When payments for environmental services will work for conservation

Conservation Letters - Tập 6 Số 4 - Trang 230-237 - 2013
Sven Wunder1
1Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR); Rio de Janeiro Brazil

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Using the article by Muradian et al. () as entry point, I develop a broader framework for the conditions needed to allow PES to emerge and function. It is argued that PES are designed as instruments with clear goals, and will function without markets, economic valuation, or commoditized services. As a highly adaptive management tool, PES are particularly suited for achieving equitable and flexible conservation outcomes. However, PES do require a payment culture and good organization from service users, a trustful negotiation climate, and well‐defined land‐ or resource‐tenure regimes for providers. These demanding preconditions may explain why PES implementation, while promising in many cases, has only spread slowly in low‐income countries.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agustsson K.M., 2010, An assessment of initial impacts of applying a payments for environmental services programme on forest protection and livelihood security: a case study of the Forest Allowance Programme in the Juma Sustainable Development Reserve, State of Amazonas, Brazil

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.014

10.1073/pnas.1011521108

10.1126/science.1152110

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.003

10.1017/S0376892911000531

Corbera E., 2012, Ecosystem services: heed social goals, Science, 225, 6069

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

FAO, 2010, Global forest resources assessment 2010: main report, 344

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.06.010

10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015004990.x

10.1080/10549810802701234

10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01791.x

10.1126/science.1078104

10.2307/3146894

10.1080/14728028.2005.9752518

10.1111/1467-6419.00150

10.1177/0309133311421708

10.1126/science.1182238

Huang M., 2009, Payments for watershed services in Asia: a review of current initiatives, Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 28, 1

IUCN & UNEP‐WCMC, 2011, The World database on protected areas (WDPA)

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002

Kossoy A., 2012, State and trends of the carbon markets 2012, 138

Landell‐Mills N., 2002, Silver bullet or fool's gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor, 249

10.1038/443027a

10.1093/oxrep/grs009

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006

10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x

10.1016/j.tree.2006.10.003

Narloch U., 2011, Payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services: how to make incentive mechanisms work for conservation Corpus Christi College, 220

10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.014

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033

Pagiola S., 2007, Payments for environmental services: from theory to practice

10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011

Pagiola S., 2012, Experiências de pagamentos por serviços ambientais no Brasil, 274

Porras I., 2008, All that glitters: a review of payments for watershed services in developing countries, 130.

Rosa H., 2003, Compensation for environmental services and rural communities, 78

10.1017/S1355770X00000607

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.028

10.1146/annurev-environ-042511-150526

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.018

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.015

WCED, 1987, Our common future

Wunder S., 2005, Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts, CIFOR Occasional Paper, 42, 24

10.1017/S1355770X08004282

10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.010

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Conservation Letters

Tập 6 Số 4

230-237

Thông tin tác giả