structural domination and structural freedom: a feminist perspective

Feminist Review - Tập 94 - Trang 1-19 - 2010
Jennifer Einspahr

Tóm tắt

After an initial period of feminist theorizing concerned with understanding patriarchy as a structure of male domination, many thinkers turned away from theorizing domination as such and focused instead on women's (constructed) subjectivity, identity, and agency. While this has fostered important insights into the formation of women's preferences, desires, and choices, this focus on subjectivity and subject formation has largely overshadowed deeper understandings of patriarchy as a structure of male domination while producing elisions between agency and freedom. In this article, I move to show how domination as a structural concept can help us to reclaim the idea of ‘patriarchy’ as a source of women's systematic oppression while freedom as non-domination, derived from early republican conceptualizations of freedom, can help us to disambiguate freedom from agency by taking as central the relative positions of actors within social and political structures. Structural freedom as non-domination is thus useful for feminist thinkers in that it gives us critical purchase on the dynamics inherent in unequal social and political relationships and can be linked clearly to the institutions and ideologies that shape and justify interactions between more powerful and less powerful groups. Further, from this point of view intersecting structures of domination can be analysed rather than intersecting identity categories, allowing us to take intersectionality into account and avoiding the need to ground feminist action on a unitary ‘category woman’. Finally, this analysis points toward the radical democratic connexion between freedom and participation in the creation of the material and symbolic structures that frame our collective lives.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahearn, L. (2001) ‘Language and agency’ Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 30: 109–137. Beauvoir, S. (1952) ‘Introduction’ The Second Sex, in Parshley, H.M. (1989) editor, New York: Vintage Books. Berlin, I. (1998) Four Essays on Liberty, New York: Oxford University Press. Bickford, S. (1996) The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, and Citizenship, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Bickford, S. (1997) ‘Anti-anti-identity politics: feminism democracy, and the complexities of citizenship’ Hypatia, Vol. 12, No. 4: 111–113. Bickford, S. (2000) ‘Constructing inequality: city spaces and the architecture of citizenship’ Political Theory, Vol. 28, No. 3: 355–376. Bourdieu, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bourdieu, P. (2001) Masculine Domination, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Brown, W. (1992) ‘Finding the man in the state’ Feminist Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1: 7–34. Brown, W. (1995) States of Injury, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Brush, L.D. (2003) Gender and Governance, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press. Butler, J. (1997) The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Cornell, D. (1995) The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography and Sexual Harassment, New York: Routledge. Cornell, D. (1998) At the Heart of Freedom, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Connell, R. (1987) Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Crenshaw, K. (1998) ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics’ in Philips, A. (1998) editor, Feminism and Politics, New York: Oxford University Press, 314–343. Giddens, A. (1993) ‘Problems of action and Structure’ in Cassell, P. (1993) editor, The Giddens Reader, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Hays, S. (1994) ‘Structure and agency and the sticky problem of culture’ Sociological Theory, Vol. 12, No. 1: 57–72. Higginbotham, E.B. (1992) ‘African-American women's history and the metalanguage of race’ Signs, Vol. 17, No. 2: 251–274. Hirschmann, N.J. (1996) ‘Toward a feminist theory of freedom’ Political Theory, Vol. 24, No. 1: 46–67. Hirschmann, N.J. (2003) The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom, Princeton: Princeton University Press. hooks, b. (2000) Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, Cambridge, MA: South End Press. Jordan, J. (2004) ‘A new politics of sexuality’ in Balliet, B. (2004) editor, Women, Culture, and Society: A Reader, Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing, 75–78. King, D. (1998) ‘Multiple jeopardy multiple consciousness’ Signs, Vol. 14, No. 1: 42–72. Lorber, J. (1995) Paradoxes of Gender, New Haven: Yale University Press. MacKinnon, C.A. (1982) ‘Feminism, marxism, method, and the state: an agenda for theory’ Signs, Vol. 7, No. 3: 515–544. MacKinnon, C.A. (1988) Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. MacKinnon, C.A. (1991) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Markell, P. (2008) ‘The insufficiency of non-domination’ Political Theory, Vol. 36, No. 1: 9–36. Miriam, K. (2007) ‘Toward a phenomenology of sex-right: reviving radical feminist theory of compulsory heterosexuality’ Hypatia, Vol. 22, No. 1: 210–228. Pateman, C. (1988) The Sexual Contract, Stanford: Stanford University Press. Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pettit, P. (2001) A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency, New York: Oxford University Press. Redstockings Collective (1969) ‘Redstockings manifesto’ in Schneir, M. (1969) editor, Feminism in Our Time, New York: Vintage Books, 125–129. Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sen, A.K. (1992) Inequality Reexamined, New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Sen, A.K. (1999) Development as Freedom, New York: Knopf. Sewell, W.H.J. (1992) ‘A theory of structure: duality agency, and transformation’ The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 98, No. 1: 1–29. Skinner, Q. (1998) Liberty before Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sunstein, C.R. (1991) ‘Preferences and politics’ Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 1: 3–34. Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992) ‘The structure and logic of Bourdieu's sociology’ in Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992) editors, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Wollstonecraft, M. (1792) A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, New York: Penguin Classics. Young, I.M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press. Young, I.M. (2002) Inclusion and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press. Young, I.M. (2005) On Female Body Experience: ‘Throwing Like a Girl’ and Other Essays, New York: Oxford University Press. Zerilli, L.M.G. (2005) Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.