the nature of the european leadership crisis and how to solve it

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 16 - Trang 34-47 - 2017
femke van esch1
1Utrecht University School of Governance, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Observers of the European Union (EU) agree that it suffers from a leadership crisis. However, diagnoses of the precise nature of this crisis vary: some lament the lack of strong, visionary leaders, while others argue that the EU suffers from too much elite leadership. This article takes issue with both diagnoses and argues that the root of Europe’s leadership crisis lies in the misfit between the nature of EU leadership and the legitimating logic it is rooted in. All leadership implies inequality and therefore requires solid justification especially in the democratic European context. However, at the European level, the vectors of legitimacy that provide such justification are weak and contradictory, thereby tempting leaders to overstep the level of justification bestowed on them. Making use of ideological and identity leadership may help European leaders overcome the misfit between leadership and legitimacy that lies at the root of the leadership crisis.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barber, B.R. (ed.) (1998) ‘Neither Leaders nor Followers: Citizenship under Strong Democracy’, in A Passion for Democracy: American Essays, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 95–110.

Boin, A., ‘t Hart, P., Stern, E. and Sundelius, B. (2005) The Politics of Crisis Management: Public Leadership Under Pressure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burns, J.M. (1978) Leadership, New York: Harper and Row.

Chandler, A. (2015) ‘Germany Wins a Negotiation Battle, but May Lose a PR War’. The Atlantic,http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2015/07/germany-greece-debt-euro-zone/398870/, accessed 17 July 2015.

Evans, P.B., Jacobson, P.B. and Putnam, R.D. (1993) Double-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkley: University of California Press.

Haslam, S.A., Reicher, S.D. and Platow, M.J. (2011) The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power, London: Psychology Press.

Helms, L. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘Introduction: Leadership Questions in Transnational European Governance’, European Political Science, doi 10.1057/eps.2015.113.

Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow, London: Penguin.

Kane, J. and Patapan, H. (2012) The Democratic Leader: How Democracy Defines, Empowers, and Limits its Leaders, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kassim, H. (2016, this issue of European Political Science) ‘What’s New? A first Appraisal of the Juncker Commission’, European Political Science doi: 10.1057/eps.2015.116.

Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Boston: Little, Brown.

Krotz, U. and Schild, J. (2013) Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and Embedded Bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to Twenty-First Century Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

McNamara, K.R. (2010) ‘The Eurocrisis and the Uncertain Future of European integration’. Council on Foreign Relations, Working Paper, New York: The Council of Foreign Relations.

Van Esch, F.A.W.J. and Swinkels, E.M. (2015) ‘Making sense of the Euro crisis: The influence of pressure and personality’, West European Politics 38(6): 1203–1225.

Van Middelaar, L. (2013) The Passage to Europe, London: Yale University Press.

Westfall, A. (2013) ‘The consequences of crisis: A call for coordinated leadership’, German Studies Review 36(1): 140–142.