Web Conferencing Facilitation Within Problem-Based Learning Biomedical Engineering Courses

Sara L. Arena1, Yong W. Lee1, Scott S. Verbridge1, Andre Muelenaer1, Pamela J. VandeVord1, Christopher B. Arena1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractProblem-based learning (PBL) has been effectively used within BME education, though there are several challenges in its implementation within courses with larger enrollments. Furthermore, the sudden transition to online learning from the COVID-19 pandemic introduced additional challenges in creating a similar PBL experience in an online environment. Online constrained PBL was implemented through asynchronous modules and synchronous web conferencing with rotating facilitators. Overall, facilitators perceived web conferencing facilitation to be similar to in-person, but noted that students were more easily “hidden” or distracted. Students did not comment on web conferencing facilitation specifically, but indicated the transition to online PBL was smooth. Course instructors identified that a fully synchronous delivery as well as modifications of Group Meeting Minutes assignments as potential modifications for future offerings. Future work will aim to address the perceptions and effectiveness of web conferencing facilitation for PBL courses within an undergraduate BME curriculum, as web conferencing could prove to be another significant breakthrough in addressing challenges of problem-based learning courses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arena SL, et al. Work in progress: student and faculty perceptions of rotating faculty facilitators for introductory biomedical engineering problem-based learning. In: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Engineering Education. 2020: Virtual Conference June 21–24; 2020.

Barrows HS. The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois Univ.; 1988.

Clyne AM, Billiar KL. Problem-based learning in biomechanics: advantages, challenges, and implementation strategies. J Biomech Eng. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033671.

Collins A, Brown JS, Newman SE. Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. Thinking. 1988;8(1):2–10.

Eberlein T, et al. Pedagogies of engagement in science: a comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2008;36(4):262–73.

Frederiksen CH. Learning to reason through discourse in a problem-based learning group. Discourse Processes. 1999;27(2):135–60.

Hmelo-Silver CE, Barrows HS. Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisc J Problem-based Learn. 2006;1(1):4.

LaPlaca MC, Newstetter WC, Yoganathan AP. Problem-based learning in biomedical engineering curricula. In: 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No. 01CH37193), vol. 2; 2001. pp. F3E-16.

Newstetter WC. Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: the PBL approach. Ann Biomed Eng. 2006;34(2):217–25.

Palincsar AS. Applying a sociocultural lens to the work of a transition community. Discourse Process. 1999;27(2):161–71.

Ropella, K.M., D.M. Kelso, and J.D. Enderle. Preparing biomedical engineers for real-world problem-solving. In: ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings; 2001.

van Bbarneveld A, Strobel J. Implementation of PBL in engineering education: conceptualization and management of tensions. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA); 2015.

Warnock JN, Mohammadi-Aragh MJ. Case study: use of problem-based learning to develop students' technical and professional skills. Eur J Eng Educ. 2016;41(2):142–53.