What is wrong with current approaches to management development in relation to women in management roles?

Emerald - 2005
SharonBartram1
1Department of Management Studies, University of York, York, UK

Tóm tắt

PurposeTo challenge gender neutrality within management theories and to show how such theories influence the practice of management development to the detriment of women managers.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is based on a feminist questioning of changes in management theory over the past several decades and the impact this has on management development practice in relation to women.FindingsThe notion of a feminine ethos being carried to practicing managers through characteristics culturally associated with females should be helpful to women. However, the basis for formal, mixed group situations as a means of enabling women to develop as managers is debatable. A continuing reliance on questionnaires that fail to quantify the extent to which the constructs reflect a gender sensitivity and the failure to recognise such situations as reflecting relations between women and men in the wider social context serve to reinforce women in a subordinate role to men, deferring to and privileging men's knowledge.Originality/valueThe value lies in how the paper shows the barriers facing women as they develop as managers in contexts that are still masculine despite claims of a feminisation of management. It is also valuable in the way it suggests a different way of working with women on their development as managers.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bass, B.M., Avolio, B.J. and Atwater, L. (1996), “The transformational and transactional leadership of men and women”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 5‐34.

Bell, E.L. and Nkomo, S.M. (1992), “Re‐visioning women managers' lives”, in Mills, A.J. and Tancred, P. (Eds), Gendering Organisational Analysis, Sage, London.

Blom, J.J. (1977), René Descartes: The Essential Writings, Harper Torch Books, New York, NY.

Bryans, P. and Mavin, S. (2003), “Women learning to become managers: learning to fit in or to play a different game?”, Management Learning, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 111‐34.

Butler, J. (1997), Excitable Speech – A Politics of the Performative, Routledge, New York, NY.

Calas, M. and Smircich, L. (1993), “Dangerous liaison: the feminine in management meets globalization”, Business Horizons, April, pp. 73‐83.

Collinson, D.L. and Hearn, J. (2000), “Critical studies on men, masculinities and managements”, in Davidson, M.J. and Burke, R.J. (Eds), Women in Management – Current Research Issues, Vol. 2, Sage, London.

de Beauvoir, S. (1953), The Second Sex, Jonathan Cape, London.

Drucker, P.F. (1979), Management, Pan Books Ltd, London.

Fondas, N. (1997), “Feminisation unveiled: management qualities in contemporary writings”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 257‐82.

Foucault, M. (1972), The Archaeology of Knowledge, Routledge, London.

Foucault, M. (1998), The Will to Knowledge – the History of Sexuality, Vol. 1, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

Foucault, M. (2000), Faubion, J.D. (Ed.), Power, The New Press, New York, NY.

Gherardi, S. (1994), “The gender we think, the gender we do in our everyday organisational lives”, Human Relations, Vol. 47 No. 6, pp. 591‐609.

Hardy, V. and Hodgson, V. (1991), “Gender and knowledge: an exploration”, paper presented at the Women in Management Learning Conference, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

Hardy, V., Hodgson, V. and McConnell, D. (1994), “Computer conferencing: a new medium for investigating issues in gender and learning”, Higher Education, Vol. 28, pp. 403‐18.

Johnson‐Bailey, J. and Cervero, R.M. (1998), “Power dynamics in teaching and learning practices: an examination of two adult education classrooms”, International Journal of Lifelong Education, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 389‐99.

Kolb, D. (1984), Experiential Learning, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Marshall, J. (1984), Women Managers: Travellers in a Male World, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

Marx, K. (1962), Capital – A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. III, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow.

Metcalfe, B. and Linstead, A. (2003), “Gendering teamwork: re‐writing the feminine”, Gender, Work and Organisation, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 94‐119.

Mintzberg, H. (1975), “The manager's job: folklore and fact”, Harvard Business Review, July/August, pp. 49‐61.

Putnam Tong, R. (1998), Feminist Thought, 2nd ed., West View Press, Boulder, CO.

Rosener, J.B. (1990), “Ways women lead”, Harvard Business Review, November/December, pp. 119‐25.

Rothwell, S. (1985), “Is management a masculine role?”, Management Education and Development, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 79‐88.

Scarborough, H. and Burrell, G. (1996), “The axeman cometh: the changing roles and knowledges of middle managers”, in Clegg, S.R. and Palmer, G. (Eds), The Politics of Management Knowledge, Sage, London.

Severiens, S., Ten Dam, G. and Nijenhuis, E. (1998), “Ways of knowing and patterns of reasoning: women and men in adult secondary education”, Gender and Education, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 327‐42.

Skeggs, B. (2003), Class, Self, Culture, Routledge, London.

Stanford, J.H., Oates, B.R. and Flores, D. (1995), “Women's leadership styles: a heuristic analysis”, Women in Management Review, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 9‐16.

Stewart, R. (1986), The Reality of Management, Pan Books Ltd, London.

Tannen, D. (1995), TALKING from 9 to 5, Virago Press, London.

Vinkenburg, C.J., Jansen, P.G.W. and Koopman, P.L. (2000), “Feminine leadership – a review of gender differences in managerial behaviour and effectiveness”, in Davidson, M.J. and Burke, R.J. (Eds), Women in Management – Current Research Issues, Vol. 2, Sage, London.

Wajcman, J. (1998), Managing Like a Man, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Weedon, C. (1997), Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, 2nd ed., Blackwell Publishers, Oxford.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Thông tin tác giả