Alternative nomenclatural procedures as a potential benefit to natural history collections

Olivier Béthoux1
1CSIRO,

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Béthoux, O. (2007a). Propositions for a character-state-based biological taxonomy. Zoologica Scripta, 36, 409–416.

Béthoux, O. (2007b). Cladotypic taxonomy revisited. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 65, 127–133.

Béthoux, O. (2007c). Cladotypic taxonomy applied: titanopterans are orthopterans. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 65, 135–156.

Béthoux, O. (2008). Revision and phylogenetic affinities of the lobeattid species bronsoni Dana, 1864 and silvatica Laurentiaux & Laurentiaux-Vieira, 1980 (Pennsylvanian; Archaeorthoptera). Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny, 66, 145–163.

Béthoux, O. (2010). Optimality of phylogenetic nomenclatural procedures. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 10, 173–191.

Cantino P. D., & de Queiroz, K. (2007). International code of phylogenetic nomenclature, ver. 4b. http://www.ohio.edu/phylocode/ . Accessed 15 January 2009.

Cantino, P. D., & de Queiroz, K. (2010). International code of phylogenetic nomenclature, ver. 4c. http://www.ohio.edu/phylocode/ . Accessed 6 April 2010.

Dubois, A. (2010a). Nomenclatural rules in zoology as a potential threat against natural history museums. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 10, 81–90.

Dubois, A. (2010b). Zoological nomenclature in the century of extinctions: priority vs. ‘usage’. Organisms Diversity & Evolution, 10, 259–274.