Cancer Imaging

  1470-7330

 

 

Cơ quản chủ quản:  BioMed Central Ltd. , BMC

Lĩnh vực:
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingOncologyRadiological and Ultrasound TechnologyMedicine (miscellaneous)

Các bài báo tiêu biểu

Quantifying tumour heterogeneity with CT
Tập 13 Số 1 - Trang 140-149 - 2013
Balaji Ganeshan, Kenneth Miles
Imaging of liver metastases: MRI
Tập 7 Số 1 - Trang 2-9 - 2007
Saravanan Namasivayam, Diego R. Martín, Sanjay Saini
Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from metastatic brain tumor using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion and perfusion metrics at 3 T
Tập 12 Số 3 - Trang 423-436 - 2012
Ioannis Tsougos, Patricia Svolos, Evanthia Kousi, Konstantinos Fountas, Kyriaki Theodorou, Ioannis Fezoulidis, Eftychia Kapsalaki
Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma
Tập 12 Số 3 - Trang 464-474 - 2012
Hsin‐Yi Wang, Hueisch‐Jy Ding, Jin-Hua Chen, Chih-Hao Chao, Yu-Yu Lu, Wan‐Yu Lin, Chia‐Hung Kao
Comparison of biparametric and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer
- 2019
Lili Xu, Gumuyang Zhang, Bing Shi, Yanhan Liu, Tingting Zou, Weigang Yan, Yu Xiao, Huadan Xue, Feng Feng, Jing Lei, Zhengyu Jin, Hao Sun
Abstract Purpose

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) and to explore the application value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in prostate imaging.

Methods and materials

This study retrospectively enrolled 235 patients with suspected PCa in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017, and all lesions were histopathologically confirmed. The lesions were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS V2). The bpMRI (T2-weighted imaging [T2WI], diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]/apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) and mpMRI (T2WI, DWI/ADC and DCE) scores were recorded to plot the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) for each method were calculated and compared. The patients were further stratified according to bpMRI scores (bpMRI ≥3, and bpMRI = 3, 4, 5) to analyse the difference in DCE MRI between PCa and non-PCa lesions (as well as between csPCa and non-csPCa).

Results

The AUC values for the bpMRI and mpMRI protocols for PCa were comparable (0.790 [0.732–0.840] and 0.791 [0.733–0.841], respectively). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of bpMRI for PCa were 76.2, 79.5, 72.6, 75.8, and 76.6%, respectively, and the values for mpMRI were 77.4, 84.4, 69.9, 75.2, and 80.6%, respectively. The AUC values for the bpMRI and mpMRI protocols for the diagnosis of csPCa were similar (0.781 [0.722–0.832] and 0.779 [0.721–0.831], respectively). The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of bpMRI for csPCa were 74.0, 83.8, 66.9, 64.8, and 85.0%, respectively; and 73.6, 87.9, 63.2, 63.2, and 87.8%, respectively, for mpMRI. For patients with bpMRI scores ≥3, positive DCE results were more common in PCa and csPCa lesions (both P = 0.001). Further stratification analysis showed that for patients with a bpMRI score = 4, PCa and csPCa lesions were more likely to have positive DCE results (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of bpMRI is comparable with that of mpMRI in the detection of PCa and the identification of csPCa. DCE MRI is helpful in further identifying PCa and csPCa lesions in patients with bpMRI ≥3, especially bpMRI = 4, which may be conducive to achieving a more accurate PCa risk stratification. Rather than omitting DCE, we think further comprehensive studies are required for prostate MRI.

Radiogenomics of breast cancer using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and gene expression profiling
- 2019
Albert C. Yeh, Hui Li, Yangyong Zhu, Jing Zhang, Galina Khramtsova, Karen Drukker, Alexandra Edwards, Stephanie M. McGregor, Toshio F. Yoshimatsu, Yonglan Zheng, Qun Niu, Hiroyuki Abé, Jeffrey Mueller, Suzanne D. Conzen, Yuan Ji, Maryellen L. Giger, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
Can morphological MRI differentiate between primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma?
- 2016
Hana Malíková, Eva Koubská, J. Weichet, Jan Klener, Aaron Rulseh, Roman Liščák, Zdeněk Vojtěch
FDG-PET/CT for pre-operative staging and prognostic stratification of patients with high-grade prostate cancer at biopsy
- 2015
Jean-Mathieu Beauregard, Annie-Claude Blouin, Vincent Fradet, André Caron, Claude Lemay, Louis Lacombe, Thierry Dujardin, Rabi Tiguert, Goran Rimac, F Bouchard, Frédéric Pouliot
Contrast-enhanced CT radiomics for predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a pilot study
- 2020
Ke Li, Qiandong Yao, Jingjing Xiao, Meng Li, Jiali Yang, Wenjing Hou, Mingshan Du, Kang Chen, Yuan Qu, Lian Li, Jing Li, Xianqi Wang, Haoran Luo, Jia Yang, Zhuoli Zhang, Wei Chen
Abstract Background

We developed a computational model integrating clinical data and imaging features extracted from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images, to predict lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

Methods

This retrospective study included 159 patients with PDAC (118 in the primary cohort and 41 in the validation cohort) who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography examination between 2012 and 2015. All patients underwent surgery and lymph node status was determined. A total of 2041 radiomics features were extracted from venous phase images in the primary cohort, and optimal features were extracted to construct a radiomics signature. A combined prediction model was built by incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical characteristics selected by using multivariable logistic regression. Clinical prediction models were generated and used to evaluate both cohorts.

Results

Fifteen features were selected for constructing the radiomics signature based on the primary cohort. The combined prediction model for identifying preoperative lymph node metastasis reached a better discrimination power than the clinical prediction model, with an area under the curve of 0.944 vs. 0.666 in the primary cohort, and 0.912 vs. 0.713 in the validation cohort.

Conclusions

This pilot study demonstrated that a noninvasive radiomics signature extracted from contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging can be conveniently used for preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with PDAC.

Predicting malignant potential of subsolid nodules: can radiomics preempt longitudinal follow up CT?
Tập 19 Số 1 - 2019
Subba R. Digumarthy, Atul Padole, Shivam Rastogi, Max Price, Meghan J. Mooradian, Lecia V. Sequist, Mannudeep K. Kalra