Thế nào là hoàn thành tốt (cho giới tính của bạn)! Bằng chứng thực nghiệm về tiêu chuẩn thay đổi dựa trên định kiến của giáo viên trong việc chấm điểm kiểm tra và phản hồi chi tiết

Banse, R., & Gawronski, B. (2003). Die Skala Motivation zu vorurteilsfreiem Verhalten: Psychometrische Eigenschaften und Validität. Diagnostica, 49(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.49.1.4 Biernat, M. (2012). Chapter one—stereotypes and shifting standards: Forming, communicating, and translating person impressions. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (pp. 1–59). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-394286-9.00001-9 Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5 Bonefeld, M., Dickhäuser, O., & Karst, K. (2020). Do preservice teachers’ judgments and judgment accuracy depend on students’ characteristics? The effect of gender and immigration background. Social Psychology of Education, 23(1), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-019-09533-2 Cornwell, C., Mustard, D. B., & Van Parys, J. (2013). Noncognitive skills and the gender disparities in test scores and teacher assessments: Evidence from primary school. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.48.1.236 Croft, A., & Schmader, T. (2012). The feedback withholding bias: Minority students do not receive critical feedback from evaluators concerned about appearing racist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1139–1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.010 Curran, P. J., & Hussong, A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015914 PubMed. Duval, C. M. (1980). Differential teacher grading behavior toward female students of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(3), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/748941 Dweck, C. S., Davidson, W., Nelson, S., & Enna, B. (1978). Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and III. An experimental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 14(3), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.14.3.268 Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312474350 Falch, T., & Naper, L. R. (2013). Educational evaluation schemes and gender gaps in student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 36, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.05.002 Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2 Harber, K. D. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 622–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.622 Harber, K. D., Gorman, J. L., Gengaro, F. P., Butisingh, S., Tsang, W., & Ouellette, R. (2012). Students’ race and teachers’ social support affect the positive feedback bias in public schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028110 Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487 Heller, K. A., & Parsons, J. E. (1981). Sex differences in teachers’ evaluative feedback and students’ expectancies for success in mathematics. Child Development, 52(3), 1015. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129106. Heyder, A., & Kessels, U. (2015). Do teachers equate male and masculine with lower academic engagement? How students’ gender enactment triggers gender stereotypes at school. Social Psychology of Education, 18(3), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9303-0 Hofer, S. I. (2015). Studying gender bias in physics grading: The role of teaching experience and country. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2879–2905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1114190 Holder, K., & Kessels, U. (2017). Gender and ethnic stereotypes in student teachers’ judgments: A new look from a shifting standards perspective. Social Psychology of Education, 20(3), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-017-9384-z Ingenkamp, K. (1971). Die Fragwürdigkeit der Zensurengebung [The dubiousness of school grades]. Beltz. IQB. (2012). IQB—Beispielaufgaben Deutsch Primarstufe. https://www.iqb.hu-berlin.de/vera/aufgaben/dep IQB. (2013). IQB—Beispielaufgaben Mathematik Primarstufe. https://www.iqb.hu-berlin.de/vera/aufgaben/map. Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A meta-analytic perspective on sex equity in the classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 443–471. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004443 Kuhl, P., & Hannover, B. (2012). Differenzielle Benotungen von Mädchen und Jungen. Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie, 44(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637/a000066 Lavy, V., & Sand, E. (2015). On The Origins of Gender Human Capital Gaps: Short and Long Term Consequences of Teachers’ Stereotypical Biases. University of Warwick, Department of Economics. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wrk:warwec:1085 Lindahl, E. (2016). Are teacher assessments biased?—evidence from Sweden. Education Economics, 24(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2015.1014882 Marcenaro-Gutierrez, O., & Vignoles, A. (2015). A comparison of teacher and test-based assessment for Spanish primary and secondary students. Educational Research, 57(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2014.983720 McShane, B. B., & Böckenholt, U. (2017). Single-paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory testing, and replicability. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 1048–1063. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw085 Narciss, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51(3), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.214 pdh. Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3. (pp. 125–144). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880869.ch11 Narciss, S. (2017). Conditions and effects of feedback viewed through the lens of the interactive tutoring feedback model. In D. Carless, S. M. Bridges, C. K. Y. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education. (pp. 173–189). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_12 Parsons, J. E., Kaczala, C. M., & Meece, J. L. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Classroom influences. Child Development, 53(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128974 Retelsdorf, J., Schwartz, K., & Asbrock, F. (2015). “Michael can’t read!” Teachers’ gender stereotypes and boys’ reading self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037107 pdh. Robinson, J. P., & Lubienski, S. (2011). The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: Examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 268–302. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372249 Robinson-Cimpian, J. P., Lubienski, S. T., Ganley, C. M., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2014a). Teachers’ perceptions of students’ mathematics proficiency may exacerbate early gender gaps in achievement. Developmental Psychology, 50(4), 1262–1281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035073 Robinson-Cimpian, J. P., Lubienski, S. T., Ganley, C. M., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2014b). Are schools shortchanging boys or girls? The answer rests on methods and assumptions: Reply to Card (2014) and Penner (2014). Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1840–1844. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036693 Sagarin, B. J., Ambler, J. K., & Lee, E. M. (2014). An ethical approach to peeking at data. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528214 Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795 Spear, M. G. (1984a). The biasing influence of pupil sex in a science marking exercise. Research in Science and Technological Education, 2(1), 55–60 Spear, M. G. (1984b). Sex bias in science teachers’ ratings of work and pupil characteristics. European Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528840060407 Swim, J., Borgida, E., Maruyama, G., & Myers, D. G. (1989). Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.409 Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020518104346