What motivates and demotivates Estonian mathematics teachers to continue teaching? The roles of self-efficacy, work satisfaction, and work experience

Karin Täht1,2, Kristel Mikkor3, Getriin Aaviste1, Dmitri Rozgonjuk1,4
1Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
2Institute of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
3Institute of Ecology and Earth Science, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
4Department of Molecular Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany

Tóm tắt

Estonian students achieved high scores in the latest Programme for International Student Assessment surveys. At the same time, there needs to be more knowledge about the teachers guiding these students, as this could provide insights into effective teaching methods that can be replicated in other educational contexts. According to the Teaching and Learning International Survey, Estonian teachers' average age is among the highest in the world, and the shortage of young, qualified mathematics teachers is well-documented. The present study aimed to map the motivating and demotivating factors for mathematics teachers to continue working in this profession. The effective sample comprised 164 Estonian mathematics teachers who responded to items regarding self-efficacy and job satisfaction and open-ended questions about motivating and demotivating factors regarding their work. The results showed that students, salary and vacation, and job environment are both motivating and demotivating for mathematics teachers. On the one hand, helping the students to succeed (and witnessing the progress), satisfying salaries and a good job climate motivate the teachers. And at the same time, students' low motivation, poor salary, and straining work conditions (e.g., very high workload) serve as demotivating factors. We showed that mathematics teachers' work experience is an essential factor to be considered when thinking about motivating and demotivating factors for teachers, as well as their self-efficacy and job satisfaction. The reasons, possible impact, and potential interventions on an educational policy level are discussed.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Admiraal, W., Veldman, I., Mainhard, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2019). A typology of veteran teachers’ job satisfaction: Their relationships with their students and the nature of their work. Social Psychology of Education, 22(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-09477-z Baier, F., Decker, A.-T., Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Klusmann, U., & Kunter, M. (2019). What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of mathematics teachers’ cognitive ability, personality, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation for instructional quality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 767–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12256 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. Boljat, I., Bubica, N., & Matana, A. (2021). Stressors and burnout symptoms of math teachers in Croatian primary and high schools. EDULEARN21 Conference. https://www.bib.irb.hr/1135019/download/1135019.STRESSORS_AND_BURNOUT_SYMPTOMS_OF_MATH_TEACHERS.pdf Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055617 Bretz, R. D., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Person–organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44(1), 32–54. Carroll, A., Flynn, L., O’Connor, E. S., Forrest, K., Bower, J., Fynes-Clinton, S., York, A., & Ziaei, M. (2021). In their words: Listening to teachers’ perceptions about stress in the workplace and how to address it. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 49(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1789914 Chang, Y.-L. (2008). Examining relationships among elementary mathematics teachers’ efficacy and their students’ mathematics self-efficacy and achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75299 Chung, T.-Y., & Chen, Y.-L. (2018). Exchanging social support on online teacher groups: Relation to teacher self-efficacy. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1542–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.022 Corkin, D. M., Ekmekci, A., & Parr, R. (2018). The effects of the school-work environment on mathematics teachers’ motivation for teaching: A self-determination theoretical perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 50–66. Dawis, R. V. (2002). Person-environment-correspondence theory. In Career choice and development (4th ed., pp. 427–464). Career choice and development. Dellinger, A. B., Bobbett, J. J., Olivier, D. F., & Ellett, C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010 Fackler, S., Malmberg, L.-E., & Sammons, P. (2021). An international perspective on teacher self-efficacy: Personal, structural and environmental factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 99, 103255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103255 Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. (2006). Work patterns and stressors of experienced and novice mathematics teachers. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 62(3), 36–40. Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F.-L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(S1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6 Jimmieson, N. L., Terry, D. J., & Callan, V. J. (2004). A Longitudinal study of employee adaptation to organizational change: The role of change-related information and change-related self-efficacy. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.9.1.11 Kandemir, M. A., & Gür, H. (2009). What motivates mathematics teachers? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 969–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.172 Karakus, M., Ersozlu, Z., Usak, M., & Ocean, J. (2021). Self-efficacy, affective well-being, and intent-to-leave by science and mathematics teachers: A structural equation model. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(2), 237–251. Kassambara, A. (2021). rstatix: Pipe-friendly framework for basic statistical tests (0.7.0). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 Kooloos, C., Oolbekkink-Marchand, H., van Boven, S., Kaenders, R., & Heckman, G. (2022). Building on student mathematical thinking in whole-class discourse: Exploring teachers’ in-the-moment decision-making, interpretation, and underlying conceptions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(4), 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09499-z Kyriacou, C., & Kunc, R. (2007). Beginning teachers’ expectations of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1246–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.06.002 León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2015). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017 Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Does teacher burnout affect students? A systematic review of its association with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 105, 101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101714 McCarthy, C. J., Fitchett, P. G., Lambert, R. G., & Boyle, L. (2020). Stress vulnerability in the first year of teaching. Teaching Education, 31(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2019.1635108 Mets, U., & Viia, A. (2018). Tulevikuvaade tööjõu- ja oskuste vajadusele: Haridus ja teadus. Uuringu lühiaruanne. [Future perspective on work force and skills needs: Education and science. Brief report summary.]. SA Kutsekoda. https://oska.kutsekoda.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/oska_HT_veeb.pdf Mróz, A., & Ocetkiewicz, I. (2021). Creativity for sustainability: How do Polish teachers develop students’ creativity competence? Analysis of Research Results. Sustainability, 13(2), 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020571 OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en Orsini, C. A., Tricio, J. A., Segura, C., & Tapia, D. (2020). Exploring teachers’ motivation to teach: A multisite study on the associations with the work climate, students’ motivation, and teaching approaches. Journal of Dental Education, 84(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12050 Partovi, T., & Razavi, M. R. (2019). The effect of game-based learning on academic achievement motivation of elementary school students. Learning and Motivation, 68, 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2019.101592 Peker, M., Erol, R., & Gultekin, M. (2018). Investigation of the teacher self-efficacy beliefs of math teachers. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4), 1–11. Perera, H. N., & John, J. E. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for teaching math: Relations with teacher and student outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101842 Prediger, S., Dröse, J., Stahnke, R., & Ademmer, C. (2022). Teacher expertise for fostering at-risk students’ understanding of basic concepts: Conceptual model and evidence for growth. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09538-3 Prewett, S. L., & Whitney, S. D. (2021). The relationship between teachers’ teaching self-efficacy and negative affect on eighth grade U.S. students’ reading and math achievement. Teacher Development, 25(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1850514 Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616678438 R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (4.2.0). R Core Team. Räsänen, P., Laurillard, D., Käser, T., & von Aster, M. (2019). Perspectives to technology-enhanced learning and teaching in mathematical learning difficulties. In A. Fritz, V. G. Haase, & P. Räsänen (Eds.), International handbook of mathematical learning difficulties (pp. 733–754). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3_42 Revelle, W. (2021). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research (2.2.3). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Rozgonjuk, D., Konstabel, K., Barker, K., Rannikmäe, M., & Täht, K. (2022). Epistemic beliefs in science, socio-economic status, and mathematics and science test results in lower secondary education: A multilevel perspective. Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2022.2144143 Rozgonjuk, D., Täht, K., & Vassil, K. (2021). Internet use at and outside of school in relation to low- and high-stakes mathematics test scores across 3 years. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00287-y Saks, K., Hunt, P., Leijen, Ä., & Lepp, L. (2021). To stay or not to stay: An empirical model for predicting teacher persistence. British Journal of Educational Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2021.2004995 Santagata, R., & Lee, J. (2021). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: A study of novice elementary school teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09447-y Shah, M. J., Ur-Rehman, M., Akhtar, G., Zafar, H., & Riaz, A. (2012). Job satisfaction and motivation of teachers of public educational institutions. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(8), Article 8. Silm, G. (2016). Õpetajate enesetõhususe küsimustiku eesti keelde adapteerimine. [The Estonian adaptation of the teacher self-efficacy scale]. Sinclair, C. (2008). Initial and changing student teacher motivation and commitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660801971658 Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006 Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2020). Teacher burnout: Relations between dimensions of burnout, perceived school context, job satisfaction and motivation for teaching. A longitudinal study. Teachers and Teaching, 26(7–8), Article 7–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1913404 Taimalu, M., Uibu, K., Luik, P., & Leijen, Ä. (2019). Õpetajad ja koolijuhid elukestvate õppijatena. OECD rahvusvahelise õpetamise ja õppimise uuringu TALIS 2018 uuringu tulemused. http://hdl.handle.net/10062/70213 Taimalu, M., Uibu, K., Luik, P., Leijen, Ä., & Pedaste, M. (2020). Õpetajad ja koolijuhid väärtustatud professionaalidena. OECD rahvusvahelise õpetamise ja õppimise uuringu TALIS 2018 uuringu tulemused 2., 1−114. http://www.innove.ee/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/TALIS2_kujundatud.pdf Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: The role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185 Topchyan, R., & Woehler, C. (2021). Do teacher status, gender, and years of teaching experience impact job satisfaction and work engagement? Education and Urban Society, 53(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124520926161 Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Educational Review, 73(1), 71–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1705247 Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1 Tschannen-Moran, M., & Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 751–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.005 Watson, S., & Marschall, G. (2019). How a trainee mathematics teacher develops teacher self-efficacy. Teacher Development, 23(4), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2019.1633392 Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice Scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.75.3.167-202 Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer. Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801