Working with laboratory rodents in Spain: a survey on welfare and wellbeing
Tóm tắt
Replacement, reduction and refinement, the 3R principles, provide a framework to minimize the use and suffering of animals in science. In this context, we aimed to determine the actual perception that individuals working with laboratory rodents in biomedical research have on animal welfare and on their interaction with the animals, as well as how they perceive its impact on their social relations. To this end, we designed an anonymous on-line survey for people working with rodents, at three responsibility levels, in Spain. Of the 356 participants, 239 were women (67 %); 263 were researchers (74 %), and 93 animal facility staff (26 %), of which 55 were caretakers/technicians (15 %), and 38 welfare officer/veterinarians (11 %). Animal facility staff indicated environmental enrichment to be a universal practice. About half of the participants reported that, in their opinion, animals suffer “little to none” or “minor” stress and pain. Animal caretakers/technicians and researchers perceived higher levels of stress and pain than welfare officers/veterinarians. Participants judged decapitation the most unpleasant method to kill rodents, whereas anaesthetic overdose was the least one. A sizable proportion − 21 % of animal caretakers/technicians and 11.4 % of researchers - stated that they were never given the choice not to euthanize the rodents they work with. Overall, women reported higher interactions with animals than men. Nevertheless, we could detect a significant correlation between time spent with the animals and interaction scores. Notably, 80 % of animal facility staff and 92 % of researchers rarely talked about their work with laboratory rodents with people outside their inner social circle. Overall, the participants showed high awareness and sensitivity to rodent wellbeing; animal facility staff reported a similar perception on welfare questions, independently of their category, while researchers, who spent less time with the animals, showed less awareness and manifested lower human-animal interaction and less social support. Regarding the perception on social acceptance of laboratory animal work, all groups were cautious and rarely talked about their job, suggesting that it is considered a sensitive issue in Spain.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Animal Welfare Committee. FAWC Report on Farm Animal Welfare in Great Britain: Past, Present and Future. 2009. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/fawc-report-on-farm-animal-welfare-in-great-britain-past-present-and-future. Accessed 17 June 2021.
Russell WMS, Burch RL. The principles of humane experimental technique. London: Methuen; 1959. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb73127.x.
Tannenbaum J, Bennett BT. Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2015;54(2):120–32.
Toth LA, Kregel K, Leon L, Musch TI. Environmental enrichment of laboratory rodents: the answer depends on the question. Comp Med. 2011;61(4):314–21.
Baumans V. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research. ILAR J. 2005;46(2):162–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.46.2.162.
Hutchinson E, Avery A, Vandewoude S. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents. ILAR J. 2005;46(2):148–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.46.2.148.
National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011.
Flecknell P. Laboratory Animal Anaesthesia. 4th ed. London: Academic Press; 2015.
Carbone L, Austin J. Pain and laboratory animals: publication practices for better data reproducibility and better animal welfare. PLoS One. 2016;11(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155001.
Stokes EL, Flecknell PA, Richardson CA. Reported analgesic and anaesthetic administration to rodents undergoing experimental surgical procedures. Lab Anim. 2009;43(2):149–54. https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2008.008020.
Richardson CA, Flecknell PA. Anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia following experimental surgery in laboratory rodents: are we making progress? Altern Lab Anim. 2005;33(2):119–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/026119290503300207.
Ortega-Sáez I, Vila S, Azkona G. Percepción del usuario del animal de laboratorio sobre analgesia, anestesia y eutanasia en roedores. Anim Lab. 2017;73:27–31 https://secal.es/indice-revista-secal/. Accessed 17 June 2021.
Shomer NH, Allen-Worthington KH, Hickman DL, Jonnalagadda M, Newsome JT, Slate AR, et al. Review of Rodent Euthanasia Methods. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2020;59(3):242–53. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-19-000084.
Andrukonis A, Hall NJ, Protopopova A. The Impact of Caring and Killing on Physiological and Psychometric Measures of Stress in Animal Shelter Employees: A Pilot Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9196. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249196.
Newsome JT, Clemmons EA, Fitzhugh DC, Gluckman TL, Creamer-Hente MA, Tambrallo LJ, et al. Compassion Fatigue, Euthanasia Stress, and Their Management in Laboratory Animal Research. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2019;58(3):289–92. https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000092.
Molina-Cimadevila M, Romero-Molina A, García-Robles T. al. E. Eutanasia de roedores: sobre como nos sentimos nosotros. XIV Congreso SECAL. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria 2017. Personal communication.
Chang FT, Hart LH. Human-animal bonds in the laboratory: how animal behavior affects the perspectives of caregivers. ILAR J. 2002;43(1):10–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar.43.1.10.
Neely C, Lane C, Torres J, Flinn J. The Effect of Gentle Handling on Depressive-Like Behavior in Adult Male Mice: Considerations for Human and Rodent Interactions in the Laboratory. Behav Neurol. 2018;2018:2976014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2976014.
Gouveia K, Hurst JL. Improving the practicality of using non-aversive handling methods to reduce background stress and anxiety in laboratory mice. 2019;9(1):20305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56860-7.
Tremoleda JL, Kerton A. Creating space to build emotional resilience in the animal research community. Lab Anim (NY). 2020;49(10):275–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41684-020-0637-7.
LaFollette MR, Riley MC, Cloutier S, Brady CM, O’Haire ME, Gaskill BN. Laboratory Animal Welfare Meets Human Welfare: A Cross-Sectional Study of Professional Quality of Life, Including Compassion Fatigue in Laboratory Animal Personnel. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00114.
De la Fuente M, Souto A, Caselli C, Schiel N. People’s perception on animal welfare: why does it matter? Ethnobiology Conservation. 2017;6(18):1.
European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 442 “Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare”. 2015. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s2096_84_4_442_eng?locale=en. Accessed 17 June 2021.
Pejman N, Kallas Z, Dalmau A, Velarde A. Should Animal Welfare Regulations Be More Restrictive? A Case Study in Eight European Union Countries. Animals (Basel). 2019;9(4):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040195.
European Commission. Special Eurobarometer 340: Science and Technology. 2010. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/s806_73_1_ebs340?locale=en. Accessed 17 June 2021.
Singer P. Animal Liberation: a new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: HarperCollins Publishers; 1975.
Donaldson S, Kymlicka W. Zoopolis. A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
Ministerio de Agricultura,Pesca y Alimentación. Informes sobre usos de animales en experimentación y otros fines científicos, incluyendo la docencia. 2019. https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/produccion-y-mercados-ganaderos/informedeusodeanimalesen2019_tcm30-550894.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2021.
Azkona G, Saavedra A, Aira Z, Aluja D, Xifró X, Baguley T, et al. Striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase modulates nociception: evidence from genetic deletion and pharmacological inhibition. Pain. 2016;157(2):377–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000329.
Hawkins P, Prescott MJ, Carbone L, Dennison N, Johnson C, Makowska IJ, et al. A Good Death? Report of the Second Newcastle Meeting on Laboratory Animal Euthanasia. Animals (Basel). 2016;6(9):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani6090050.
Herzog HA. Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions. A Review Anthrozoös. 2007;20(1):7–21. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279307780216687.
Hernández A, Hidalgo MD, Hambleton RK, Gómez-Benito J. International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema. 2020;32(3):390–8. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306.