What does physiological synchrony reveal about metacognitive experiences and group performance?
Tóm tắt
There is a growing body of research on physiological synchrony (PS) in Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS). However, the current literature presents inconclusive findings about the way in which PS is reflected in cognitive and affective group processes and performance. In light of this, this study investigates the relationship between PS and metacognitive experiences (ie, judgement of confidence, task interest, task difficulty, mental effort and emotional valence) that are manifested during CPS. In addition, the study explores the association between PS and group performance. The participants were 77 university students who worked together on a computer‐based CPS simulation in groups of three. Participants’ electrodermal activity (EDA) was recorded as they worked on the simulation and metacognitive experiences were measured with situated self‐reports. A Multidimensional Recurrence Quantification Analysis was used to calculate the PS among the collaborators. The results show a positive relationship between continuous PS episodes and groups’ collective mental effort. No relationship was found between PS and judgement of confidence, task interest, task difficulty or emotional valence. The relationship between PS and group performance was also non‐significant. The current work addresses several challenges in utilising multimodal data analytics in CPS research and discusses future research directions.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baker L., 1984, Handbook of reading research, 353
Csapó B., 2017, The nature of problem solving. Using research to inspire 21st century learning
Dawson M. E., 2017, Handbook of psychophysiology, 217
Dindar M. Järvelä S. Ahola S. Huang X. &Zhao G.(2019).Leaders and followers identified by emotional mimicry during collaborative learning: A facial expression recognition study on emotional valence. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. on emotional valence. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.
Efklides A., 2004, Efklides1B.Pdf, Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 179
Guastello S. J., 2016, Cognitive workload and fatigue in a vigilance dual task: miss errors, false alarms, and the effect of wearing biometric sensors while working, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 20, 509
Hadwin A. F., 2018, Handbook of self‐regulation of learning and performance, 83
Hausser J., 2009, Entropy Inference and the James‐Stein estimator, with application to nonlinear gene association networks Korbinian strimmer, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 10, 1469
Lu J. G., 2017, Micromacromultilevel R package
OECD, 2013, PISA 2015 collaborative problem solving framework
Palumbo R. V., 2016, Interpersonal autonomic physiology: A systematic review of the literature, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 1
Scollon R., 2009, The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, 170
Twisk J. W. R., 2003, Applied longitudinal data analysis for epidemiology: A practical guide
Wallot S., 2018, Analyzing multivariate dynamics using cross‐recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA), diagonal‐cross‐recurrence profiles (DCRP), and multidimensional recurrence quantification analysis (MdRQA) – A tutorial in R, Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1, 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02232
Webber C. L., 2005, Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences, 26
Wiltshire T. J., 2015, Team interaction dynamics during collaborative problem solving
Winne P. H., 2010, Bootstrapping learner’s self‐regulated learning, Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 52, 472