Wann helfen wir einander? Befunde zur Bedeutung der Gruppenzugehörigkeit

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 44 Số 1 - Trang 25-36 - 2013
Cornelia Edding1
1Boitzenburger Land, Deutschland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Edding, C. (2009). Kleingruppenforschung – Geschichte, aktueller Stand, Bedeutung für die Praxis. In C. Edding & K. Schattenhofer (Hrsg.), Handbuch Alles über Gruppen (S. 47–83). Weinheim: Beltz.

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Inter-group bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 575–604.

Hogg, M. A. (2005). Social identity and leadership. In D. M. Messik & R. M. Kramer (Hrsg.), The psychology of leadership: New perspectives and research (S. 53–80). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hopkins, N., Reicher, S., Harrison, K., Cassidy, C., Bul, R., & Levine, M. (2007). Helping to improve the group stereotype: On the strategic dimension of prosocial behavior. 33, 776–788.

Jonas, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). The scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1342–1353.

Van Leeuwen, E. (2007). Restoring identity through outgroup helping: Beliefs about international aid in response to the December 2004 tsunami. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 661–671.

Van Leeuwen, E., & Täuber, S. (2010). The strategic side of outgroup helping. In S. Stürmer & M. Snyder (Hrsg.), The psychology of prosocial behavior (S. 81–99). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Levine, M., Cassidy, C., Brazier, G., & Reicher, S. (2002). Self-categorization and bystander non-intervention: Two experimental studies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1452–1463.

Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443–453.

Levine, M., & Cassidy, C. (2010). Groups, identities and bystander behavior. In S. Stürmer & S. Snyder (Hrsg.), The psychology of prosocial behavior (S. 209–222). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Nadler, A. (2002). Inter-group helping releations as power relations: Maintaining or challenging social dominance between groups through helping. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 487–502.

Nadler, A., & Halabi, S. (2006). Intergroup helping as status relations: Effects of status stability, identification and type of help on receptivity to high status group’s help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 97–110.

Neuberger, O. (2007). Mikropolitik und Moral in Organisationen. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books.

Reicher, S., & Haslam, S. A. (2010). Beyond help. A social psychology of collective solidarity and social cohesion. In S. Stürmer & M. Snyder (Hrsg.), The psychology of prosocial behavior (S. 283–309). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Schneider, M. E., Major, B., Luthanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1996). Social stigma and the potential costs of assumptive help. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 201–209.

Stürmer, S., & Snyder, M. (Hrsg.). (2010). The psychology of prosocial behavior. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Hrsg.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (S. 33–47). Monterey: Brooks/Cole