Testing theories of fairness—Intentions matter

Games and Economic Behavior - Tập 62 - Trang 287-303 - 2008
Armin Falk1,2, Ernst Fehr3, Urs Fischbacher3
1IZA, Bonn, Germany
2University of Bonn Bonn, Germany
3University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abbink, 2000, The moonlighting game—An experimental study on reciprocity and retribution, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 42, 265, 10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00089-5

Andreoni, 2002, Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism, Econometrica, 70, 737, 10.1111/1468-0262.00302

Bewley, 1999

Blount, 1995, When social outcomes aren't fair: The effect of causal attributions on preferences, Organ. Behav. Human Dec. Proc., 63, 131, 10.1006/obhd.1995.1068

Bolton, 2000, ERC—A theory of equity, reciprocity and competition, Amer. Econ. Rev., 90, 166, 10.1257/aer.90.1.166

Bolton, 1998, Measuring motivations for the reciprocal responses observed in a simple dilemma game, Exper. Econ., 1, 207, 10.1007/BF01669343

Bolton, 2005, Fair procedures: Evidence from games involving lotteries, Econ. J., 115, 1054, 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01032.x

Brandts, 2000, Hot and cold decisions and reciprocity in experiments with sequential games, Exper. Econ., 2, 227, 10.1007/BF01669197

Brandts, 2001, Reference points and negative reciprocity in simple sequential games, Games Econ. Behav., 36, 138, 10.1006/game.2000.0818

Camerer, 1995, Ultimatums, dictators, and manners, J. Econ. Perspect., 9, 209, 10.1257/jep.9.2.209

Charness, 2004, Attribution and reciprocity in an experimental labor market, J. Lab. Econ., 22, 665, 10.1086/383111

Charness, G., Dufwenberg, M., 2003. Promises & partnership. Working papers in Economics 2003-3. Stockholm University

Charness, 2002, Understanding social preferences with simple tests, Quart. J. Econ., 117, 817, 10.1162/003355302760193904

Cox, 2004, How to identify trust and reciprocity, Games Econ. Behav., 46, 260, 10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00119-2

Dufwenberg, 2004, A theory of sequential reciprocity, Games Econ. Behav., 47, 268, 10.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003

Engelmann, 2004, Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments, Amer. Econ. Rev., 94, 857, 10.1257/0002828042002741

Falk, 2006, A theory of reciprocity, Games Econ. Behav., 54, 293, 10.1016/j.geb.2005.03.001

Falk, 2003, On the nature of fair behavior, Econ. Inquiry, 41, 20, 10.1093/ei/41.1.20

Fehr, 2000, Fairness and retaliation—The economics of reciprocity, J. Econ. Perspect., 14, 159, 10.1257/jep.14.3.159

Fehr, 1999, A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation, Quart. J. Econ., 114, 817, 10.1162/003355399556151

Fischbacher, 2007, z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments, Exper. Econ., 10, 171, 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4

Gouldner, 1960, The norm of reciprocity, Amer. Sociological Rev., 25, 161, 10.2307/2092623

Güth, 2001, The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games, Games Econ. Behav., 37, 161, 10.1006/game.2000.0829

Kagel, 2001, Tests of fairness models based on equity considerations in a three-person ultimatum game, Exper. Econ., 4, 203, 10.1007/BF01673533

Kahneman, 1986, Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market, Amer. Econ. Rev., 76, 728

Levine, 1998, Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments, Rev. Econ. Dynam., 1, 593, 10.1006/redy.1998.0023

Offerman, 2002, Hurting hurts more than helping helps, Europ. Econ. Rev., 46, 1423, 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00176-3

Rabin, 1993, Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics, Amer. Econ. Rev., 83, 1281