Why extensive research and development did not promote use of peach palm fruit in Latin America

Agroforestry Systems - Tập 61 - Trang 195-206 - 2004
C.R. Clement1, J.C. Weber2, J. van Leeuwen1, C. Astorga Domian3, D.M. Cole4, L.A. Arévalo Lopez5, H. Argüello6
1Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amaz^onia (INPA), Manaus, Brasil
2Formerly with World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF, Corvallis, USA
3Centro Agronómico Tropical, de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE) Turrialba, Costa Rica
4School of Forest Resources and Conservation, The University of Florida, Gainesville, USA
5World Agroforestry Centre-ICRAF; Carretera Federico Basadre, Pucallpa, Perú
6Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; Apartado, Bogotá, Colombia

Tóm tắt

Peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) was domesticated as a fruit crop by the first Amazonians in traditional Neotropical agroforestry systems, but research and development (R&D) to date has not transformed its fruit into a modern success story. The fruit is really a tree ‘potato,’ competing with traditional starches rather than with succulent fruits. R&D efforts have focused more on production than on product transformation, commercialization and the consumer, thus failing to fill gaps in the production-to-consumption chain. Consumer demands are only now getting more consideration, and clear identification of the smallholder farmer as the R&D client is not yet generalized. Too many, often large germplasm collections have biased R&D programs away from smallholder farmers and did not pursue the quality and uniformity that consumers want. The general lessons learnt from 25 years of R&D efforts on peach palm that should guide the development of other indigenous agroforestry fruit tree species are: 1) identify market demands, whether subsistence or market-oriented; 2) identify clients and consumers, and their perceptions of the product; 3) work on food and nutritional security aspects of the species and let entrepreneurs be attracted, rather than vice versa; 4) take up species improvement in a moderately sized effort, using a participatory approach tightly focused on clients' demands; and 5) reappraise the priorities from time to time.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arévalo L.A., Szott L.T. and Perez J.M. 1993. El Pijuayo como componente de un sistema agroforestal. pp. 267–285. In: Mora Urpí J., Szott L.T., Murillo M. and Patiño V.M. (eds), IV Congresso Internacional sobre Biologia, Agronomia e Industrialización del Pijuayo. Editorial Univ. Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica. Argüello H. and Afanador G. 2002. El Chontaduro - Un Negocio Potencial para la Industria de Concentrados y la Producción Animal. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia, 36 pp. CIPAV/HV 2001. Control Integrado del Barrenador del Chontaduro Bactris gasipaes H.B.K. Fundación CIPAV / Fundación Herencia Verde, Cali, Colombia, 20 pp. Clement C.R. 2000. Pupunha (Bactris gasipaes Kunth, Palmae). Série Frutas Nativas 8, Fundep, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brasil, 48 pp. Clement C.R. 2001. Melhoramento de espécies nativas. pp. 423–441. In: Nass L.L., Valois A.C.C., Melo I.S. and Valadares-Inglis M.C. (eds), Recursos Genéticos & Melhoramento - Plantas. Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa Agropecuária de Mato Grosso - Fundação MT, Rondonópolis, Mato Grosso, Brasil. Clement C.R. In Press. Fruit trees and the transition to food production in Amazonia. In: Balée W. and Erickson C. (eds), Time and Complexity in the Neotropical Lowlands: Studies in Historical Ecology. Columbia University Press, New York. Clement C.R. and Mora Urpí J. 1987. The pejibaye (Bactris gasipaes H.B.K., Arecaceae): multi-use potential for the lowland humid tropics. Econ Bot 41: 302–311. Clement C.R. and Santos L.A. 2002. Pupunha no mercado de Manaus: Preferências de consumidores e suas implicações. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 24: 778–779. Clement C.R. and Leeuwen J. van. In Press. Underutilization of pupunha (Bactris gasipaes Kunth, Palmae) in Central Amazonia: history, production-to-consumption system, implications for development and conservation. In: Alexiades M. and Shanley P. (eds), From Forest to City: Tracking Non-timber Forest Products along the Production to Consumption Chain. Latin American volume. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Hammond D.S., Dolman P.M. and Watkinson A.R. 1995. Modern ticuna swidden-fallow management in the Columbian Amazon: ecologically integrating market strategies and subsistence-driven economies? Hum Ecol 23: 335–356. de Jong W. 1996. Swidden-fallow agroforestry in Amazonia: diversity at close distance. Agroforest Syst 34: 277–290. Kerr L.S., Clement R.N.S., Clement C.R. and Kerr W.E. 1997. Cozinhando com a Pupunha. INPA, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil, 95 pp. Labarta R.A. and Weber J.C. 1998. Valorización económica de bienes tangibles de cinco especies arbóreas agroforestales en la Cuenca Amazónica Peruana. Revista Forestal Centroamericana 23: 12–21. Mora Urpí J., Weber J.C. and Clement C.R. 1997. Peach palm. Bactris gasipaes Kunth. Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 20. Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research-(IPK), Gatersleben and International Plant Genetic Resources Institute-(IPGRI), Rome, 83 pp. Mora Urpí J. and Gainza Echeverria J. (eds) 1999. Palmito de Pejibaye (Bactris gasipaes Kunth): Su Cultivo e Industrializacíon. Editorial Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica, 260 pp. NAS 1975. Underexploited Tropical Plants with Promising Economic Value. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 188 pp. Patiño V.M. 1963. Plantas Cultivadas y Animales Domésticos en América Equinoccial. Tomo I. Frutales. Imprenta Departamental, Cali, Colombia, 547 pp. Patiño V.M. 1992. An ethnobotanical sketch of the palm Bactris (Guilielma) gasipaes. Principes 36: 143–147. Popenoe W. and Jimenez O. 1921. The pejibaye, a neglected foodplant of tropical America. J Hered 12: 151–166. Sotelo Montes C. and Weber J.C. 1997. Priorización de especies arbóreas para sistemas agroforestales en la selva baja del Perú Agroforestería en las Américas 4(14): 12–17. Vockins K. 1999. Analysis of the U.S. Food Market-Opportunities for Heart of Palm. KV Marketing Incorporated, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya, 109 pp. Weber J.C., Sotelo Montes C., Vidaurre H., Dawson I.K. and Simons A.J. 2001. Participatory domestication of agroforestry trees: an example from the Peruvian Amazon. Development in Practice 11: 425–433. Wu Leung W.-T. and Flores M. 1961. Tabla de Composición de Alimentos para Uso en América Latina. INCAP-ICNND, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala, 157 pp. Yuyama L.K.O., Yonekura L., Aguiar J.P.L. and Sousa R.F.S. 1999. Biodisponibilidade de vitamina A da pupunha (Bactris gasipaes Kunth) em ratos. Acta Amazonica 29: 497–500. Yuyama L.K.O., Aguiar J.P.L., Yuyama K., Clement C.R., Macedo S.H.M., Fávaro D.I.T., Afonso C., Vasconcellos M.B.A., Vannucchi H., Pimentel S.A. and Badolato E.S.G. 2003. Chemical composition of the fruit mesocarp of three peach palm (Bactris gasipaes) populations grown in central Amazonia, Brazil. Int J Food Sci Nutr 54: 49–56.