Sociology of Health and Illness

Công bố khoa học tiêu biểu

* Dữ liệu chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo

Sắp xếp:  
Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry (Book).
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 7 Số 1 - Trang 124-124 - 1985
Doreen McBarnet
The impact of management on medical professionalism: a review
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 34 Số 4 - Trang 626-644 - 2012
Dino Numerato, Domenico Salvatore, Giovanni Fattore
AbstractIn the last three decades, medical doctors have increasingly been exposed to management control measures. This phenomenon has been reflected in a number of studies in various disciplines, including sociology, organisation studies, management, and health service research. This article seeks to provide a comprehensive overview of the studies dealing with the impact of management on professional control. In particular, it seeks to bridge the diversity of assumptions, theoretical perspectives and conceptual underpinnings at play, by exploring synergies between them and opening up new horizons for research. The review shows how the relationship between clinicians and management has been analysed at an organisational level using two interconnected analytical frameworks focusing on the sociocultural and task‐related dimensions of professionalism. In the final discussion, we argue that comparative, longitudinal and cross‐sectional research is necessary, and there is a need to overcome the hegemony/resistance framework in current analyses of the impact of management on professionalism. Such an approach would contribute to the revision of macro theories of professionalism and stimulate emerging research by examining different perspectives towards management in medical specialisations. This approach might also stimulate a discussion of medical professionals’ relationships with members of other professional groups, including nurses and healthcare managers.
Explanations and expectations: drug narratives among young cannabis users in treatment
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 37 Số 6 - Trang 870-887 - 2015
Margaretha Järvinen, Signe Ravn
AbstractThis article analyses how young people enrolled in drug addiction treatment in Copenhagen, Denmark, explain their cannabis careers and how they view their possibilities for quitting drug use again. Inspired by Mead and narrative studies of health and illness, the article identifies four different drug use ‘aetiologies’ drawn upon by the interviewees. These cover childhood experiences, self‐medication, the influence of friends and cannabis use as a specific lifestyle. A central argument of the article is that these explanations not only concern the past but also point towards the future by assigning the interviewee a more or less agential position in relation to drugs. Further, the drug narratives are viewed as interactional achievements, related to the social context in which they were produced, namely, the institutional setting of the treatment centres. The article is based on 30 qualitative interviews with young people in drug addiction treatment.
Apostasy to orthodoxy: debates before a Commission of Inquiry into chiropractic
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 22 Số 3 - Trang 310-330 - 2000
Kevin Dew
This paper examines the arguments presented at the Royal Commission of Inquiry into chiropractic, which took place in New Zealand in 1978. Drawing on the work of Potter, it suggests that the protagonists in the debate, the medical profession and its allies on one side and the chiropractic profession on the other, developed rhetorical strategies to counter competing versions of the world. An unusual feature of this debate was that it took place before ‘impartial’ judges. The paper demonstrates the delicate process of negotiation performed by chiropractic groups when confronting medicine in an open forum. The paper concludes that in order to resolve the competing rhetorics, the Commissioners sought for a compromise, which at once embedded chiropractic within the public health service in New Zealand and ‘de‐radicalised’ its claims.
How ‘we’ are different from ‘them’: occupational boundary maintenance in the treatment of musculo‐skeletal problems
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 23 Số 1 - Trang 24-43 - 2001
Pauline Norris
Strategies of occupational control at the macro‐level have been described by many sociologists. This paper draws on a study of the division of labour in the treatment of musculo‐skeletal problems in New Zealand to look at micro‐level strategies of occupational control. These are rhetorical strategies used by individual practitioners to establish and maintain occupational boundaries. Practitioners used these strategies to distinguish their occupation from others, creating a sense of professional identity and enabling claims to jurisdiction over an area of work. Many of these strategies involved notions of limitation (i.e. other occupations are limited because they do not possess something we do), holism (we are holistic in our approach while others are not), and prevention (we prevent problems by treating the causes, while others treat the symptoms).
Unemployment and health: selection or causation ‐ a false antithesis?
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 10 Số 1 - Trang 41-67 - 1988
Mel Bartley
Abstract Observations on the effect of unemployment on health include note that the clustering in certain geographic areas of low income, job insecurity and poor housing are the experience of the same groups of people. Considerable difficulties exist in isolating the different aspects involved. Nonetheless, it is argued (1) that the effects of each separate strand are dependent upon and reinforced by the others; (2) that it is possible to clarify the ways in which the elements interrelate; and (3) that it is the whole pattern that most satisfactorily explains currently available data on unemployment and health.
Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction: therapists' practices for displaying access to clients' inner experiences
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 38 Số 4 - Trang 645-661 - 2016
Elina Weiste, Liisa Voutilainen, Anssi Peräkylä
AbstractThe relationship between a psychotherapist and a client involves a specific kind of epistemic asymmetry: in therapy sessions the talk mainly concerns the client's experience, which is unavailable, as such, to the therapist. This epistemic asymmetry is understood in different ways within different psychotherapeutic traditions. Drawing on a corpus of 70 audio‐recorded sessions of cognitive psychotherapy and psychoanalysis and using the method of conversation analysis, the interactional practices of therapists for dealing with this epistemic asymmetry are investigated. Two types of epistemic practices were found to be employed by therapists while formulating and interpreting the client's inner experience. In the formulations, the therapists and clients co‐described the client's experience, demonstrating that the client's inner experience was somewhat similarly available to both participants. In the interpretations, the therapists constructed an evidential foundation for the interpretation by summarising the client's talk and using the same descriptive terms as the client. Clients held therapists accountable for this epistemic work: if they failed to engage in such work, their right to know the client's inner experience was called into question.
Initiating decision‐making in neurology consultations: ‘recommending’ versus ‘option‐listing’ and the implications for medical authority
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 35 Số 6 - Trang 873-890 - 2013
Merran Toerien, Rebecca Shaw, Markus Reuber
AbstractThis article compares two practices for initiating treatment decision‐making, evident in audio‐recorded consultations between a neurologist and 13 patients in two hospital clinics in the UK. We call these ‘recommending’ and ‘option‐listing’. The former entails making a proposal to do something; the latter entails the construction of a list of options. Using conversation analysis (CA), we illustrate each, showing that the distinction between these two practices matters to participants. Our analysis centres on two distinctions between the practices: epistemic differences and differences in the slots each creates for the patient’s response. Considering the implications of our findings for understanding medical authority, we argue that option‐listing – relative to recommending – is a practice whereby clinicians work to relinquish a little of their authority. This article contributes, then, to a growing body of CA work that offers a more nuanced, tempered account of medical authority than is typically portrayed in the sociological literature. We argue that future CA studies should map out the range of ways – in addition to recommending – in which treatment decision‐making is initiated by clinicians. This will allow for further evidence‐based contributions to debates on the related concepts of patient participation, choice, shared decision‐making and medical authority.
Fitting proposals to their sequential environment: a comparison of turn designs for proposing treatment in ongoing outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 37 Số 4 - Trang 522-544 - 2015
Shuya Kushida, Yuriko Yamakawa
AbstractThis study is an attempt to describe an interactional strategy that psychiatrists use in making decisions for treatment in ongoing outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using conversation analysis (CA), we compare sequential environments where psychiatrists use two turn designs for proposing a treatment: the inclusive ‘we’ form (for example ‘let's’ and ‘how about’) and the declarative evaluation (for example, ‘it might be better’). The inclusive ‘we’ form is used to create the moment for decision when the sequential environment is ready for decision‐making. The declarative evaluation is used to propose a treatment cautiously when the sequential environment is not yet ready for decision‐making. Taken together, psychiatrists fit the turn design of a proposal to its sequential environment in such a way as to display their attention to the patients’ perspectives. In conclusion, we argue that our finding provides further evidence for the claim made by a growing body of CA research that, unlike the traditional sociological understanding of doctor–patient interaction, doctors do not simply impose their perspectives upon the patients but steer medical encounters to their preferred direction by orienting to the patients’ perspectives.
Sociology of diagnosis: a preliminary review
Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 31 Số 2 - Trang 278-299 - 2009
Annemarie Jutel
AbstractDiagnoses are the classification tools of medicine, and are pivotal in the ways medicine exerts its role in society. Their sociological study is commonly subsumed under the rubrics of medicalisation, history of medicine and theory of disease. Diagnosis is, however, a powerful social tool, with unique features and impacts which deserve their own specific analysis. The process of diagnosis provides the framework within which medicine operates, punctuates the values which medicine espouses, and underlines the authoritative role of both medicine and the doctor. Diagnosis takes place at a salient juncture between illness and disease, patient and doctor, complaint and explanation. Despite calls for its establishment, almost two decades ago (Brown 1990), there is not yet a clear sociology of diagnosis. This paper argues that there should be, and, as a first step, draws together a number of threads of medical sociology that potentially contribute to this proposed sociology of diagnosis, including the place of diagnosis in the institution of medicine, the social framing of disease definitions, the means by which diagnosis confers authority to medicine, and how that authority is challenged. Through this preliminary review, I encourage sociology to consider the specific role of diagnosis in view of establishing a specific sub‐disciplinary field.
Tổng số: 29   
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3