A comparison of the shock-absorbing properties of cervical disc prosthesis bearing materials

SAS Journal - Tập 5 - Trang 48-54 - 2011
Michael C. Dahl1, Stephen Jacobsen2, Newton Metcalf3, Rick Sasso4, Randal P. Ching5
1Disc Dynamics Inc., Eden Prairie, MN
2Department of Orthopedics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
3Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN
4Indiana Spine Group, Indianapolis, IN
5Applied Biomechanics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Fuller, 1998, A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis, Spine, 23, 1649, 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00006 Eck, 2002, Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion, Spine, 27, 2431, 10.1097/00007632-200211150-00003 Baba, 1993, Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy, Spine, 18, 2167, 10.1097/00007632-199311000-00004 Goffin, 2004, Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine, J Spinal Disord Tech, 17, 79, 10.1097/00024720-200404000-00001 Ishihara, 2004, Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion, Spine J, 4, 624, 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.011 Hilibrand, 1999, Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 81, 519, 10.2106/00004623-199904000-00009 Anderson, 2004, Intervertebral disc arthroplasty, Spine, 29, 2779, 10.1097/01.brs.0000146460.11591.8a DiAngelo, 2004, In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant, Neurosurg Focus, 17, E7, 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.7 DiAngelo, 2003, Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate, J Spinal Disord Tech, 16, 314, 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00002 Pickett, 2005, Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc, Spine, 30, 1949, 10.1097/01.brs.0000176320.82079.ce Sasso, 2008, Cervical kinematics after fusion and Bryan disc arthroplasty, J Spinal Disord Tech, 21, 19, 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180500778 Kasra, 1992, Dynamics of human lumbar intervertebral joints, Spine, 17, 93, 10.1097/00007632-199201000-00014 Panjabi, 2001, Mechanical properties of the human cervical spine as shown by three-dimensional load-displacement curves, Spine, 26, 2692, 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00012 LeHuec, 2003, Shock absorption in lumbar disc prosthesis: a preliminary mechanical study, J Spinal Disord Tech, 16, 346, 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00006 Dahl, 2006, Dynamic characteristics of the intact, fused, and prosthetic-replaced cervical disk, J Biomech Eng, 128, 809, 10.1115/1.2354207 Kang, 2010, Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study, Neurosurg Focus, 28, E9, 10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1046 Lin, 2009, Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study, Spine, 34, 1554, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b Allen, 1994, Acceleration perturbations of daily living, Spine, 19, 1285, 10.1097/00007632-199405310-00017 Moroney, 1988, Analysis and measurement of neck loads, J Orthop Res, 6, 713, 10.1002/jor.1100060514 Moroney, 1988, Load-displacement properties of lower cervical spine motion segments, J Biomech, 21, 769, 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90285-0 Anderson, 2003, Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis, Spine, 28, S186, 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092212.42388.79 Anderson, 2004, The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results, Spine J, 4, 303S, 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.026 Pitzen, 2007, Cervical spine disc prosthesis: radiographic, biomechanical and morphological post mortal findings 12 weeks after implantation, Eur Spine J, 16, 1015, 10.1007/s00586-007-0312-3 Hu, 2006, Porous coated motion cervical disc replacement: a biomechanical, histomorphometric, and biologic wear analysis in a caprine model, Spine, 31, 1666, 10.1097/01.brs.0000224537.79234.21 Anderson, 2004, A comparison of simulator-tested and -retrieved cervical disc prostheses, J Neurosurg Spine, 1, 202, 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0202 Coury, 1987, Biostability considerations for implantable polyurethanes, Life Support Syst, 5, 25 Phillips, 1988, Biomedical applications of polyurethanes: implications of failure mechanisms, J Biomater Appl, 3, 207, 10.1177/088532828800300204 Stokes, 1988, Polyether polyurethanes: biostable or not?, J Biomater Appl, 3, 228, 10.1177/088532828800300205 Heller, 2009, Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial, Spine, 34, 101, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263