, 10, 10.1080/00207411.1972.11448562

Meehl, P. E. (1973a). MAXCOV-HITMAX: A taxonomic search method for loose genetic syndromes. In P. E. Meehl, Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers (pp. 200-224). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1973b). Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

10.1037//0022-006X.46.4.806

Meehl, P. E. (1983a). Consistency tests in estimating the completeness of the fossil record: A neo-Popperian approach to statistical paleontology. In J. Earman (Ed.), Minnesota studies in thephilosophy of science: Vol. X. Testing scientific theories (pp. 413-473). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1983b). Subjectivity in psychoanalytic inference: The nagging persistence of Wilhelm Fliess's Achensee question. In J. Earman ( ~ d ), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. X. Testing scientific theories (pp. 349-41 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1984). Foreword. In D. Faust, The limitsof scientific reasoning (pp. xi-xxiv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

10.1207/s15327752jpa5003_6

Meehl, P. E. (1986b). Diagnostic taxa as open concepts: Metatheoretical and statistical questions about reliability and construct validity in the grand strategy of nosological revision. In T. Millon & G. L. Klerman (Eds.), Contemporary directions in psychopathology (pp. 215-23 1). New York: Guilford.

Meehl P. E., 1989, Archives of General Psychiatry, 46, 935, 10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810100077015

Meehl, P. E. (1990a). Corroboration and verisimilitude: Against Lakatos' "sheer leap offaith" (Working paper). Minneapolis: Minnesota Center for Philosophy of Science.

Meehl, P. E. (1990b). Schizotaxia as an open concept. In A. I. Rahin, R. Zucker, R. Emmons, & S. Frank (Eds.), Studying persons and lives (pp. 248-303). New York: Springer.

10.2466/PR0.66.1.195-244

Meehl P. E., 1990, Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 1, 10.1521/pedi.1990.4.1.1

Meehl, P. E. &Golden, R. (1982). Taxometric methods. In P. Kendall & J. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinicalpsychology (pp. 127-181). New York: Wiley.

Meehl P. E., 1971, Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 5, 171

Meehl, P. E., Schofield, W., Glueck, B. C., Studdiford, W. B., Hastings, D. W., Hathaway, S. R. & Clyde, D. J. (1962). Minnesota-Ford pool of phenotypic personality items (August 1962 ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Morrison, D. E. & Henkel, R. E. (Eds.). (1970). The significance test controversy. Chicago: Aldine.

Neurath, 0. (1932-1933). Protokollsatze. Erkenntnis, 3. (Trans. as "Protocol sentences" by F. Schick in A. J. Ayer [Ed.], LogicaEpositivism [pp. 201-2041, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1959)

Nisbett, R. E. &Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of human judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Nye, M. J. (1972). Molecular reality. London: Macdonald.

O'Hear, A. (1980). Karl Popper. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Pap A., 1953, Methodos, 5, 3

Pap, A. (1958). Semantics and necessary truth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Pap, A. (1962). An introduction to the philosophy of science. New York: Free Press.

Peppard T. A., 1949, Minnesota Medicine, 32, 510

Penin, J. B. (1916). Atoms (D. L. Hammick, Trans.). New York: Van Nostrand. (Original work published 1913)

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic. (Original work published 1935)

Popper, K. R. (1962). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Basic.

Popper, K. R. (1983). Postscript to the logic of scientific discovery: Vol. I . Realism and the aim of science W. W. Bartley I11 (Ed.). Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory ofjustice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience andprediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rozehoom W. W., 1960, Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416, 10.1037/h0042040

Salmon, W. C . (1984). Scientijic explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sawyer J., 1966, Psychological Bulletin, 66, 178, 10.1037/h0023624

Schilpp, P. A. (Ed.). (1974). Thephilosophy of Karl Popper. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.

Serlin R. C., 1985, American Psychologist, 40, 73, 10.1037/0003-066X.40.1.73

Simon H. A., 1945, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40, 80

Sines J., 1970, British Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 129, 10.1192/bjp.116.531.129

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.

10.1037//0003-066X.32.8.638

Smith, M . L., Glass, G . V. &Miller, T. I. (1980). The benefitsofpsychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Suppe, F. (Ed.). (1977). The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Taton, R. (1957). Reason and chance in scienti$c discovery. London. Hutchinson.

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Thurstone, L. L. & Thurstone, T. G . (1941). Factorial studies of intelligence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Worrall, J. & Currie, G. (Eds.). (1978a). Imre Lakatos: Philosophical papers. Vol. I : The methodology of scientific research programmes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Worrall, J. & Cunie, G. (Eds.). (1978b). Imre Lakatos: Philosophical papers.Vol. 2: Mathematics, science and epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wren, P. C. (1925). Beau Geste. New York: Frederick A. Stokes.

Ziman, J. (1978). Reliable knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.