Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships

Journal of Applied Econometrics - Tập 16 Số 3 - Trang 289-326 - 2001
M. Hashem Pesaran1, Yongcheol Shin2, Richard J. Smith3
1Trinity College, Cambridge CB2 1TQ, UK
2Department of Economics, University of Edinburgh, 50 George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9JY, UK
3Department of Economics, University of Bristol, 8 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TN, UK

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis paper develops a new approach to the problem of testing the existence of a level relationship between a dependent variable and a set of regressors, when it is not known with certainty whether the underlying regressors are trend‐ or first‐difference stationary. The proposed tests are based on standardF‐ andt‐statistics used to test the significance of the lagged levels of the variables in a univariate equilibrium correction mechanism. The asymptotic distributions of these statistics are non‐standard under the null hypothesis that there exists no level relationship, irrespective of whether the regressors areI(0) orI(1). Two sets of asymptotic critical values are provided: one when all regressors are purelyI(1) and the other if they are all purelyI(0). These two sets of critical values provide a band covering all possible classifications of the regressors into purelyI(0), purelyI(1) or mutually cointegrated. Accordingly, various bounds testing procedures are proposed. It is shown that the proposed tests are consistent, and their asymptotic distribution under the null and suitably defined local alternatives are derived. The empirical relevance of the bounds procedures is demonstrated by a re‐examination of the earnings equation included in the UK Treasury macroeconometric model. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1093/0198288107.001.0001

10.1111/1467-9892.00091

10.1111/j.1468-0084.1986.mp48003005.x

10.3386/w1950

Boswijk P, 1992, Cointegration, Identification and Exogeneity: Inference in Structural Error Correction Models

10.1016/0304-4076(93)01560-9

10.1016/0304-4076(94)01665-M

10.1017/S0266466600009981

ChanA SavageD WhittakerR.1995.The new treasury model. Government Economic Series Working Paper No. 128 (Treasury Working Paper No. 70).

10.1108/01443589310038524

10.2307/2286348

10.2307/1912517

10.2307/1913236

10.1017/S0266466600009397

10.1017/S0266466600009993

10.2307/1392608

Hendry DF, 1984

10.2307/2938278

10.1016/0304-4076(92)90019-N

10.1093/0198774508.001.0001

10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00005.x

Layard R, 1991, Unemployment: Macroeconomic Performance and the Labour Market

Lindbeck A, 1989, The Insider Outsider Theory of Employment and Unemployment

10.2307/2234339

10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041610

NielsenB RahbekA.1998.Similarity issues in cointegration analysis. Preprint No. 7 Department of Theoretical Statistics University of Copenhagen.

Park JY, 1990, Advances in Econometrics: Cointegration, Spurious Regressions and Unit Roots

Pesaran MH, 1997, Working with Microfit 4.0: Interactive Econometric Analysis

10.1017/CCOL521633230.011

10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00073-1

10.1111/j.1468-0335.1958.tb00003.x

10.2307/2297602

10.2307/2938339

10.1214/aos/1176348666

10.1111/1368-423X.00021

Sargan JD, 1964, Econometric Analysis of National Economic Planning, 275

10.1017/S0266466600008240

10.1080/01621459.1988.10478707

Urbain JP, 1992, On weak exogeneity in error correction models, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 187, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.mp54002004.x