Water quality concerns and the public policy context
Tóm tắt
National water quality concerns are creating momentum for legislation that takes a proactive stance toward agricultural practices involving agrichemicals. In response, the Environmental Protection Agency has asked the states to design appropriate non-point source pollution policies. This article examines the issues involved in two ways. First, it reviews the literature on previous conservation policies and discusses the implications for stricter regulation. Second, in order to determine the public opinion context for non-point source pollution policies, it examines the responses of a sample of Oklahoma rural leaders to a set of environmental, water quality, political, economic, and family farm orientation items developed in previous surveys. The analysis considers areas of agreement and disagreement related to socio-economic status, education, and extent of involvement in farming. It concludes that although Oklahoma's rural leaders are concerned about water quality problems, an environmentally-sound formulation of rural values has yet to develop. The most serious obstacle appears to be the perceived threat of environmental regulations to the variability of production agriculture.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abdulla, Charles W. and Lawrence W. Libby. “Agriculture and Ground Water Quality: A Public Policy Perspective,”American Journal of Alternative Agriculture. 2(1): 37–40. 1987.
Buttel, Frederick H. and William L. Flinn. “The Politics of Environmental Concern: The Impacts of Party Identification and Political Ideology on Environmental Attitudes,”Environment and Behavior. 10(1): 17–36. 1978.
Buttel, Frederick H. and William L. Flinn. “Economic Growth Versus the Environment: Survey Evidence,”Social Science Quarterly. 57: 410–420. 1976.
Buttel, Frederick H. and William L. Flinn. “The Structure of Support for the Environmental Movement, 1968–70,”Rural Sociology. 39(1): 56–69. 1974.
Buttel, Frederick H., Gilbert W. Gillespie, Jr., Oscar W. Larson III, and Craig K. Harris. “The Social Bases of Agrarian Environmentalism: A Comparative Analysis of New York and Michigan Farm Operators,”Rural Sociology. 46(3): 391–410. 1981.
Buttel, Frederick H. and Louis E. Swanson. “Soil and Water Conservation: A Farm Structural and Public Policy Context.” InConserving Soil: Insights from Socioeconomic Research. Lovejoy, Stephen B. and Ted L. Napier (eds.). Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society. 1986.
Cox, William E. and Sandra S. Batie.Protecting Ground Water from Agricultural Impacts: The Contradictory Policy Environment. Proceedings of the Agricultural Impacts on Ground Water Conference. National Water Well Association. Des Moines, Iowa, March 1988.
Drake, Laurence, Leonard A. Solomon, and Harry Birdwell.A History of Conservation in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Association of Conservation Districts. 1978.
Dunlap, Riley E. and Kent D. Van Liere. “Commitment to the Dominant Social Paradigm and Concern for Environmental Quality,”Social Science Quarterly. 65: 1013–28. 1984.
Dunlap, Riley E. and Kent D. Van Liere. “The ‘New Environmental Paradigm’,”The Journal of Environmental Education. 9: 10–19. 1978.
Environmental Protection Agency.Agricultural Chemicals in Ground Water: Proposed Pesticide Strategy. Washington, D.C. December 1987.
Esseks, J. Dixon and Steven E. Kraft.Government's Role in Promoting Soil Conservation by Farmers: Farmers' Perceptions in Six Diverse Sites. Washington, D.C.: American Farmland Trust. 1984.
Grey, David B. with Richard J. Borden and Russell H. Weigel.Ecological Beliefs and Behaviors: Assessment and Change. Westport: Greenwood Press. 1985.
Harris, Hal M. and M. D. Hammig.Attitudes of Southern Farmers Toward Government Agricultural Programs. Southern Extension Public Affairs Committee, Publication 85-1. Clemson, South Carolina: Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service. 1985.
Korsching, Peter F. “Some Iowa Soil Conservation Problems and Prospects.” Paper presented at the Land Use/Ownership Conference, Rural Iowa, Inc., Des Moines. 1981.
Korsching, Peter F. and Peter J. Nowak. “Water Resources Research: Potential Contribution by Sociologists,” InWater Resources Research: Problems and Potentials for Agricultural and Rural Communities. Napier, Ted L., Donald Scott, K. William Easter, and Raymond Supalla (eds.). Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society. 1983.
Moore, Keith M. “New Thoughts on Agrarianism.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society. Madison, Wisconsin. August 1987a.
Moore, Keith M. “Oklahoma Farmer, Endangered Species: The Changing Rural Social Structure,”Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology. 15(2). 1987b.
Moore, Keith M.Farmer and Non-Farmer Attitudes Toward Environmental Policy Issues: An Exploratory Survey. University Center For Water Research, Oklahoma State University. 1988.
Nowak, Peter J. and Peter F. Korsching. “Social and Institutional Factors Affecting the Adoption and Maintenance of Agricultural BMPs.” InAgricultural Management and Water Quality. Schaller, Frank W. and George W. Bailey (eds.). Ames: Iowa State University Press. 1983.
Nunnally, Jum C.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1978.
Padgitt, Steven.Agriculture and Groundwater Issues in Big Spring Basin and Winneshiek County, Iowa: Survey of Farm and Non-farm Households on Perceptions, Attitudes, and Farming Practices. Cooperative Extension Service, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa. 1987.
Padgitt, Steven and Bernard Hoyer. “Agriculture and Groundwater Quality: Farmers Versus Non-farmers in a New Environmental Battleground.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Rural Sociological Society. Madison, Wisconsin. August 1987.
Rogers, Everett M.Diffusion of Innovations, 34d edition. New York: Free Press. 1983.
Sampson, R. Neil.For Love of the Land: A History of the National Association of Conservation Districts. League City: National Association of Conservation Districts. 1985.
Swanson, Louis E., Silvana M. Camboni, and Ted L. Napier. “Barriers to Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices on Farms.” InConserving Soil: Insights from Socio-Economic Research. Lovejoy, Stephen B. and Ted L. Napier (eds.). Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society. 1986.
Tremblay, Kenneth R. and Riley E. Dunlap. “Rural-Urban Residence and Concern with Environmental Quality: A Replication and Extension,”Rural Sociology. 43(3):474–491. 1978.
United States Department of Agriculture.Structure Issues of American Agriculture. Economics, Statistics and Cooperatives Service. Agricultural Economic Report No. 438. 1979.
Van Liere, Kent D. and Riley E. Dunlap. “The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evicence,”Public Opinion Quarterly. 44: 181–197. 1980.
Vogeler, Ingolf.The Myth of the Family Farm: Agribusiness Dominance of U.S. Agriculture. Boulder, Colorado: Westview. 1981.
Weigel, Russell H. and Joan Weigel. “Environmental Concern: Development of a Measure.”Environmental and Behavior. 10: 3–15, 1978.
Zinn, Jeff A. Groundwater Issues and the U.S. Department of Agriculture—An Institutional Perspective. Congressional Research Service, 88-322 ENR, 1988.