Radiogenomics of breast cancer using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and gene expression profiling
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aerts HJ. The potential of radiomic-based phenotyping in precision medicine: a review. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:1636–42.
Colen R, et al. NCI workshop report: clinical and computational requirements for correlating imaging phenotypes with genomics signatures. Transl Oncol. 2014;7:556–69.
Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278:563–77.
Grönroos TJ, et al. Hypoxia, blood flow and metabolism in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck: correlations between multiple immunohistochemical parameters and PET. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:876.
Rasmussen GB, et al. Immunohistochemical biomarkers and FDG uptake on PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1408–15.
Meyer HJ, Höhn A, Surov A. Histogram analysis of ADC in rectal cancer: associations with different histopathological findings including expression of EGFR, Hif1-alpha, VEGF, p53, PD1, and KI 67. A preliminary study. Oncotarget. 2018;9:18510–7.
Zhao K, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in laryngeal carcinoma is associated with the expression of glucose transporter-1 and hypoxia-inducible-factor-1α and the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway. Oncol Lett. 2014;7:984–90.
Surov A, Meyer HJ, Wienke A. Associations between PET parameters and expression of Ki-67 in breast Cancer. Transl Oncol. 2019;12:375–80.
Surov A, et al. Associations between [18F]FDG-PET and complex histopathological parameters including tumor cell count and expression of KI 67, EGFR, VEGF, HIF-1α, and p53 in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019;21:368–74.
Raza SM, et al. Identification of necrosis-associated genes in glioblastoma by cDNA microarray analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:212–21.
Bhooshan N, et al. Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:5995–6008.
Bhooshan N, et al. Cancerous breast lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: computerized characterization for image-based prognostic markers. Radiology. 2010;254:680–90.
Colen RR, et al. Imaging genomic mapping of an invasive MRI phenotype predicts patient outcome and metabolic dysfunction: a TCGA glioma phenotype research group project. BMC Med Genet. 2014;7:30.
Aerts HJ, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006.
Agrawal G, et al. MRI features of breast cancer: a correlation study with HER-2 receptor. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1903–4.
Chen J-H, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: MRI features in 29 patients. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:2042–3.
Chen W, Giger ML, Lan L, Bick U. Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys. 2004;31:1076–82.
Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, Bick U, Newstead GM. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:562–71.
Gilhuijs KG, Giger ML, Bick U. Computerized analysis of breast lesions in three dimensions using dynamic magnetic-resonance imaging. Med Phys. 1998;25:1647–54.
Burnside ES, et al. Using computer-extracted image phenotypes from tumors on breast magnetic resonance imaging to predict breast cancer pathologic stage. Cancer. 2016;122:748–57.
Guo W, Li H, Zhu Y, Giger M, Ji Y. Prediction of clinical phenotypes in invasive breast carcinomas from the integration of radiomics and genomic data. J Medical Imaging. 2015;2(4):041007-12.
Li H, et al. MR imaging Radiomics signatures for predicting the risk of breast Cancer recurrence as given by research versions of MammaPrint, Oncotype DX, and PAM50 gene assays. Radiology. 2016;152110. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016152110 .
Li H, et al. Quantitative MRI radiomics in the prediction of molecular classifications of breast cancer subtypes in the TCGA/TCIA dataset. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2016;2:16012.
Zhu Y, et al. Deciphering genomic underpinnings of quantitative MRI-based Radiomic phenotypes of invasive breast carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17787.
Surov A, Meyer HJ, Wienke A. Can imaging parameters provide information regarding histopathology in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? A meta-analysis. Transl Oncol. 2018;11:498–503.
Gierach GL, et al. Relationships between computer-extracted mammographic texture pattern features and BRCA1/2 mutation status: a cross-sectional study. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:424.
Li H, et al. Pilot study demonstrating potential association between breast cancer image-based risk phenotypes and genomic biomarkers. Med Phys. 2014;41:031917.
Mazurowski MA, et al. Recurrence-free survival in breast cancer is associated with MRI tumor enhancement dynamics quantified using computer algorithms. Eur J Radiol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.012 .
Ashraf AB, et al. Identification of intrinsic imaging phenotypes for breast cancer tumors: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles. Radiology. 2014;272:374–84.
Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U, Newstead GM. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI. Med Phys. 2006;33:2878–87.
Mazurowski MA, Zhang J, Grimm LJ, Yoon SC, Silber JI. Radiogenomic analysis of breast cancer: luminal B molecular subtype is associated with enhancement dynamics at MR imaging. Radiology. 2014;273:365–72.
Giger M, Li H, Lan L, Abe H, Newstead G. Quantitative MRI phenotyping of breast Cancer across molecular classification subtypes. In: Proc. 12th International Workshop, vol. 8539. Gifu: Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2014. p. 195–200. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_28 .
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.
Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–9.
Chen W, Giger ML, Bick U. A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:63–72.
Chen W, et al. Computerized assessment of breast lesion malignancy using DCE-MRI robustness study on two independent clinical datasets from two manufacturers. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:822–9.
Kanehisa M, Goto S, Sato Y, Furumichi M, Tanabe M. KEGG for integration and interpretation of large-scale molecular data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D109–14.
Subramanian A, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:15545–50.
Väremo L, Nielsen J, Nookaew I. Enriching the gene set analysis of genome-wide data by incorporating directionality of gene expression and combining statistical hypotheses and methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4378–91.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.
Mao Y, et al. The value of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115103.
Dushyanthen S, et al. Relevance of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer. BMC Med. 2015;13:202.
O’Connor JPB, Jackson A, Parker GJM, Roberts C, Jayson GC. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:167–77.
Dafni H, Landsman L, Schechter B, Kohen F, Neeman M. MRI and fluorescence microscopy of the acute vascular response to VEGF165: vasodilation, hyper-permeability and lymphatic uptake, followed by rapid inactivation of the growth factor. NMR Biomed. 2002;15:120–31.
Gallagher FA. An introduction to functional and molecular imaging with MRI. Clin Radiol. 2010;65:557–66.