Các bài toán từ liên quan đến việc sử dụng các chiến lược chức năng của học sinh lớp 4

Ayala-Altamirano, C., & Molina, M. (2019a). Meanings Attributed to Letters in Functional Contexts by Primary School Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10012-5. Ayala-Altamirano, C., & Molina, M. (2019b). Justificación y expresión de la generalización de una relación funcional por estudiantes de cuarto de primaria [Justification and expression of the generalization of a functional relationship by fourth grade students]. In J. M. Marbán, M. Arce, A. Maroto, J. M. Muñoz-Escolano y Á. Alsina (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXIII (pp. 183-192). Valladolid: SEIEM. Bednarz, N. (2001). A problem-solving approach to algebra: accounting for the reasonings and notations developed by students. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J. Vincent (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra: Proceedings of the 12th ICMI Study Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 69–78). Victoria: University of Melbourne. Bills, L., & Rowland, T. (1999). Examples, generalisation and proof. Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794809909461549. Blanton, M. L. (2008). Algebra in elementary classrooms: transforming thinking, transforming practice. Portsmouth: Heinemann. Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2004). Elementary grades students’ capacity for functional thinking. In Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 135–142). Bergen: Bergen University College. Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011). Functional thinking as a route into algebra in the elementary grades. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization, advances in mathematics education: a global dialogue from multiple perspective (pp. 5–23). Berlinm Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_2. Blanton, M. L., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K. & Newman-Owens, A. (2015). A Learning Trajectory in 6-Year-Olds’ Thinking About Generalizing Functional Relationships. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(5), 511–558. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.5.0511. Blanton, M. L., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2017). A progression in first-grade children’s thinking about variable and variable notation in functional relationships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9745-0. Blanton, M., Levi, L., Crites, T., Dougherty, B., & Zbiek, R. M. (2011). Developing essential understanding of algebraic thinking for teaching mathematics in grades 3–5. In R. M. Zbiek (Ed.), Essential understanding series. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: Reston. Brizuela, B. M. & Earnest, D. (2008). Multiple notational systems and algebraic understandings: The case of the “best deal” problem. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 273–301). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group; Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Brizuela, B. M., Blanton, M., Sawrey, K., Newman-Owens, A., & Gardiner, A. (2015). Children’s use of variables and variable notation to represent their algebraic ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981939. Cai, J., & Howson, A. G. (2012). Toward an international mathematics curriculum. In M. A. Clements, A. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & K. S. F. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education research (pp. 949–974). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_29. Cañadas, M. C., & Castro, E. (2007). A proposal of categorisation for analysing inductive reasoning. PNA, 1(2), 67–78. Cañadas, M. C., & Fuentes, S. (2015). Pensamiento funcional de estudiantes de primero de educación primaria: Un estudio exploratorio [Functional thinking in first-year primary teacher students: an exploratory study]. In C. Fernández, M. Molina, & N. Planas (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XIX (pp. 211–220). Alicante: SEIEM. Cañadas, M. C., Brizuela, B. M., & Blanton, M. (2016). Second graders articulating ideas about linear functional relationships. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.10.004. Cañadas, M. C., Castro, E., & Castro, E. (2008). Patrones, generalización y estrategias inductivas de estudiantes de 3° y 4° de educación secundaria obligatoria en el problema de las baldosas [Patterns, Generalization and Inductive Strategies of Secondary Students Working on the Tiles Problem]. PNA, 2(3), 137–151. Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669–705). Greenwich: Information Age Publishing. Carraher, D. W., Martinez, M. V., & Schliemann, A. D. (2008). Early algebra and mathematical generalization. ZDM, 40(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0067-7. Earnest, D. (2014). Exploring functions in elementary school: leveraging the representational context. In K. Karp (Ed.), Annual perspectives in mathematics education: using research to improve instruction (pp. 171–179). Reston: NCTM. Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early gNew Yorkrades (pp. 5–17). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Kieran, C. (2006). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra: a broadening of sources of meaning. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the pscyhology of mathematics education: past, present and future (pp. 11–49). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016). Early algebra. Research into its nature, its learning, its teaching. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32258-2. Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lannin, J., Barker, D., & Townsend, B. (2006). Algebraic generalisation strategies: factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217440. Larson, R., & Hostetler, R. (2008). Precálculo (7th ed.). México: Reverté Ediciones. Larsson, K., & Pettersson, K. (2015). Discerning multiplicative and additive reasoning in co-variation problems. In X. Sun, B. Kaur, & J. Novotná (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Commission of Mathematical Instruction (ICMI) Study 23 Conferenceon the Primary Mathematics Study on Whole Numbers (pp. 559–566). Macau: University of Macau. Lee, K., Ng, S. F., & Bull, R. (2018). Learning and solving algebra word problems: the roles of relational skills, arithmetic, and executive functioning. Developmental Psychology, 54(9), 1758–1772. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000561. MacGregor, M., & Stacey, K. (1995). The effect of different approaches to algebra on students’ perception of functional relationships. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217276. Martí, E., & Pozo, J. I. (2000). Más allá de las representaciones mentales: La adquisición de los sistemas externos de representación [Beyond mental representations: The acquisition of external systems of representation]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 90, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037000760087946. Mason, J. (1996). Expressing generality and roots of algebra. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran, & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 65–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Mason, J. (2008). Making use of children’s powers to produce algebraic thinking. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 57–94). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mason, J. (2018). Structuring structural awareness: a commentary on chap. 13. In M. G. B. Bussi & X. H. Sun (Eds.), Building the foundation: whole numbers in the primary grades (pp. 325–340). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Mason, J., & Pimm, D. (1984). Generic examples: seeing the general in the particular. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312078. McEldoon, K. L., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2010). Assessing elementary students’ functional thinking skills: the case of function tables. In P. Brosnan, D. Erchick, & L. Flevares (Eds.), Proceedings of the Thirty Second Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education: Optimizing Student Understanding in Mathematics (p. 202). Columbus: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Educationn. Merino, E., Cañadas, M., & Molina, M. (2013). Uso de representaciones y patrones por alumnos de quinto de Educación Primaria en una tarea de generalización [Use of representations and patterns by fifth grade primary school students in a generalization task]. Edma 0-6: Educación Matemática en la Infancia, 2(1), 24–40. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. (2014). Real Decreto 126/2014 de 28 de febrero, por el que se establece el currículo básico de la Educación Primaria [Royal Decree 126/2014 of February 28, which establishes the basic curriculum of primary education]. BOE, 52, 19349–19420. Molina, M., Ambrose, R., & del Rio, A. (2018). First encounter with variables by first and third grade Spanish students. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds. ICME-13 monographs (pp. 261–280). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_11. Morales, R., Cañadas, M., Brizuela, B., & Gómez, P. (2018). Relaciones funcionales y estrategias de alumnos de primero de Educación Primaria en un contexto funcional [Functional relationships and strategies of first graders in a functional context]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 36(3), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.2472. Moss, J., & Beatty, R. (2006). Knowledge building and knowledge forum: grade 4 students collaborate to solve linear generalizing problems. In J. Novotná, H. Moraová, M. Krátká, & N. Stehlíková (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 193–199). Prague: PME. Moss, J., & McNab, S. L. (2011). An approach to geometric and numeric patterning that fosters second grade students’ reasoning and generalizing about functions and co- variation. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization. A global dialogue from multiple perspectives (pp. 277–301). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_16. Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217544. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: Author. Pang, J., & Kim, J. (2018). Characteristics of Korean students’ early algebraic thinking: a generalized arithmetic perspective. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds. ICME-13 monographs (pp. 141–165). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_6. Pinto, E., & Cañadas, M. C. (2018). Generalización y razonamiento inductivo en una estudiante de cuarto de primaria. Un estudio de caso desde el pensamiento funcional [Generalization and inductive reasoning by a fourth grader. A case study from the functional thinking approach]. In L. J. Rodríguez-Muñiz, L. Muñiz-Rodríguez, A. Aguilar-González, P. Alonso, F. J. García García, & A. Bruno (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XXII (pp. 457–466). Gijón: SEIEM. Pinto, E., Cañadas, M. C., Moreno, A., & Castro, E. (2016). Relaciones funcionales que evidencian estudiantes de tercero de educación primaria y sistemas de representación que usan [Functional relationships evidenced by third graders and the representation they systems used]. In C. Fernández, J. L. González, F. J. Ruiz, J. A. Macías, A. Jiménez, M. T. Sánchez, P. Hernández, T. Fernández, & A. Berciano (Eds.), Investigación en Educación Matemática XX (pp. 417–426). Málaga: SEIEM. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: a semiotic perspective. In J. L. C. S. Alatorre, M. Sáiz, & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, North American Chapter (Vol. 1, pp. 2–21). Mérida: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Radford, L. (2010). Layers of generality and types of generalization in pattern activities. PNA, 4(2), 37–62. Radford, L. (2011). Grade 2 students’ non-symbolic algebraic thinking. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: a global dialogue from multiple perspectives. Advances in Mathematics Education Monograph Series (pp. 303–322). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_17. Radford, L. (2013). En torno a tres problemas de la generalización [Concerning three problems of generalization]. In L. Rico, M. C. Cañadas, J. Gutiérrez, M. Molina, & I. Segovia (Eds.), Investigación en didáctica de la matemática. Homenaje a Encarnación Castro (pp. 3–12). Editorial Comares: Granada. Radford, L. (2018). The emergence of symbolic algebraic thinking in primary school. In C. Kieran (Ed.), Teaching and learning algebraic thinking with 5- to 12-year-olds. ICME-13 monographs (pp. 3–25). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68351-5_1. Rico, L. (2007). La competencia matemática en PISA [Mathematical competence in PISA]. PNA, 1(2), 47–66. Rico, L., Castro, E., Castro, E., Coriat, M., Marín, A., & Puig, L. (1997). La educación matemática en la enseñanza secundaria [Mathematical education in secondary education]. Barcelona: Editorial Horsori. Smith, E. (2003). Stasis and change: Integrating patterns, functions, and algebra throughout the K-12 curriculum. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 136–150). Reston: NCTM. Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, M. L. Blanton, & D. W. Carraher (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133–160). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Stacey, K. (1989). Finding and using patterns in linear generalising problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00579460. Stephens, A. C., Isler, I., Marum, T., Blanton, M. L., Knuth, E. J., & Gardiner, A. M. (2012). From recursive pattern to correspondence rule: developing students’ abilities to engage in functional thinking. In L. R. Van Zoest, J.-J. Lo, & J. L. Kratky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 821–828). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University. Stephens, A., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., Isler, I., & Gardiner, A. M. (2015). Just say yes to early algebra! Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.22.2.0092. Stylianides, A. J. (2016). Proving in the elementary mathematics classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ureña, J., Ramírez-Úcles, R., & Molina, M. (2019). Representations of the generalization of a functional relationship and the relation with the interviewer’s mediation. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 42(3), 570–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2019.1604020. Vergnaud, G. (2009). The theory of conceptual fields. Human Development, 52(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000202727. Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/749441. Warren, E. (2005). Young children’s ability to generalise the pattern rule for growing patterns. In H. Chick & J. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 305–312). Melbourne: PME. Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008). Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: actions that support 8-year olds’ thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9092-2. Warren, E., Trigueros, M., & Ursini, S. (2016). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A. Gutiérrez, G. C. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: the journey continues (pp. 73–108). Rotterdam: SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_3. Zapatera, A. (2018). Cómo Alumnos De Educación Primaria Resuelven Problemas De Generalización De Patrones. Una Trayectoria De Aprendizaje. [How Primary Education students solve problems of generalization of patterns: a learning trajectory]. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación en Matemática Educativa, 21(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.12802/relime.18.2114.