Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction: therapists' practices for displaying access to clients' inner experiences

Sociology of Health and Illness - Tập 38 Số 4 - Trang 645-661 - 2016
Elina Weiste1, Liisa Voutilainen1, Anssi Peräkylä1
1Finnish Centre of Excellence in Research on Intersubjectivity in Interaction, University of Helsinki

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe relationship between a psychotherapist and a client involves a specific kind of epistemic asymmetry: in therapy sessions the talk mainly concerns the client's experience, which is unavailable, as such, to the therapist. This epistemic asymmetry is understood in different ways within different psychotherapeutic traditions. Drawing on a corpus of 70 audio‐recorded sessions of cognitive psychotherapy and psychoanalysis and using the method of conversation analysis, the interactional practices of therapists for dealing with this epistemic asymmetry are investigated. Two types of epistemic practices were found to be employed by therapists while formulating and interpreting the client's inner experience. In the formulations, the therapists and clients co‐described the client's experience, demonstrating that the client's inner experience was somewhat similarly available to both participants. In the interpretations, the therapists constructed an evidential foundation for the interpretation by summarising the client's talk and using the same descriptive terms as the client. Clients held therapists accountable for this epistemic work: if they failed to engage in such work, their right to know the client's inner experience was called into question.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Beck A., 1979, Cognitive Therapy of Depression

10.1017/CBO9780511490002.004

10.1075/tsl.62

Bois J.W., 2014, Towards dialogical syntax, Cognitive Linguistics, 25, 359, 10.1515/cog-2014-0024

10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.005

Fitzgerald P., 2013, Therapy Talk. Conversation Analysis in Practice

Gertler B., 2003, Privileged Access: Philosophical Accounts of Self‐Knowledge

Greenson R., 1967, The Technique and Practice of Psychoanalysis

10.1017/CBO9780511490002.009

10.1080/08351810701331299

10.1017/CBO9780511921674.008

10.1080/08351813.2012.646685

Heritage J., 2013, The Handbook of Conversation Analysis

10.1177/1461445613501449

10.1177/019027250506800103

10.1075/pbns.125.02jef

Lomas P., 1987, The Limits of Interpretation

10.1080/08351813.2014.900212

10.1093/ptr/kph026

10.1017/CBO9780511490002

Peräkylä A., 2011, After interpretation, Third position utterances in psychoanalysis, Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44, 288

10.1515/text.1.1991.11.3.441

10.1177/09579265030146003

10.1016/j.pragma.2009.10.003

10.1017/S0047404506060325

Sacks H., 1984, Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis

10.1353/lan.1974.0010

Schutz A., 1967, The Phenomenology of the Social World

10.1017/S0047404514000037

Toskala A., 2005, Minuuden rakentuminen. Psyykkinen kehitys ja kognitiivis‐konstruktiivinen psykoterapia

10.1515/text.2003.022

10.1017/CBO9780511490002.008

10.1017/CBO9780511490002.012

10.1080/08351810903474799

10.1080/08351813.2013.839093

10.1080/10503307.2013.879619