What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Tóm tắt
We examine some issues in the estimation of time-series cross-section models, calling into question the conclusions of many published studies, particularly in the field of comparative political economy. We show that the generalized least squares approach of Parks produces standard errors that lead to extreme overconfidence, often underestimating variability by 50% or more. We also provide an alternative estimator of the standard errors that is correct when the error structures show complications found in this type of model. Monte Carlo analysis shows that these “panel-corrected standard errors” perform well. The utility of our approach is demonstrated via a reanalysis of one “social democratic corporatist” model.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Kmenta, 1986, Elements of Econometrics
Hicks, 1994, The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State
Hsaio, 1986, Analysis of Panel Data
Hurwicz, 1950, Statistical Inference in Dynamic Economic Models
Beck Nathaniel , and Katz Jonathan N. . N.d. “Nuisance or Substance: Specifying and Estimating Times-Series–Cross-Section Models.” Political Analysis. Forthcoming.
Levobic, 1994, Riding Waves or Making Waves? The Services and the U.S. Defense Budget, 1981–1993., American Political Science Review, 88, 839, 10.2307/2082711
Hicks, 1994, The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State