A Technique for Eliminating Water Returns from Lidar Beach Elevation Surveys

Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology - Tập 25 Số 9 - Trang 1671-1682 - 2008
Marissa Yates1, R. T. Guza1, Roberto Gutiérrez2, Richard J. Seymour1
1Scripps Institution of Oceanography. La Jolla, California.
2The University of Texas at AustinAustin, Texas

Tóm tắt

Abstract Airborne light detecting and ranging (lidar) systems can survey hundreds of kilometers of shoreline with high spatial resolution (several elevation estimates per square meter). Sequential surveys yield spatial change maps of beach and dune sand levels. However, lidar data include elevations of the exposed, subaerial beach and, seaward of the waterline, the ocean surface. Here, a simple method is developed to find the waterline and eliminate returns from the ocean surface. A vertical elevation cutoff is used, with the waterline elevation (W) above the known tide level because of the superelevation from wave setup and runup. During each lidar pass, the elevation cutoff (W) is assumed proportional (C) to the offshore significant wave height Hs. Comparison of in situ and lidar surveys on a moderately sloped, dissipative California beach yields C ≈ 0.4, which is qualitatively consistent with existing observations of runup and setup. The calibrated method rejects ocean surface data, while retaining subaerial beach points more than 70 m seaward of the mean high waterline, which is often used as a conservative default waterline.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Battjes, J. , 1974: Surf similarity. Proc. 14th Conf. on Coastal Engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark, American Society of Civil Engineers, 466–480.

Brock, 2002, Basis and methods of NASA Airborne Topographic Mapper lidar surveys for coastal studies., J. Coastal Res., 18, 1

Gares, 2006, Using LIDAR to monitor a beach nourishment project at Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina, USA., J. Coastal Res., 22, 1206, 10.2112/06A-0003.1

Guenther, 2000, Meeting the accuracy challenge in airborne lidar bathymetry.

Holman, 1986, Extreme value statistics for wave run-up on a natural beach., Coastal Eng., 9, 527, 10.1016/0378-3839(86)90002-5

Krabill, 2000, Airborne laser mapping of Assateague National Seashore Beach., Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 66, 65

Mobley, 1994, Light and Water: Radiative Transfer in Natural Waters.

Morton, 1993, Monitoring beach changes using GPS surveying techniques., J. Coastal Res., 9, 702

Raubenheimer, 2001, Field observations of wave-driven setdown and setup., J. Geophys. Res., 106, 4629, 10.1029/2000JC000572

Revell, 2002, An application of LIDAR to analyses of El Niño erosion in the Netarts littoral cell, Oregon., J. Coastal Res., 18, 792

Robertson, 2007, Hurricane-induced beach change derived from airborne laser measurements near Panama City, Florida., Mar. Geol., 237, 191, 10.1016/j.margeo.2006.11.003

Ruggiero, 2001, Wave runup, extreme water levels and the erosion of properties backing beaches., J. Coastal Res., 17, 407

Sallenger, 2002, Sea-cliff erosion as a function of beach changes and extreme wave runup during the 1997–1998 El Niño., Mar. Geol., 187, 279, 10.1016/S0025-3227(02)00316-X

Sallenger, 2003, Evaluation of airborne topographic lidar for quantifying beach changes., J. Coastal Res., 19, 125

Saye, 2005, Beach-dune morphological relationships and erosion/accretion: An investigation at five sites in England and Wales using LIDAR data., Geomorphology, 72, 128, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.05.007

Seymour, 2005, Rapid erosion of a small southern California beach fill., Coastal Eng., 52, 151, 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.10.003

Shrestha, 2005, Airborne laser swath mapping: Quantifying changes in sandy beaches over time scales of weeks to years., Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 59, 222, 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2005.02.009

Stockdon, 2002, Estimation of shoreline position and change using airborne topographic lidar data., J. Coastal Res., 18, 502

Stockdon, 2006, Empirical parameterization of setup, swash, and runup., Coastal Eng., 53, 573, 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2005.12.005

Thomson, 2006, Tidal modulation of infragravity wave via nonlinear energy losses in the surfzone., Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 10.1029/2005GL025514

Wehr, 1999, Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview., Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 54, 68, 10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00011-8

Woolard, 2002, Spatial characterization, resolution, and volumetric change of coastal dunes using airborne LIDAR: Cape Hatteras, North Carolina., Geomorphology, 48, 269, 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00185-X

Young, 2006, Application of airborne LIDAR for seacliff volumetric change and beach-sediment budget contributions., J. Coastal Res., 22, 307, 10.2112/05-0548.1

Zhang, 2005, Quantification of beach changes caused by Hurricane Floyd along Florida’s Atlantic Coast using airborne laser surveys., J. Coastal Res., 21, 123, 10.2112/02057.1